1,915
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Investigating student experiences of botanical field work using a semi-immersive virtual botanical fieldtrip

ORCID Icon
Received 22 Aug 2022, Accepted 08 Feb 2023, Published online: 25 Apr 2023

References

  • Anderson, D. S., and J. L. Miskimins. 2006. “Using Field-Camp Experiences to Develop a Multidisciplinary Foundation for Petroleum Engineering Students.” Journal of Geoscience Education 54 (2): 172–178. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-54.2.172.
  • Bacon, K. L., and J. Peacock. 2021. “Sudden Challenges in Teaching Ecology and Aligned Disciplines During a Global Pandemic: Reflections on the Rapid Move Online and Perspectives on Moving Forward.” Academic Practice in Ecology & Evolution 11 (8): 3551–3558. doi:10.1002/ece3.7090.
  • Beltran, R. S., E. Marnocha, A. Race, D. A. Croll, G. H. Dayton, and E. S. Zavaleta. 2020. “Field Courses Narrow Demographic Achievement Gaps in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.” Ecology and Evolution 10 (12): 5184–5196. doi:10.1002/ece3.6300.
  • Cliffe, A. D. 2017. “A Review of the Benefits and Drawbacks to Virtual Field Guides in Today’s Geoscience Higher Education Environment.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14 (1): 28. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0066-x.
  • Cooke, J., Y. Araya, K. L. Bacon, J. M. Bagniewska, L. Batty, T. R. Bishop, M. Burns, et al. 2021. “Teaching and Learning in Ecology: A Horizon Scan of Emerging Challenges and Solutions.” Oikos 130 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1111/oik.07847.
  • Dillon, J., M. Rickinson, K. Teamey, M. Morris, M. Y. Choi, D. Sanders, and P. Benefield. 2006. “The Value of Outdoor Learning: Evidence from Research in the UK and Elsewhere.” The School Science Review 87 (320): 107–113.
  • Easton, E., and A. Gilburn. 2012. “The Field Course Effect: Gains in Cognitive Learning in Undergraduate Biology Students Following a Field Course.” Journal of Biological Education 46 (1): 29–35. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.568063.
  • Eaton, D. 2000. “Cognitive and affective learning in outdoor education.” Dissertation Abstracts International – Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.60 (10–A): 3595.
  • Gerhart, L. M., C. C. Jadallah, S. S. Angulo, and G. C. Ira. 2021. “Teaching an Experiential Field Course via Online Participatory Science Projects: A COVID-19 Case Study of a UC California Naturalist Course.” Academic Practice in Ecology & Evolution 11 (8): 3537–3550. doi:10.1002/ece3.7187.
  • Goodenough, A. E., R. N. Rolfe, L. MacTavish, and A. G. Hart. 2015. “The Role of Overseas Field Courses in Student Learning in the Biosciences.” Bioscience Education. doi:10.11120/beej.2014.00021.
  • Hix, D. M. 2015. “Providing the Essential Foundation Through an Experiential Learning Approach: An Intensive Field Course on Forest Ecosystems for Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Forestry 113 (5): 484–489. doi:10.5849/jof.14-065.
  • Makransky, G. Makransky, T. S. Terkildsen, and R. E. Mayer. 2017. “Adding Immersive Virtual Reality to a Science Lab Simulation Causes More Resence but Less Learning.” Learning & Instruction 60: 225–236. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007.
  • McKinnon, L. 2021. “YIMBY—Yes, in My BackYard!—the Successful Transition to a Local Online Ecology Field Course.” Academic Practice in Ecology & Evolution 11 (22): 12542–12548. doi:10.1002/ece3.6881.
  • Moreno, R., and R. Mayer. 2002. “Learning Science in Virtual Reality Multimedia Environments: Role of Methods and Media.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (3): 598–610. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.598.
  • Pagani-Núñez, E., M. Yan, Y. Hong, Y. Zeng, S. Chen, P. Zhao, and Y. Zou. 2022. “Undergraduates’ Persecutions on Emergency Remote Learning in Ecology in the Post-Pandemic Era.” Ecology and Evolution 12 (3): e8659. doi:10.1002/ece3.8659.
  • Parnell, J., and T. Curtis. 2012. Webb’s an Irish Flora. 8th ed. Cork, Ireland: Cork University Press.
  • Peacock, J., and K. L. Bacon. 2018. “Enhancing Student Employability Through Urban Ecology Fieldwork.” Higher Education Pedagogies 3 (1): 440–450. doi:10.1080/23752696.2018.1462097.
  • Race, A. I., M. De Jesus, R. S. Beltran, and E. S. Zavaleta. 2021. “A Comparative Study Between Outcomes of an In-Person versus Online Introductory Field Course.” Academic Practice in Ecology & Evolution 11 (8): 3625–3635. doi:10.1002/ece3.7209.
  • Schnell, L. J., G. L. Simpson, D. M. Suchan, W. Quere, H. G. Weger, and M. C. Davis. 2021. “An At-Home Laboratory in Plant Biology Designed to Engage Students in the Process of Science.” Ecology & Evolution 11 (24): 17572–17580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8441.
  • Stagg, B. C., and M. Donkin. 2013. “Teaching Botanical Identification to Adults: Experiences of the UK Participatory Science Project ‘Open Air Laboratories’.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (2): 104–110. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.764341.
  • Stickney, L. T., R. F. Bento, A. Aggarwal, and V. Adlakha. 2019. “Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents.” Journal of Management Education 43 (5): 509–542. doi:10.1177/1052562919845022.
  • Stokes, A., T. Collins, J. Maskall, J. Lea, P. Lunt, and S. Davies. 2012. “Enabling Remote Access to Fieldwork: Gaining Insight into the Pedagogic Effectiveness of ‘Direct’ and ‘Remote’ Field Activities.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 36 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1080/03098265.2011.619004.
  • University of Leeds’ Virtual Landscapes. Accessed 14th June 2020. https://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/virtual-landscapes/
  • Virtual Glaciers. Accessed 29 October 2020. https://vrglaciers.wp.worc.ac.uk/wordpress/
  • Youmans, M. 2020. “Going Remote: How Teaching During a Crisis is Unique to Other Distance Learning Experiences.” Journal of Chemical Education 97 (9): 3374–3380. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00764.