439
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Organizing Curriculum Change

Propedeutics to an international comparative analysis of state-based curriculum-making

References

  • Baker, D. P. (2011). The future of the schooled society: The transforming culture of education in postindustrial society. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in sociology of education (pp. 11–34). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-1576-9
  • Benavot, A. (2002a). Curricular content and societal outcomes. In F. Audigier & N. Bottani (Eds.), Actes du colloque La problématique du vivre ensemble dans les curricula[Proceedings of the seminar Learning to live together and curricular content] (pp. 79–100). Geneva: Service de la recherche en éducation.
  • Benavot, A. (2002b). Educational globalization and the allocation of instructional time in national education systems: Report submitted to the International Bureau of Education of UNESCO. Geneva: UNESCO International Bureau of Education.
  • Benavot, A. (2004). A global study of intended instructional time and official school curricula 1980–2000. Background paper for EFA global monitoring report 2005. Geneva: UNESCO International Bureau of Education. Retrieved August 27, 2015 from, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001466/146625e.pdf
  • Boli, J., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (1985). Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education. Comparative Education Review, 29, 145–170.10.1086/446504
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Bürgi, R. (2015). Geplante Bildung für die freie Welt. Die OECD und die Entstehung einer technokratischen Bildungsexpertise[Planned education for the free world. The OECD and the emergence of a technocratic educational expertise]. ( Unpublished dissertation), University of Luxembourg.
  • Carnoy, M. (2006). Rethinking the comparative—and the international. Comparative Education Review, 50, 551–570.10.1086/507054
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (Eds.). (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Drori, G. S., & Moon, H. (2006). The changing nature of secondary education: Cross-national trends in disciplinary enrollment, 1965–1995. In D. P. Baker & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), The impact of comparative education research on institutional theory (pp. 157–185). Oxford: Elsevier Science.10.1016/S1479-3679(06)07008-3
  • Durkheim, E. (1956 [1922]). Education and sociology. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
  • Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Fuller, B. B., & Rubinson, R. (Eds.). (1992). The political construction of education: The state, school expansion, and economic change. New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Jullien, M.-A. (1962 [1817]). Esquisse d’un ouvrage sur l’éducation comparée et séries de questions sur l’éducation. Facsimile. Geneva: Bureau International d’Education.
  • Kamens, D. H. (2012). Beyond the nation-state. The reconstruction of nationhood and citizenship. Bringley: Emerald.10.1108/rses
  • Kamens, D. H., Meyer, J. W., & Benavot, A. (1996). Worldwide patterns in academic secondary education curricula, 1920–1990. Comparative Education Review, 40, 116–138.10.1086/447368
  • Lange, S., & Schiemank, U. (Eds.). (2004). Governance und gesellschaftliche Integration [Governance and social integration]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Luhmann, N. (2002). Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft [The education system of society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Luhmann, N., & Schorr, K.-E. (2000). Problems of reflection in the system of education. (R. A. Neuwirth, Trans.). Munster: Waxmann.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (2003). The political governing (governance) of education and evaluation. In P. Haug & T. A. Schwandt (Eds.), Evaluating educational reforms. Scandinavian perspectives (pp. 99–110). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • McEneaney, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The content of the curriculum. An institutionalist perspective. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), The handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 189–211). New York, NY: Kluwer.
  • Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy. The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 55–77.10.1086/226506
  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation‐state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181.10.1086/231174
  • Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D. H., and Benavot, A. in collaboration with Cha, Y.-K., and Wong, S.-Y. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary school categories in the twentieth century. London: Falmer.
  • Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Ragin, C. C. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. (1996). The distinctiveness of comparative social science. In A. Inkeles & M. A. Sasaki (Eds.), Comparing nations and cultures: Readings in a cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 74–89). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). National curricula: World models and national historical legacies. In M. Caruso & H.-E. Tenorth (Eds.), Internationalisation/Internationalization. Semantik und Bildungssysteme in vergleichender Perspektive/Comparing Educational Systems and Semantics (pp. 91–107). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education. A citizen’s guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Rosenmund, M. (2006). The current discourse on curriculum change: A comparative analysis of national reports on education. In A. Benavot & C. Braslavsky (Eds.), School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective. Changing curricula in primary and secondary schools (pp. 173–194). Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Springer.
  • Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The world-wide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70, 898–920.10.1177/000312240507000602
  • Schriewer, J. (1999). Coping with complexity in comparative methodology: Issues of social causation and processes of macro-historical globalization. In R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot, & D. Phillips (Eds.), Learning from comparing. New directions in comparative educational research. Vol. 1. Contexts, classrooms and outcomes (pp. 33–72). Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Teodoro, A., & Estrela, E. (2010). Curriculum policy in Portugal (1995–2007): Global agendas and regional and national reconfigurations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 621–647.10.1080/00220271003735728
  • Tyack, D. B. (2003). Seeking common ground: Public schools in a diverse society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • UNESCO International Bureau of Education. (2000). National reports on the development of education. Suggestions for preparation: 2001 series. Geneva: Author.
  • UNESCO International Bureau of Education. (2002). 46th international conference on education 2001 [CD-ROM]. Geneva: Author.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1974–1988). The modern world-system, Vols. 1–4. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.