Practising the public? Collaborative teacher inquiry in an era of standardization and accountability

References

• Aasebø, T., Midtsundstad, J., & Willbergh, I. (2015). Teaching in the age of accountability: Restrained by school culture? Journal of Curriculum Studies. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1072249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2008). Governmental professionalism: Re-professionalising Or de-professionalising teachers in England? British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 119–143.10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.10.4324/9780203014035
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2013). Knowledge, judgment and the curriculum: On the past, present and future of the idea of the Practical. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 684–696.10.1080/00220272.2013.798839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhauser, M., & Lesaux, N. (2015). Exercising a bounded autonomy: Novice and experienced teachers’ adaptations to curriculum materials in an age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1088065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (1993). Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 1–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. (2001). Collective sense-making about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.10.3102/01623737023002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., Mata, W., & Choi, L. (2013). The embeddedness of teachers’ social networks: Evidence from a study of mathematics reform. Sociology of Education, 86(4), 311–342.10.1177/0038040713501147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M. (2013). Joseph Schwab, curriculum, curriculum studies and educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 622–639.10.1080/00220272.2013.798838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2013). Teacher agency in educational reform: Lessons from social networks research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3–32). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. (2004). Conclusion: The problem of stakes in performance-based accountability systems. In S. Fuhrman & R. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 274–296). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. (2005). Agency, reciprocity and accountability in democratic education. In S. Fuhrman & M. Lazerson (Eds.), Institutions of American democracy: The public schools (pp. 277–301). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2000). Rethinking democracy and education: Towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 305–313.10.1080/002202700182772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2006a). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520.10.1080/00220270600670775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2006b). Introduction: Jürgen Habermas and education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 499–501.10.1080/00220270600607090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2016). On moral education through deliberative communication. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 58–76.10.1080/00220272.2015.1051119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 117–131.10.1177/1474904115608387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnigan, K., Daly, A., & Che, J. (2013). Systemwide reform in districts under pressure. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 476–497.10.1108/09578231311325668
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, F. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (2007). Introduction: Can standards-based reform help reduce the poverty gap in education? In A. Gamoran (Ed.), Standards- based reform and the poverty gap: Lessons for No Child Left Behind (pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J., & Farrell, L. (2014). Remaking the professional teacher: Authority and curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 634–655.10.1080/00220272.2013.854410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. (2014). Writing up qualitative research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 658–676). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2013). Education, professionalism, and the quest for accountability: Hitting the target but missing the point. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action—Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1990). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., Schwartz, H., Stecher, B., & Steele, J. (2013). Improving accountability through expanded measures of performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 453–475.10.1108/09578231311325659
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2012). The politics of teacher professional development: Policy, research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., Ronnerman, K., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2017). Transforming professional learning: educational action research in practice. European Educational Research Journal, 1–21, doi:10.1177/1474904117690409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattam, R., & Howard, N. (2003). Engaging lifeworlds: Public curriculum and community building. In A. Reid & P. Thomson (Eds.), Rethinking public education: Towards a public curriculum (pp. 75–94). Flaxton: Post Pressed.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R., & Collins, G. (2017). Accountability and control in American schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 75–95.10.1080/00220272.2016.1205142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, H. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551–567.10.1080/00220270010016874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalizing educational accountabilities. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Thompson, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). National testing from an Australian perspective. In B. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maroy, C., Pons, X., & Depuy, C. (2017). Vernacular globalisations: Neo-statist accountability policies in France and Quebec education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 100–122.10.1080/02680939.2016.1239841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K., Niemann, D., & Telteman, J. (2016). Effects of international assessments in education—A multidisciplinary review. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 516–522.10.1177/1474904116668886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2013). The allure of order: High hopes, dashed expectations, and the troubled quest to remake American schooling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2013). Teacher professional learning in a neoliberal age: Audit, professionalism and identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F., King, B., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications for restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 41–74.10.17763/haer.67.1.14141916116656q6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paananen, M., Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2016). Hybridisation or ousterisation? The case of local accountability policy in Finnish early childhood education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(5), 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. (2007). NCLB lessons learned: Implications for reauthroization. In A. Gamoran (Ed.), Standards- based reform and the poverty gap: Lessons for No Child Left Behind (pp. 286–324). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Thomson, P. (2003). Introduction: What’s public about curriculum. In A. Reid & P. Thomson (Eds.), Rethinking public education: Towards a public curriculum (pp. xiii–xxv). Flaxton: Post Pressed.
   Google Scholar
• Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative research: A personsal skills approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. (1970/2013). The practical: A language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 591–621.10.1080/00220272.2013.809152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., & Wahlström, N. (2016). Curriculum on the European policy agenda: Global transitions and learning outcomes from transnational and national points of view. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 271–278.10.1177/1474904116647060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.10.3102/0002831207306859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2013). Reading Schwab’s the ‘Practical’ as an invitation to a curriculum enquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 640–651.10.1080/00220272.2013.795246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. (2010). Speaking ‘over’ performativity. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(3), 275–294.10.1080/00220620.2010.492960
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar