References
- Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Kluwer.
- Andersson, A., & Österling, L. (2019). Democratic actions in school mathematics and the dilemma of conflicting values. In P. Clarkson, W. T. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education: Scanning and scoping the territory (pp. 69–88). Springer Open.
- Arnold, J., & Clarke, D. J. (2014). What is ‘agency’? Perspectives in science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.825066
- Artigue, M. (1999). The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: Crucial questions for contemporary research in education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 46(11), 1377–1385.
- Artigue, M., Bosch, M., Doorman, M., Juhász, P., Kvasz, L., & Maass, K. (2020). Inquiry based mathematics education and the development of learning trajectories. Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, 18(3), 63–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5485/TMCS.2020.0505
- Bailey, J. (2014). Mathematical investigations for supporting pre-service primary teachers repeating a mathematics education course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n2.8
- Bishop, A. J. (1991). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Kluwer.
- Blair, A. (2014). Inquiry maths: An idea whose time has come. Mathematics Teaching, 240, 32–35.
- Boaler, J., & Selling, S. K. (2017). Psychological imprisonment or intellectual freedom? A longitudinal study of contrasting school mathematics approaches and their impact on adults’ lives. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 78–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0078
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bromage, A. (2006). The management of planned change: An interdisciplinary perspective. In L. Hunt, A. Bromage, & B. Tomkinson (Eds.), The realities of change in higher education: Interventions to promote learning and teaching (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
- Brown, R. (2009). Teaching for social justice: Exploring the development of student agency through participation in the literacy practices of a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9110-7
- Buhagiar, M. A. (2004). ‘How appropriate is this task for my class?’ Exploring teachers’ classroom decision-making processes as they waver between ‘practical’ and ‘ideal’ positions. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies,9(2), 83–108. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/19310
- Buhagiar, M. A., & Murphy, R. (2008). Teachers’ assessments of students’ learning of mathematics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(2), 169–182.
- Calleja, J. (2020). A spiral pattern investigation: Making mathematical connections. The Mathematical Gazette, 104(560), 262–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/mag.2020.49
- Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Liao, L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.1.0040
- Coles, A., & Brown, L. (2016). Task design for ways of working: Making distinctions in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 149–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9337-4
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Dalton, S. S., & Tharp, R. G. (2002). Standards for pedagogy: Research, theory and practice. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 181–194). Blackwell.
- Darbyshire, P., MacDougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056921
- Deneen, C., & Boud, D. (2014). Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 577–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.859654
- Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. (2006). Using constructive teaching to improve upon an unproductive didactical contract during chemistry lesson. Science Education International, 17(2), 109–121.
- Directorate for Quality and Standards in Education. (DQSE). (2015). Educators’ guide for pedagogy and assessment using a learning outcome approach: Mathematics. https://www.schoolslearningoutcomes.edu.mt/en/subjects/mathematics
- Drew, V., & Mackie, L. (2011). Extending the constructs of active learning: Implications for teachers’ pedagogy and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 22(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.627204
- Durrant, J., & Holden, G. (2006). Teachers leading change: Doing research for school improvement. Paul Chapman.
- Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Gardner, D., & McCormack Steinmetz, A. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. The Falmer Press.
- Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.825066
- Ernest, P. (2010). Reflections on theories of learning. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education (pp. 39–47). Springer.
- Foster, C. (2013). Mathematical études: Embedding opportunities for developing procedural fluency within rich mathematical contexts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 765–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.770089
- Foster, C. (2014). Minimal interventions in the teaching of mathematics. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9407
- Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
- Frobisher, L. (1994). Problems, investigations and an investigative approach. In A. Orton & G. Wain (Eds.), Issues in teaching mathematics (pp. 150–173). Cassell.
- Grima, G., & Chetcuti, D. (2003). Current practices in educational assessment in Maltese schools. Journal of Maltese Education Research, 1(2), 57–94. http://www.educ.um.edu.mt/jmer
- Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Continuum.
- Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. The Falmer Press.
- Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1992). Student resistance to control. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 85–100). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Baris Gunersel, A., & Simpson, H. (2008). Overcoming student resistance to a teaching innovation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), article 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020105
- Klemenčič, M. (2015). What is student agency? An ontological exploration in the context of research on student engagement. In M. Klemenčič, S. Bergan, & R. Primožič (Eds.), Student engagement in Europe: Society, higher education and student governance (Council of Europe Higher Education Series No. 20) (pp. 11–29). Council of Europe.
- Klemenčič, M. (2017). From student engagement to student agency: Conceptual considerations of European policies on student-centered learning in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 30(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0034-4
- Leikin, R. (2004). Towards high quality geometrical tasks: Reformulation of a proof problem. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , University of Bergen, (pp. 209–216). Bergen, Norway: IGPME.
- Lerman, S. (2010). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 99–109). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_11
- Lindgren, R., & McDaniel, R. (2012). Transforming online learning through narrative and student agency. Educational Technology and Society, 15(4), 344–355. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.4.344
- Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 779–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0
- Macedo, D. (2000). Introduction. In P. Freire (Ed.), Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed., pp. 11–27). Continuum.
- Mamo, J. (forthcoming). Do girls count? Gender differences in mathematics. Malta Review of Educational Research.
- Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4
- Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2006). Designing and using mathematical tasks (2nd ed.). Tarquin.
- McIntyre, A. (2006). Activist research and student agency in universities and urban communities. Urban Education, 41(6), 628–647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906292510
- Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and Education, 17(2), 89–105.
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Ministry for Education and Employment (MEDE). (2012). A national curriculum framework for all 2012. MEDE.
- Munday, I. (2009). Heidegger, ethics and ontological education: A critical response to Nobuhiko Itani’s paper ‘Beyond the self’. Record of Clinical-Philosophical Pedagogy, 9, 76–87. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/197062
- National Commission for Further and Higher Education (NCFHE). (2018). Further and higher education statistics 2015-2016. NCFHE.
- Nivera, G. C. (2017). What happens when teachers and students are introduced to mathematical investigations: An exploratory study. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18(3), 333–345. http://www.cimt.org.uk/ijmtl/index.php/IJMTL/article/view/90
- Ollerton, M., & Watson, A. (2001). Inclusive mathematics 11–18. Continuum.
- Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 253–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
- Phillips, D. C. (2000). Constructivism as an epistemology and philosophy of education. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 17–18). National Society for the Study of Education.
- Ponte, J. P. (2001). Investigating mathematics and learning to teach mathematics. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 53–72). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0828-0_3
- Ponte, J. P. (2007). Investigations and explorations in the mathematics classroom. ZDM – The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 419–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0054-z
- Prestage, S., & Perks, P. (2001). Adapting and extending secondary mathematics activities: New tasks for old. David Fulton.
- Rodríguez, J. I., & Cai, D. A. (1994). When your epistemology gets in the way: A response to Sprague. Communication Education, 43(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529409378985
- Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2017). How does lesson structure shape teacher perceptions of teaching with challenging tasks? Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 30–46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152737
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (2012). Problematizing the didactic triangle. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 44(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0395-0
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Research in mathematics education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 497–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16658650
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (2018). An introduction to the Teaching for Robust Understanding (TRU) framework. Graduate School of Education.
- Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith.
- Seidel, S. B., & Tanner, K. D. (2013). “What if students revolt?” – Considering student resistance: Origins, options, and opportunities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-09-0190
- Simon, M. A. (2009). Amidst multiple theories of learning in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 477–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.5.0477
- Simons, P. R. J. (1997). Definitions and theories of active learning. In D. Stern & G. L. Huber (Eds.), Active learning for students and teachers: Reports from eight countries (pp. 19–39). OECD/Pater Lang.
- Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of investigation. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(4), 123–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652747
- Solomon, Y. (2007). Experiencing mathematics classes: Ability grouping, gender and the selective development of participative identities. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 8–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.07.002
- Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 171–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9384-z
- Sprott, R. A. (2019). Factors that foster and deter advanced teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 321–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.001
- Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
- Stinson, D. W. (2004). Mathematics as “gate-keeper” (?): Three theoretical perspectives that aim toward empowering all children with a key to the gate. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 8–18. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/msit_facpub/19/
- Stone, L. (1996). The social construction of mathematical knowledge: Presented problems in mathematics classrooms. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5070/L471005235
- Sullivan, P., & Mornane, A. (2014). Exploring teachers’ use of, and students’ reactions to, challenging mathematics tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0089-0
- Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 147–165). RoutledgeFalmer.
- Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y
- Tinnell, T. L., Ralston, P. A. S., Tretter, T. R., & Mills, M. (2019). Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5
- von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Watkins, C., Carnell, E., & Lodge, C. (2007). Effective learning in classrooms. Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
- Willis, J. (2010). Learning to love math: Teaching strategies that change student attitudes and get results. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Wright, P., Fejzo, A., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Challenging inequity in mathematics education by making pedagogy more visible to learners. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1775320
- Zaslavsky, O., & Sullivan, P. (Eds). (2011). Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics: Tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media.