Classroom observation as a means of understanding teaching quality: towards a shared language of teaching?

References

• Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, M., & Ingerman, A. (2017). Multiple theoretical lenses as an analytical strategy in researching group discussions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1245657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgnakke, K. (Ed.). (1979). Project skolesprog: Skoledage 1–2 [project school language: Schooldays 1-2]. GMT & Unge Pædagoger.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., Sherman, M., & Boston, M. (2019). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09445-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brataas, G., & Jenset, I. S. (2022). From critical to generative moments when learning to provide instructional scaffolding during fieldwork. Department Name, Institution Name. ( Manuscript submitted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Brevik, L., & Rindal, U. (2020). Language use in the classroom: Balancing target language exposure with the need for other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 328–375). McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Callewaert, S., & Nilsson, B. A. (1974). Samhället, skolan och skolans inre arbete [Scholing, society and the inner work of schooling]. Lund Books and Journals.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C., & Praetorius, A. (2018). Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: Setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. (2006). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world (Vol. 2). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (Vol. 1). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2018). Practices that cross disciplines: Revisiting explicit instruction in elementary mathematics and English language arts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 324 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Grossman, P. (2016). Respecting complexity in measures of teaching: Keeping students and schools in focus. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, H., & Neumann, K. (2012). Video analysis as a tool for understanding science instruction. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe: Retrospective and prospective (pp. 115–139). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2001). Facing the problem of unbalanced development of knowledge across sectors and fields: The case of the knowledge base in primary education. Research Policy, 30(9), 1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00167-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2004). The economics of knowledge. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Hargreaves, D. (2003). The production of knowledge in different sectors: A model and some hypotheses. London Review of Education, 1(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460306689
   Google Scholar
• Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16(16), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitomer, D. H. (2009). Measurement issues and assessment of teaching quality. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1086/669901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., Chui, A.M. -Y., Wearne, D., Smith, M., Kersting, N., Manaster, A., Tseng, E., Etterbeck, W., Manaster, C., Gonzales, P., & Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Education Statistics Quarterly, 5(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.2.d11511403715u376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B., & Meyer, M. A. (2011). Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe. Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in the classroom. Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
   Google Scholar
• Janík, T., & Seidel, T. (2009). The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., Staiger, D. O., McCaffrey, D., Cantrell, S., Archer, J., Buhayar, S., & Parker, D. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Measures of Effective Teaching Project. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540960.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (1998). Klasseromsforskning på norsk! [Classroom Research in Norway]. Ad Notam Gyldendal Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2009). Challenges in strategies for complexity reduction in video studies. Experiences from the PISA+ study: A video study of teaching and learning in Norway. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 61–83). Waxmann Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2015). Introduction: Studying interaction and instructional patterns in classrooms. In K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, & A. Roe (Eds.), Teaching and learning in lower secondary schools in the era of PISA and TIMSS (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2022a). The Use of Video Capturing in International Large-Scale Assessment Studies: methodological and theoretical considerations. In T. Nilsen, A. S. Piatak, & J. E. Gustafsson (Eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Large Scale Studies in Education: Perspectives Methods and Findings Springer Education.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2022b). Coding manuals as way of strengthening programmatic research in classroom studies. In Ligozat (Ed.), Didactics in a Changing World. European Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Curriculum Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., & Blikstad Balas, M. (2018). Observation manuals as lenses to classroom teaching: Pitfalls and possibilities. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117703228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klette, K., Blikstad Balas, M., & Roe, A. (2017). Linking instruction and student achievement: Research design for a new generation of classroom studies. Acta Didactica Norge, 11(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.4729
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., Luoto, J. M. R., & Blikstad Balas, M. (2021b). Linking Instruction and Student Achievement (LISA) study Technical Report. University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., Magnusson, C. S., Luoto, J. M., & Blikstad Balas, M. (2022). Features of language arts classrooms with high-level classroom discourse across Nordic contexts. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA) annual meeting, San Diego, April 21-26.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K., Roe, A., & Blikstad Balas, M. (2021a). In K. Klette, M. Tengberg, & M. Blikstad Balas, (Eds.), Observational scores as predictors for student achievement gains Oslo University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, J., & Sammons, P. (2010). Effective teaching: A review of research and evidence. CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahn, L. C., & Klette, K. (2022). Reactivity beyond contamination? An integrative literature of video studies in educational research. International Journal of Research and Methods in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2094356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligozat, F. (2011). The determinants of the joint action in didactics: The text-action relationship in teaching practice. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 157–176). Barbara Budrich Publishers. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33638.06728
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher. A sociological perspective. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luoto, J. M., Klette, K., & Blikstad Balas, M. (2022). Possible biases in observation systems when applied across contexts: Conceptualizing, operationalizing and sequencing instructional quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09394-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (2003). On the uneven evolution of human know how. Research Policy, 32(6), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00093-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. -E. (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes: Relationships across countries, cohorts and time (Vol. 2). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, A., Tengberg, M., Svanbjörnsdóttir, B., Gabrielsen, I., Blikstad Balas, M., & Klette, K. (2021). Function and use of literary texts in Nordic schools. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature. https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.02.10
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M., & Klette, K. (2012). Teaching activities and language use in science classrooms: Categories and levels of analysis as tools for interpretation. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 181–202). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2000) . A new economy? The changing role of innovation and information technology in growth. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (Ed.). (2020). Global teaching InSights: A video study of teaching. https://doi.org/10.1787/20d6f36b-en
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, D. (2020). The rationale of the study Understanding and measuring mathematics teaching practice. Global Teaching InSights: A video study of teaching (pp. 17–32). https://doi.org/10.1787/20d6f36b-en
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system: Forms, pre-K-3. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. -K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: Looking back and looking forward. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. -K., Rogh, W., Bell, C., & Klieme, E. (2019). Methodological challenges in conducting international research on teaching quality using standardized observations. In L. Suter, E. Smith, & B. D. Denman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of comparative studies in education (pp. 269–288). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Jean, M. (2015). To what extent do student perceptions of classroom quality predict teacher value added? In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems (pp. 170–202). Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2016). Teacher evaluation in American schools. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1159–1217). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2014). School, teaching, and system effectiveness: Some comments on three state-of-the-art reviews. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2011). Lessons from the world on effective teaching and learning environments. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110386966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2006). Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: Findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selling, A. J. V., Klette, K., & Nortvedt, G. A. (2022). Teacher Enactment of Goals in Nordic Mathematics Classrooms.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurjónsson, J. Ö. (2021, September 6–10). Challenges in analysing cognitive activation mathematics instruction from video [Paper presentation]. ECER Conference 2021, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stovner, R. B. (2021). Teacher feedback on procedural skills, conceptual understanding, and mathematical practices: A video study in lower secondary mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuhlman, M. W., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Why should we use classroom observation. Teachstone.
   Google Scholar
• Svanbjörnsdóttir, B., Zophoníasdóttir, S., & Gísladóttir, B. (2022). Stated purpose and use of feedback in Icelandic lower secondary classrooms: Results from video recordings. Department Name, Institution Name. ( Manuscript submitted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Tengberg, M., Blikstad Balas, A., & Roe, M. (2022). Missed opportunities of text-based instruction: What characterizes learning of interpretations if strategies are not taught and students not challenged. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengberg, M., van Bommel, J., Nilsberth, M., Walkert, M., & Nissen, A. (2021). The quality of instruction in Swedish lower secondary language arts and mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 760–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1910564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. C. (2018). Rater performance standards for classroom observation instruments. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18785623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., & Ronfeldt, M. (2020). Monitoring rater quality in observational systems: Issues due to unreliable estimates of rater quality. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar