631
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Who Should Be at the Top of Bottom-Up Development? A Case-Study of the National Rural Livelihoods Mission in Rajasthan, India

&
Pages 1858-1877 | Received 16 Aug 2016, Accepted 02 May 2017, Published online: 31 May 2017

References

  • Aiyar, S. A. , Narayan, D. , & Raju, K. (2007).Empowerment through self-help groups. In D. Narayan-Parker & E. E. Glinskaya (Eds.), Ending poverty in south Asia: Ideas that work (pp. 104–135). Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
  • Baiocchi, G. , Heller, P. , Silva, M. K. , & Silva, M. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil . Stanford University Press.
  • Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 16(4), 185–205. doi:10.1257/089533002320951037
  • Barron, P. , Diprose, R. , & Woolcock, M. J. (2011). Contesting development: Participatory projects and local conflict dynamics in Indonesia . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Bhargava, P. (2007). Civil society in Rajasthan. In V. S. Vyas , S. Acharya , S. Singh & V. Sagar  (Eds.), Rajasthan: The quest for sustainable development (pp. 257–281). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.
  • Chen, M. , Renana, J. , Kanbur, R. , & Richards, C. (2008). Membership based organisations of the poor: Concepts, experience and policy. In M. Chen , R. Jhabvala , R. Kanbur , & C. Richards (Eds), Membership based organisations of the poor (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.
  • Cornell, S. , & Kalt, J. P. (2000). Where’s the glue? Institutional and cultural foundations of American Indian economic development. The Journal of Socio-Economics , 29(5), 443–470. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00080-9
  • Deininger, K. , & Liu, Y. (2009). Longer-term economic impacts of self-help groups in India (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4885). Washington DC: World Bank.
  • Desai, R. M. , & Joshi, S. (2014). Collective action and community development: Evidence from self-help groups in rural India. The World Bank Economic Review , 28(3), 492–524. doi:10.1093/wber/lht024
  • Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika , 80(1), 27–38. doi:10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
  • Fox, J. (1993). The politics of food in Mexico: State power and social mobilization . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Galab, S. , & Rao, N. C. (2003). Women’s self-help groups, poverty alleviation and empowerment. Economic and Political Weekly , 38(12/13), 1274–1283.
  • Mansuri, G. , & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work?. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
  • Perry, H. B. , Zulliger, R. , & Rogers, M. M. (2014). Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: An overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annual Review of Public Health , 35, 399–421. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354
  • Potter, J. G. (Ed.). (2001). Devolution and globalisation: Implications for local decision-makers (Vol. 498). OECD Publishing.
  • Rajvansi, J. (2007). NGOs and Academics. In V. S. Vyas , S. Acharya , S. Singh & V. Sagar (Eds.), Rajasthan: The quest for sustainable development (pp. 325–346). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.
  • Rao, V. (2008). Symbolic public goods and the coordination of collective action: A comparison of local development in India and Indonesia. In P. Bardhan & I. Ray (Eds.), The contested commons: Conversations between economists and anthropologists . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Singh, P. (2016). How solidarity works for welfare: Subnationalism and social development in India . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Treisman, D. (2007). The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralization . NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Unnithan, M. , & Heitmeyer, C. (2014). Challenges in ‘translating’ human rights: Perceptions and practices of civil society actors in western India. Development and Change , 45(6), 1361–1384. doi:10.1111/dech.2014.45.issue-6
  • World Bank (2013). India – Rajasthan rural livelihoods project ( RRLP ): P102329 – Implementation status & results (Working Paper No: ISR9495). Washington DC: Author.
  • Ziegfeld, A. , & Tudor, M. (2015). How opposition parties sustain single-party dominance lessons from India. Party Politics . doi:10.1177/1354068815593455

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.