One Plus One can be Greater than Two: Evaluating Synergies of Development Programmes in Malawi

References

• Andersson, C., Mekonnen, A., & Stage, J. (2011). Impacts of the productive safety net program in Ethiopia on livestock and tree holdings of rural households. Journal of Development Economics. 94, 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, C., Pauw, K., & Thurlow, J. (2016). The economy-wide impacts and risks of Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Programme. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 98, 962–980. doi:10.1093/ajae/aav048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfaw, S., Davis, B., Dewbre, J., Handa, S., & Winters, P. (2014). Cash transfer programme, productive activities and labour supply: Evidence from a randomised experiment in Kenya. The Journal of Development Studies. 50, 1172–1196. doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.919383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfaw, S., Pickmans, P., & Davis, B. (2015). Productive Impact of Malawi’s Social Cash Transfer Programme – Midline Report. A From Protection to Production (PtoP) report. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2016). B. Davis, S. Handa, N. Hypher, N. Winder-Rossi, P. Winters, & J. Yablonski (Eds.), From evidence to action: The story of cash transfers and impact evaluation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beegle, K., Galasso, E., & Goldberg, J. (2017). Direct and indirect effects of Malawi’s public works program on food security. Journal of Development Economics. 128, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, R., Covarrubias, K., Davis, B., & Winters, P. (2013). Cash transfer programs and agricultural production: The case of Malawi. Agricultural Economics. 44, 365–378. doi:10.1111/agec.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M., Laajaj, R., & Yang, D. (2014). Subsidies and the persistence of technology adoption: Field experimental evidence from Mozambique (NBER Working Paper, 20465). doi: 10.3386/w20465
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M., Laajaj, R., & Yang, D. (2015). Savings and subsidies, separately and together: Decomposing effects of a bundled anti-poverty programme. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Chirwa, E., & Dorward, A. (2013). Agricultural input subsidy: The recent Malawi experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chirwa, E., Matita, M., & Dorward, A. (2011). Factors influencing access to agricultural input subsidy coupons in Malawi. Working Paper No. 027. Futures Agricultures.
   Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, K., Davis, B., & Winters, P. (2012). From protection to production: Productive impacts of the Malawi Social Cash Transfer scheme. Journal of Development Effectiveness. 4, 50–77. doi:10.1080/19439342.2011.641995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daidone, S., Davis, B., Dewbre, J., Miguelez, B., Niang, O., & Pellerano, L. (2017). Linking agriculture and social protection for food security: The case of Lesotho. Global Food Security. 12, 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, S., Marshall, J., MacAskill, J., & Pelham, L. (2005). Making cash count: Lessons from cash transfer schemes in East and Southern Africa for supporting the most vulnerable children and households. London: Save the Children UK, HelpAge International and Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dorward, A., & Chirwa, E. (2011). The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 9, 232–247. doi:10.3763/ijas.2010.0567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorward, A., Chirwa, E., Matita, M., Mhango, W., Zvula, T. E., & Thome, K. (2013). Evaluation of the 2012/2013 Farm Input Subsidy Programme. Malawi: Final Report Undertaken for the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security.
   Google Scholar
• Duflo, E., Kremer, M., & Robinson, J. (2011). Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review. 101, 2350–2390. doi:10.1257/aer.101.6.2350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, F., & Maliro, D. (2013). Fertiliser subsidies and social cash transfers as complementary or competing instruments for reducing vulnerability to hunger: The case of Malawi. Development Policy Review. 31, 575–596. doi:10.1111/dpr.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. (2015). The State of Food and Agriculture. Social Protection and Agriculture: Breaking the cycle of rural poverty. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2011). Impact evaluation in practice (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Handa, S., Angeles, G., Abdoulayi, A., Mvula, P., & Tsoka, M. (2015b). Malawi social cash transfer programme midline impact evaluation report. Chapel Hill: University of North Caroline.
   Google Scholar
• Handa, S., Park, M., Darko, R., Osei-Akoto, I., Davis, B., & Daidone, S. (2013). Livelihood empowerment against poverty impact evaluation. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Handa, S., Seidenfeld, D., Davis, B., & Tembo, G. (2015a). The social and productive impacts of Zambia’s child grant. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 35, 357–387. doi:10.1002/pam.21892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelm, L. (2016). The impact of cash transfers on food security. Innocenti Research Briefs no. 2016-04. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose–response functions. Biometrika. 87, 706–710. doi:10.1093/biomet/87.3.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Independent Evaluation Group. (2011). Evidence and lessons learned from impact evaluations on social safety nets. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Jayne, T., & Rashid, S. (2013). Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Economics. 44, 547–562. doi:10.1111/agec.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayne, T., & Ricker-Gilbert, J. (2011). What are the enduring effects of fertilizer subsidy programmes on recipient farm households? Evidence from Malawi (Staff Paper Series 09). East Lansing, MI: Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kilic, T., Whitney, E., & Winters, P. (2013). Decentralized beneficiary targeting in large-scale development programmes: Insights from the Malawi Farm Input Subsidy Programme (Policy Research Working Paper 6713). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Marenya, P., & Barrett, C. (2009). State-conditional fertilizer yield response on western Kenyan farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 91, 991–1006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, N., & Jayne, T. (2013). Fertiliser subsidies and smallholder commercial fertiliser purchases: Crowding out, leakage and policy implications for Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 64, 558–582. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matita, M., & Chirwa, E. (2014). Targeting in Social Cash Transfer and Farm Input Subsidy programmes in Malawi: should they be harmonized? Document undertaken for the Ministry of Agriculture Irrigation and Water Development, Funded by DFID. London: School of Oriental & African Studies - University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., Tsoka, M., & Reichert, K. (2010). Impacts on children of cash transfers in Malawi. In S. Handa, S. Devereux, & D. Webb (Eds.), Social protection for Africa’s children. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• OPM. (2013a). Qualitative research and analyses of the economic impact of cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Ghana Country Case Study Report.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• OPM. (2013b). Qualitative research and analyses of the economic impact of cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Kenya Country Case Study Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
   Google Scholar
• Pauw, K., Beck, U., & Mussa, R. (2014). Did rapid smallholder-led agricultural growth fail to reduce rural poverty?: Making sense of Malawi’s poverty puzzle. WIDER Working Paper 2014/123. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
   Google Scholar
• Ricker-Gilbert, J., & Jayne, T. S. (2012, 18–24 August). Do fertilizer subsidies boost staple crop production and reduce poverty across the distribution of smallholders in Africa? Quantile regression results from Malawi. Selected Paper for the Triennial Meeting of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, Foz Do Iguacu, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T. S., & Chirwa, E. (2011). Subsidies and crowding out: A double-hurdle model of fertilizer demand in Malawi. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 93, 26–42. doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non- randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701. doi:10.1037/h0037350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2012, April 19). How Malawi fed its own people. New York Times Op-Ed piece.
   Google Scholar
• Saweda, L., Liverpool-Tasie, L. S., & Takeshima, H. (2013). Input promotion within a complex subsector: Fertilizer in Nigeria. Agricultural Economics. 44, 581–594. doi:10.1111/agec.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thome, K., Taylor, E., & Filipski, M. (2014). The local economy impacts of FISP. (Working Paper on the Evaluation of the 2013/2014 Farm Input Subsidy Programme). Malawi, Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Tirivayi, N., Knowles, M., & Davis, B. (2016). The interaction between social protection and agriculture: A review of evidence. Global Food Security. 10, 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Tittonell, P., & Giller, K. (2013). When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research. 143, 76–90. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S., Daidone, S., Ruvalcaba, M. A., Prifti, E., Handa, S., Davis, B., … Seidenfeld, D. (2016). Impact of cash transfer programs on food security and nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: A cross-country analysis. Global Food Security. 11, 72–83. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.07.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uysal, S. D. (2015). Doubly Robust estimation of causal effects with multivalued treatments: An application to the returns to schooling. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 30, 763–786. doi:10.1002/jae.2386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veras Soares, F., Knowles, M., Daidone, S., & Tirivayi, N. (2017). Combined effects and synergies between agricultural and social protection interventions: What is the evidence so far? Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141, 1281–1301. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture For Development. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar