402
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Land Inequality and Workfare Policies

ORCID Icon &
Pages 891-914 | Received 01 Aug 2020, Accepted 14 Nov 2021, Published online: 19 Jan 2022

References

  • Agriculture Census Report. (2005). All India report on agriculture census 2005-06 (Technical report). Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation. New Delhi, India.
  • Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.
  • Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.
  • Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151–184.
  • Anderson, S., Francois, P., & Kotwal, A. (2015). Clientelism in Indian villages. The American Economic Review, 105(6), 1780–1816.
  • Arora, A. (2020). Election by community consensus: Effects on political selection and governance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00970
  • Azar, J., Marinescu, I., & Steinbaum, M. (2020, May). Labor market concentration. Journal of Human Resources, 55(4), 1218–9914R1. Publisher: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. The American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–1213.
  • Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2005). Decentralizing antipoverty programme delivery in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 675–704.
  • Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2012). Political clientelism and capture: Theory and evidence from West Bengal, India (Number 2012/97). UNU-WIDER Working paper. United Nations University.
  • Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2000). Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 389–430.
  • Besley, T., Leight, J., Pande, R., & Rao, V. (2016). Long-run impacts of land regulation: Evidence from tenancy reform in India. Journal of Development Economics, 118, 72–87.
  • Bhattacharya, A., Kar, A., & Nandi, A. (2016). Local institutional structure and clientelistic access to employment: the case of MGNREGS in three states of India. Discussion Papers 16/15, Department of Economics, University of York.
  • Bose, N., & Das, S. (2015). Political reservation for women and delivery of public works program. Review of Development Economics, 22, 203– 219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12336
  • Boustan, L., Ferreira, F., Winkler, H., & Zolt, E. M. (2013). The effect of rising income inequality on Taxation and public expenditures: Evidence from U.S. municipalities and school districts, 1970–2000. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1291–1302.
  • Calvi, R., & Mantovanelli, F. G. (2018, November). Long-term effects of access to health care: Medical missions in colonial India. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 285–303.
  • Chandramohan, C. (1998). Political economy of agrarian conflicts in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(41), 2647–2653.
  • Cinnirella, F., & Hornung, E. (2016). Landownership concentration and the expansion of education. Journal of Development Economics, 121, 135–152.
  • Conley, T. G., Hansen, C. B., & Rossi, P. E. (2012). Plausibly exogenous. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 260–272.
  • Damian, C. (2019). PLAUSEXOG: Stata module to implement Conley et al’s plausibly exogenous bounds. Statistical Software Components, S457832. Boston College Department of Economics.
  • Das, U., & Maiorano, D. (2019). Post-clientelistic initiatives in a patronage democracy: The distributive politics of India’s MGNREGA. World Development, 117, 239–252.
  • Ding, W., Lehrer, S. F., Rosenquist, J. N., & Audrain-mcgovern, J. (2009). The impact of poor health on academic performance: New evidence using genetic markers. Journal of Health Economics, 28(3), 578–597.
  • Dunning, T., & Nilekani, J. (2013). Ethnic quotas and political mobilization: Caste, parties, and distribution in Indian village councils. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 35–56.
  • Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M., & Van de Walle, D. (2012). Does India’s employment guarantee scheme guarantee employment? Economic and Political Weekly, 47(16), 55–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23214599
  • Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 755–776.
  • Faguet, J.-P., Sánchez, F., & Villaveces, M.-J. (2020). The perversion of public land distribution by landed elites: Power, inequality and development in Colombia. World Development, 136, 105036.
  • Galor, O., Moav, O., & Vollrath, D. (2009). Inequality in landownership, the emergence of human-capital promoting institutions, and the great divergence. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 143–179.
  • Gehring, K., & Schneider, S. A. (2018, February). Towards the greater good? EU commissioners’ nationality and budget allocation in the European Union. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(1), 214–239.
  • Government of India. (2013). Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act, 2005, operational guidelines, 4th edition (Technical report). New Delhi, India: Department of Rural Development. Ministry of Rural Development.
  • Gulzar, S., & Pasquale, B. (2016). Politicians, bureaucrats, and development: Evidence from India. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 1–22.
  • Gupta, B., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2016). Local funds and political competition: Evidence from the national rural employment guarantee scheme in India. European Journal of Political Economy, 41, 14–30.
  • Imbert, C., & Papp, J. (2015). Labor market effects of social programmes: Evidence from India’s employment guarantee. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 233–263.
  • Imbert, C. (2012). Decomposing the labor market earnings inequality: The public and private sectors in Vietnam, 1993–2006. The World Bank Economic Review, 27(1), 55–79.
  • Johnson, D. (2009). How do caste, gender and party affiliation of locally elected leaders affect implementation of nrega? Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal. Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal. .
  • Khosla, R. (2011). Caste, politics and public good distribution in India: Evidence from nregs in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(12), 63–69.
  • Klonner, S., & Oldiges, C. (2014). Safety net for India’s poor or waste of public funds? Poverty and welfare in the wake of the world’s largest job guarantee programme. Working Papers 0564, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
  • Kumar, H., & Somanathan, R. (2015). State and district boundary changes in India: 1961-2001. Available at SSRN 2687484. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2687484
  • Maiorano, D., Das, U., & Masiero, S. (2018). Decentralisation, clientelism and social protection programmes: A study of India’s mgnrega. Oxford Development Studies, 46(4), 536–549.
  • Maiorano, D. (2014). The politics of the Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act in Andhra Pradesh. World Development, 58, 95–105.
  • Merfeld, J. D. (2019). Spatially heterogeneous effects of a public works programme. Journal of Development Economics, 136, 151–167.
  • Miguel, E., & Gugerty, M. K. (2005). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2325–2368.
  • Misra, K. (2019, December). Does historical land inequality attenuate the positive impact of India’s employment guarantee programme? World Development, 124, 104662.
  • Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2018). Insiders and outsiders: local ethnic politics and public goods provision (No. w21720). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Muralidharan, K., Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2020). General equilibrium effects of (improving) public employment programmes: Experimental evidence from India. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Nagarajan, H. K., Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P., & Meenakshisundaram, S. (2014). Decentralization and empowerment for rural development. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nath, A. (2015). Bureaucrats and politicians: How does electoral competition affect bureaucratic performance? (Institute for Economic Development (IED) Working Paper 269).
  • Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2013). The marginal rate of corruption in public programmes: Evidence from India. Journal of Public Economics, 104, 52–64.
  • NREGA Operational Guidelines. (2013). Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act 2005 – Operational guidelines, 4th version (Technical report). New Delhi, India: Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Rural Development.
  • Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3221–3252.
  • Oster, E. (2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 187–204.
  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? The American Economic Review, 84(3), 600–621.
  • Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2014). Inequality in the long run. Science, 344(6186), 838–843.
  • Planning Commission . (2003). Report of the task force:Identification of districts for wage and self employment programmes. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.
  • Raabe, K., Birner, R., Sekher, M., Gayathridevi, K., Shilpi, A., Schiffer, E. (2010). How to overcome the governance challenges of implementing nrega (IFPRI discussion papers series (00963)).
  • Ramcharan, R. (2010). Inequality and redistribution: Evidence fromUS counties and states, 1890–1930. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 729–744.
  • Ravallion, M. (2019). Is a decentralized right-to-work policy feasible? NBER Working Papers 25687. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Sheahan, M., Liu, Y., Barrett, C. B., & Narayanan, S. (2018). Preferential resource spending under an employment guarantee: The political economy of mgnregs in Andhra Pradesh. The World Bank Economic Review, 32(3), 44.
  • Sokoloff, K. L., & Engerman, S. L. (2000). History lessons: Institutions, factors endowments, and paths of development in the new world. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 217–232.
  • Van der Weide, R., & Milanovic, B. (2018). Inequality is bad for growth of the poor (but not for that of the rich). The World Bank Economic Review, 32(3), 507–530.
  • World, Bank (2011). Social protection for a changing India: Main Report. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2745
  • Zimmermann, L. (2012). Labor market impacts of a large-scale public works programme: Evidence from the Indian employment guarantee scheme (Working Paper). IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6858, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.