Effective teaching of economics: A constrained optimization problem?

References

• Abeysekera, L., and P. Dawson. 2015. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development 34 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. 2008. Cognitive load theory and the role of learner experience: An abbreviated review for educational practitioners. AACE Journal 16 (4): 425–39.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W. E. 2000. Teaching economics in the 21st century. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (1): 109–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S., and J. Tullis. 2010. What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology 61 (3): 228–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. C., H. L. Roediger, and M. A. McDaniel. 2014. Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., E. J. Marsh, J. P. Slavinsky, and R. G. Baraniuk. 2014. Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review 26 (2): 331–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., E. Vul, D. Rohrer, J. T. Wixted, and H. Pashler. 2008. Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science 19 (11): 1095–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., T. Stelzer, and G. Gladding. 2010. Using multimedia modules to better prepare students for introductory physics lecture. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 6 (1): 010108.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., and R. E. Mayer. 2008. Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement 47 (9): 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M. P. 2006. Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education 90 (6): 1073–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. E. 2015. Bringing imagination back to the classroom: A model for creative arts in economics. International Review of Economics Education 19 (May): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debue, N., and C. van de Leemput. 2014. What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Psychology 5:1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T. 2010. Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science 38 (2): 105–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 4–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. 2008. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine 15 (11): 988–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., F. Kirschner, and F. Paas. 2009. (December 23). Cognitive load theory. https://www.education.com/reference/article/cognitive-load-theory/ (accessed January 23, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. M. 2016. Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, D. 2016. Remembrance of philosophy classes past: Why cognitive science suggests that a brief recap is the best way to start each class day. Teaching Philosophy 39 (3): 279–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., ed. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., and C. M. Donnelly. 1996. Learning with analogy and elaborative interrogation. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (3): 508–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limitations on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63 (2): 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., and R. K. Atkinson. 2003. Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L. 2013. Applying cognitive psychology to education: Translational educational science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., A. L. Putnam, and M. A. Smith. 2011. Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education, ed. J. Mestre, and B. Ross, 1–36. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D. 2012. Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review 24 (3): 355–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., and C. Kürschner. 2007. A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review 19 (4): 469–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkins, S., and M. Maier. 2010. Just-in-time teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12 (2): 257–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1994. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4 (4): 295–312.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2004. Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science 32 (1–2): 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, and F. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 (3): 251–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and L. Kester. 2005. The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, ed. R. E. Mayer, 71–93. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar