The Macro Pedagogy Debate: Teaching DSGE to Undergraduates Symposium

References

• Assa, J. 2017. The financialization of GDP: Implications for economic theory and policy. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. 1984. Macroeconomics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Benes, J., M. Kumhof, and M. Laxton. 2014. Financial crises in DSGE models: A prototype model. IMF Working Paper 14/57. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. 2017. Macroeconomics. 7th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Blecker, R. 2016. Finance, distribution, and the role of government: Heterodox foundations for understanding the crisis. Studies in Political Economy 97 (1): 76–86. doi:10.1080/07078552.2016.1174464.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, W., and D. Soskice. 2014. Macroeconomics: Institutions, instability, and the financial system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, V. V., and P. J. Kehoe. 2008. Response from V. V. Chari and Patrick J. Kehoe. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1): 247–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D. 2003. Muddling through and policy analysis. New Zealand Economics Papers 37 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1080/00779950309544384.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D., P. Howitt, A. Kirman, A. Leijonhufvud, and P. Mehrling. 2008. Beyond DSGE models: Toward an empirically based macroeconomics. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 98 (2): 236–40. doi:10.1257/aer.98.2.236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D., and K. McGoldrick. 2010. Educating economists: The Teagle discussion on reevaluating the undergraduate economics major. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, P., and A. Hughes Hallett. 2014. Volatility transfers between cycles: A theory of why the “Great Moderation” was more mirage than moderation. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper 23/2014. Helsinki, Finland: Bank of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, A. 2009. Editorial: Pluralism in economics education. International Review of Economics Education 8 (2): 6–22. doi:10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30071-2.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, M. 2010. U.S. growth in the decade ahead. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 15685. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Godley, W. 1999. Seven unsustainable processes: Medium-term prospects and policies for the United States and the world. Levy Economics Institute, Strategic Analysis, January. New York: Bard College, Levy Economics Institute. http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/seven-unsustainable-processes (accessed January 11, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Goodhart, C. A. E. 2009. The continuing muddles of monetary theory: A steadfast refusal to face facts. Economica New Series 76 (Supplement 1: Robbins's Essay at 75): 821–30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00790.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. 2016. Macroeconomics. 4th ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, J. W., and V. J. Valcarcel. 2017. What's so great about the great moderation? Journal of Macroeconomics 51 (March): 115–42. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M. 2017. Uncertainty and large swings in activity. NBER Reporter 3 (September): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kirman, A. 1989. The intrinsic limits of modern economic theory: The emperor has no clothes. Economic Journal 99 (Supplement): 126–39. doi:10.2307/2234075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1992. Whom or what does the representative individual represent? Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (2): 117–36. doi:10.1257/jep.6.2.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidler, D. 2017. Economic ideas, the monetary order and the uneasy case for policy rules. Journal of Macroeconomics 54 (Part A, December): 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2018. Rethinking macroeconomic theory before the next crisis. Review of Keynesian Economics 6 (1): 1–21. doi:10.4337/roke.2018.01.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, R., and C. Rogers. 2016. IYLM: A General theory-compatible replacement for ISLM. Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (1): 349–64. doi:10.1093/cje/beu082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2015. Understanding the conceptual flaw in the foundations of dynamic, stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. Working paper. www.researchgate.net/publication/304019612 (Accessed January 11, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2018. The new macroeconomics has no clothes. Review of Keynesian Economics 6 (1): 22–33. doi:10.4337/roke.2018.01.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, D. 2000. Keynesian macroeconomics without the LM curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (2): 149–69. doi:10.1257/jep.14.2.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. Forthcoming. The trouble with macroeconomics. The American Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Setterfield, M. 2018. Can monetary policy survive policy model mis-specification? Model uncertainty and the perils of “policy model complacency.” Metroeconomica 69 (1): 2–15. doi:10.1111/meca.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis-Garcia, M. 2018. Yes we can! Teaching DSGE models to undergraduate students. Journal of Economic Education 49 (3): 226–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. 2008. The state of macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1): 243–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. E. 2012. A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 82 (2): 433–44. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar