For want of a chair: Teaching price formation using a cap and trade game

References

• Barreca, A. I., M. Neidell, and N. J. Sanders. 2017. Long-run pollution exposure and adult mortality: Evidence from the acid rain program NBER Working Paper No. 23524. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J., and W. E. Oates. 1998. The theory of environmental policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkenbach, A. M., D. J. Kaczan, and M. D. Smith. 2017. Catch shares slow the race to fish. Nature 544 (7649): 223–26. doi: 10.1038/nature21728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, R. H., K. A. Brekke, and O. Rogeberg. 2015. Buying the right to do wrong—An experimental test of moral objections to trading emission permits. Resource and Energy Economics 42:110–24. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtraw, D. 1999. Cost savings, market performance and economic benefits of the U.S. Acid Rain Program. In Pollution for sale: Emissions trading and joint implementation, ed. S. Sorrell and J. Skea, 43–62. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Caviglia-Harris, J. L., and R. T. Melstrom. 2015. Airing your dirty laundry: A quick marketable pollution permits game for the classroom. Journal of Economic Education 46 (4): 412–19. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2015.1071217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDP. 2017. Putting a price on carbon: Integrating climate risk into business planning. Technical report. London: Carbon Disclosure Project.
   Google Scholar
• Chestnut, L. G., and D. M. Mills. 2005. A fresh look at the benefits and costs of the US acid rain program. Journal of Environmental Management 77 (3): 252–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 56 (4): 837–77. doi: 10.1086/674872.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, J. R. 2011. The pollution game: A classroom game demonstrating the relative effectiveness of emissions taxes and tradable permits. Journal of Economic Education 42 (1): 70–8. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2011.536491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, C., S. D. Gaines, and J. Lynham. 2008. Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science 321 (5896): 1678–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1159478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie, M. 2006. Do classroom experiments increase learning in introductory microeconomics? Journal of Economic Education 37 (3): 267–88. doi: 10.3200/JECE.37.3.267-288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, J. M., and D. M. Sassoon. 2017. A classroom game on a negative externality correcting tax: Revenue return, regressivity, and the double dividend. Journal of Economic Education 48 (2): 65–73. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1285736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, Y., T. McKinnon, and C. Schulman. 2007. Classroom experiments: Not just fun and games. Economic Inquiry 45 (1): 162–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., C. Marcantonini, and A. Zaklan. 2016. The European Union Emissions Trading System: Ten years and counting. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10 (1): 89–107. doi: 10.1093/reep/rev014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, T. L. N., and B. A. Taylor. 2004. Comparing student achievement across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principles of microeconomics course. Southern Economic Journal 70 (3): 672–93. doi: 10.2307/4135338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouquet, R. 2003. The carbon trading game. Climate Policy 3:S143–S155. doi: 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.09.011.
   Google Scholar
• Fowlie, M., S. P. Holland, and E. T. Mansur. 2012. What do emissions markets deliver and to whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx trading program. American Economic Review 102 (2): 965–93. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.2.965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, K., S. Carattini, and D. Esty. 2017. Lessons from first campus carbon-pricing scheme. Nature 551 (7678): 27. doi: 10.1038/551027a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., and A. R. Schein. 2013. Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: A critical review. Climate Change Economics 04 (03): 1–28. doi: 10.1142/S2010007813500103.
   Google Scholar
• Gourley, P. 2018. Farmer Brown v. Rancher Wyatt: Teaching the Coase theorem. Journal of Economic Education 49 (2): 194–99. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2018.1438864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q., R. Arnason, T. Bjørndal, D. Campbell, H. F. Campbell, C. W. Clark, R. Connor, D. P. Dupont, R. Hannesson, and R. Hilborn. 2006. Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63 (3): 699–710. doi: 10.1139/f05-247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R. W., and R. N. Stavins. 2011. The effect of allowance allocations on cap-and-trade system performance. Journal of Law and Economics 54 (S4): S267–S294. doi: 10.1086/661942.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. 2005. Statistical benefits of individual transferable quotas for valuing natural Capital. Paper presented at EASDI Conference 2005, Prague, Czech Republic. Wellington, NZ: Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C., K. Neuhoff, W. Acworth, D. Burtraw, and F. Jotzo. 2016. The economics of the EU ETS market stability reserve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 80:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintermann, B. 2010. Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A. 1996. Classroom games: Trading in a pit market. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1): 193–203. doi: 10.1257/jep.10.1.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus, V. J. 2018. Institutions and emissions trading in China. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108:468–72. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20181030.
   Google Scholar
• Llavador, H., and M. Giamattei. 2017. Teaching microeconomic principles with smartphones—Lessons from classroom experiments with classEx Working Paper 1584. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Economics and Business.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., M. Muûls, L. B. de Preux, and U. J. Wagner. 2014. Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. American Economic Review 104 (8): 2482–2508. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.8.2482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, R. G., and K. Rogers. 2003. The U.S. experience with the phasedown of lead in gasoline. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, R. G., J. N. Sanchirico, and S. Kerr. 2005. Fishing quota markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (3): 437–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaneuf, D. J., and T. Requate. 2017. A course in environmental economics theory, policy, and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1920. The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, J., G. Bennett, N. Carroll, A. Goldstein, and M. Jenkins. 2018. The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services. Nature Sustainability 1 (3): 136–44. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavins, R. 1998. What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (3): 69–88. doi: 10.1257/jep.12.3.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, T., and E. J. Z. Robinson. 2018. Selection and design of environmental policy instruments. In Handbook of environmental economics, ed. P. Dasgupta, S. Pattanayak, and K. Smith, vol. 4, 231–84. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tietenberg, T. 2003. The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: Lessons for climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 (3): 400–419. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/19.3.400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, D. G., and J. C. House. 2006. BP’s emissions trading system. Energy Policy 34 (15): 2100–2112. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P. 2007. Innovation processes in governance: The development of “emissions trading” as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy 34 (5): 329–43. doi: 10.3152/030234207X228584.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, C. 2006. Data-based active learning in the principles of macroeconomics course: A mock FOMC meeting. Journal of Economic Education 37 (2): 171–77. doi: 10.3200/JECE.37.2.171-177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. State and trends of carbon pricing, June 2019. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar