6,265
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features and Information

The cognitive challenges of effective teaching

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Agarwal, P. K., and P. M. Bain. 2019. Powerful teaching: Unleash the science of learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Agarwal, P. K., H. L. Roediger, M. A. McDaniel, and K. B. McDermott. 2018. How to use retrieval practice to improve learning. http://pdf.retrievalpractice.org/RetrievalPracticeGuide.pdf
  • Ambrose, S. A., M. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ambrose, S. A., and M. C. Lovett. 2014. Prior knowledge is more than content: Skills and beliefs also impact learning. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 7–19. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Angelo and Cross. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Armbruster, B. 2009. Notetaking from lectures. In Handbook of college reading and study strategy research, 2nd ed., ed. R. F. Flippo and D. C. Caverly, 220–48. New York: Routledge.
  • Bain, K. 2004. What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ballen, C. J., C. Wieman, S. Salehi, J. B. Searle, and K. R. Zamudio. 2017. Enhancing diversity in undergraduate science: Self-efficacy drives performance gains with active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education 16 (4): ar56. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344.
  • Barkley, E. F., and C. H. Major. 2016. Learning assessment techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Barnett, S. M., and S. J. Ceci. 2002. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128 (4): 612–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.
  • Benassi, V. A., C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala. 2014. Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Bice, D., E. S. Curtis, W. Geerling, W. Goffe, A. Hoffer, S. Lindahl, M. Maier, B. Peterson, and W. Stock. 2014. Preconceptions of principles students. Mimeo. http://cook.rfe.org/Preconceptions_Bice_et_al_06_2014.pdf
  • Bjork, R. A., J. Dunlosky, and N. Kornell. 2013. Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology 64 (2013): 417–44. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4efb/146e5970ac3a23b7c45ffe6c448e74111589.pdf. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.
  • Blasiman, R. N., J. Dunlosky, and R. A. Rawson. 2017. The what, how much, and when of study strategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behaviour. Memory 25 (6): 784–92. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974.
  • Brady, S. T., B. M. Hard, and J. J. Gross. 2018. Reappraising test anxiety increases academic performance of first-year college students. Journal of Educational Psychology 110 (3): 395–406. doi: 10.1037/edu0000219.
  • Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Brod, G., M. Hasselhorn, and S. A. Bunge. 2018. When generating a prediction boosts learning: The element of surprise. Learning and Instruction 55 (June): 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.013.
  • Busom, I., C. Lopez-Mayan, and J. Panades. 2017. Students’ persistent preconceptions and learning economic principles. Journal of Economic Education 48 (2): 74–92. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1285735.
  • Butler, A. C., A. C. Black-Maier, N. D. Raley, and E. J. Marsh. 2017. Retrieving and applying knowledge to different examples promotes transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology 23 (4): 433–46. doi: 10.1037/xap0000142.
  • Cahill, M. J., M. A. McDaniel, R. F. Frey, K. M. Hynes, M. Repice, J. Zhao, and R. Trousil. 2018. Understanding the relationship between student attitudes and student learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14 (1): 010107-1–010107-16.
  • Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI). 2015. Improving learning by reducing unnecessary mental load. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, CWSEI. http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/files/Cognitive-Load_CWSEI.pdf
  • Carpenter, S. K. 2014. Spacing and interleaving of study and practice. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 131–41. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Cavanagh, A. J., X. Chen, M. Bathgate, J. Frederick, D. I. Hanauer, and M. J. Graham. 2018. Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course. CBE—Life Sciences Education 17 (1): ar10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-06-0107.
  • Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (CESE). 2017. Cognitive load theory: Research that teachers really need to understand. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: CESE. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au//images/stories/PDF/cognitive-load-theory-VR_AA3.pdf.
  • Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (CESE). 2018. Cognitive load theory in practice: Examples for the classroom. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: CESE. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au//images/stories/PDF/Cognitive_load_theory_practice_guide_AA.pdf.
  • Cerbin, W. 2015. Metacognition. In Teaching improvement guide. La Crosse, WI: University of Wisconsin at La Crosse, Center for Advancing Teaching and Learning. https://www.uwlax.edu/catl/guides/teaching-improvement-guide/how-can-i-improve/metacognition/.
  • Chamberland, M., C. St‐Onge, J. Setrakian, L. Lanthier, L. Bergeron, A. Bourget, S. Mamede, H. Schmidt, and R. Rikers. 2011. The influence of medical students’ self‐explanations on diagnostic performance. Medical Education 45 (7): 688–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03933.x.
  • Chandler, P., and J. Sweller. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8 (4): 293–332. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
  • Chew, S. L. 2005. Seldom in doubt but often wrong: Addressing tenacious student misconceptions. In Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology, ed. D. S. Dunn and S. L. Chew, 211–23. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Chew, S. L. 2014. Helping students to get the most out of studying. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 215–24. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Chew, S. L., R. Bartlett, J. Dobbins, E. Y. Hammer, M. Kite, T. Loop, J. McIntyre, and K. A. Rose. 2009. Contextual approach to teaching: Bridging goals and outcomes. In Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline, ed. D. Halpern, 95–112. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Chew, S. L., H. B. Beck, E. K. Houk, E. M. McLung, A. N. Wertenberger, E. A. Haine, M. G. Hardin, and E. C. Schneider. 2018. Trust in and rapport with the teacher as separate components of a successful student mindset. Paper presentation. Annual Conference on Teaching, Phoenix, AZ, October 2018.
  • Chew, S. L., H. S. Halonen, M. A. McCarthy, R. A. R. Gurung, M. J. Beers, R. McEntarffer, and R. E. Landrum. 2018. Practice what we teach: Improving teaching and learning in psychology. Teaching of Psychology 45 (3): 239–45. doi: 10.1177/0098628318779264.
  • Chi, M. T. H. 2013. Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it and the learning outcomes. In International handbook of research on conceptual change, 2nd ed., ed. S. Vosniadou, 49–70. New York: Routledge Press.
  • Chi, M. T., M. Bassok, M. W. Lewis, P. Reimann, and R. Glaser. 1989. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13 (2): 145–82. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1.
  • Chiu, J. L., and M. T. H. Chi. 2014. Supporting self-explanation in the classroom. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 91–103. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Clark, R., F. Nguyen, and J. Sweller. 2006. Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Hoboken, NJ: Pfeiffer.
  • Clement, J. 1982. Student preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics 50 (1): 66–71. doi: 10.1119/1.12989.
  • Cowan, N. 2010. The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science 19 (1): 51–57. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359277.
  • Cox, R. D. 2011. The college fear factor: How students and professors misunderstand one another. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Daniel, D. B., and S. L. Chew. 2013. The tribalism of teaching and learning. Teaching of Psychology 40 (4): 363–67. doi: 10.1177/0098628313501034.
  • Daniel, D. B., and D. Poole. 2009. Learning for life: An ecological approach to pedagogical research. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 4 (1): 91–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01095.x.
  • Day, S., and R. Goldstone. 2012. The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist 47 (3): 153–76. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.696438.
  • Dunlosky, J., and K. A. Rawson. 2015. Practice tests, spaced practice, and successive relearning: Tips for classroom use and for guiding students’ learning. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1 (1): 72–78. doi: 10.1037/stl0000024.
  • Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 14 (1): 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.
  • Ehrlinger, J., and E. A. Shain. 2014. How accuracy in students’ self-perceptions relates to success in learning. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 142–51. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Engle, R. A., D. P. Lam, X. S. Meyer, and S. E. Nix. 2012. How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist 47 (3): 215–31. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.695678.
  • Farrington, C. A. 2013. Academic mindsets as a critical component of deeper learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://www.howyouthlearn.org/pdf/White_Paper_Academic_Mindsets_as_a_Critical_Component_of_Deeper_Learning_Camille_Farrington_April_20_2013.pdf.
  • Farrington, C., M. Roderick, E. Allensworth, J. Nagaoka, T. Keyes, D. Johnson, and N. Beechum. 2012. Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/teaching-adolescents-become-learners-role-noncognitive-factors-shaping-school.
  • Fiorella, L., and R. E. Mayer. 2015. Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fisk, G. D. 2019. Slides for students: The effective use of PowerPoint in education. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34 (10): 906–11.
  • Fried, C. B. 2008. In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education 50 (3): 906–14. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006.
  • Fryberg, S. A., R. Covarrubias, and J. A. Burack. 2013. Cultural models of education and academic performance for Native American and European American students. School Psychology International 34 (4): 439–52. doi: 10.1177/0143034312446892.
  • Gathercole, S. E., and T. P. Alloway. 2007. Understanding working memory: A classroom guide. https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WM-classroom-guide.pdf
  • Gazzaley, A. 2017. The distracted mind—19th distinguished lecture on brain, learning and memory—Dr. Adam Gazzaley. Video. https://youtu.be/b0YSb4D2F9w
  • Gazzaley, A., and L. D. Rosen. 2016. The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Girash, J. 2014. Metacognition and instruction. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 152–68. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Glass, A. L., and M. Kang. 2019. Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology 39 (3): 395–408. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046.
  • Gobet, F. 2005. Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (2): 183–204. doi: 10.1002/acp.1110.
  • Goffe, W. L. 2013. Initial misconceptions in macro principles classes. Mimeo. http://cook.rfe.org/Misconceptions.pdf
  • Grimaldi, P. J., and J. D. Karpicke. 2012. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition 40 (4): 505–13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0.
  • Guiffrida, D. A., and K. Z. Douthit. 2010. The Black student experience at predominantly White colleges: Implications for school and college counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development 88 (3): 311–18. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00027.x.
  • Gulikers, J. T., T. J. Bastiaens, and P. A. Kirschner. 2004. A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 (3): 67–86. doi: 10.1007/BF02504676.
  • Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
  • Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Havighurst, R. J. 1953. Human development and education. Harlow, UK: Longmans, Green and Co.
  • Hinds, P. J. 1999. The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 (2): 205–21. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205.
  • Hora, M. T., and A. K. Oleson. 2017. Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective. International Journal of STEM Education 4 (1): ar1. doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6.
  • Howard-Jones, P. A. 2014. Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 15 (12): 817–24. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817.
  • Keeley, J. W., E. Ismail, and W. Buskist. 2016. Excellent teachers’ perspectives on excellent teaching. Teaching of Psychology 43 (3): 175–79. doi: 10.1177/0098628316649307.
  • Khanna, M. K. 2015. Ungraded pop quizzes: Test enhanced learning without all the anxiety. Teaching of Psychology 42 (2): 174–78. doi: 10.1177/0098628315573144.
  • Kiewra, K. A. 2002. How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice 41 (2): 71–80. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3.
  • King, A. 1992. Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal 29 (2): 303–23. doi: 10.3102/00028312029002303.
  • Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
  • Kornell, N., and B. Finn. 2016. Self-regulated learning: An overview of theory and data. In The Oxford handbook of metamemory, ed. J. Dunlosky and S. K. Tauber, 325–40. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kuznekoff, J. H., S. Munz, and S. Titsworth. 2015. Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education 64 (3): 344–65. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1038727.
  • Levitin, D. J. 2014. The organized mind: Thinking straight in the age of information overload. New York: Dutton.
  • Lilienfeld, S. O. 2010. Confronting psychological misconceptions in the classroom: Challenges and rewards. APS Observer 23 (7): 36–39.
  • Lovett, M. C. 2013. Making exams worth more than the grade. In Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy, ed. M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty, and D. Meizlish, 18–48. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Lyle, K. B., and N. A. Crawford. 2011. Retrieving essential material at the end of lecture improves performance on statistics exams. Teaching of Psychology 38 (2): 94–97. doi: 10.1177/0098628311401587.
  • May, K. E., and A. D. Elder. 2018. Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15 (1): ar13. doi: 10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z.
  • Mayer, R. E. 2014. Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 59–70. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • McCoy, B. 2016. Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class purposes. Journal of Media Education 7 (1): 5–32. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub/90.
  • McDaniel, M. A., and A. C. Butler. 2011. A contextual framework for understanding when difficulties are desirable. In Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork, ed. A. S. Benjamin, 175–98. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Morehead, K., M. G. Rhodes, and S. DeLozier. 2016. Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory 24 (2): 257–71. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.1001992.
  • Morris, C. D., J. D. Bransford, and J. J. Franks. 1977. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 16 (5): 519–33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9.
  • Murphy, P. K., and P. A. Alexander. 2013. Situating text, talk, and transfer in conceptual change. In International handbook of research on conceptual change, 2nd ed., ed. S. Vosniadou, chapter 31. New York: Routledge Press.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). 2016. NSSE Annual Results 2016. Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education. Bloomington, IN: NSSE. https://nsse.indiana.edu/research/annual-results/past-annual-results/nsse-annual-results-2016.html.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). 2017. NSSE Annual Results 2017. Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education. Bloomington, IN: NSSE. https://nsse.indiana.edu/research/annual-results/past-annual-results/nsse-annual-results-2017.html.
  • Nguyen, N., and M. A. McDaniel. 2014. Potent techniques to improve learning from text. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 104–17. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane. 2006. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090.
  • Nuthall, G. 2007. The hidden lives of learners. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Education Research Press.
  • Paas, F., van Gog, T. T., and J. Sweller. 2010. Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review 22 (2): 115–21. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9133-8.
  • Pashler, H., M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork. 2008. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9 (3): 105–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x.
  • Patterson, M. C. 2017. A naturalistic investigation of media multitasking while studying and the effects on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology 44 (1): 51–57. doi: 10.1177/0098628316677913.
  • Pérez, W., R. D. Cortés, K. Ramos, and H. Coronado. 2010. “Cursed and blessed”: Examining the socioemotional and academic experiences of undocumented Latina and Latino college students. New Directions for Student Services 2010 (131): 35–51. doi: 10.1002/ss.366.
  • Perkins, D. N., and G. Salomon. 2012. Knowledge to go: A motivational and dispositional view of transfer. Educational Psychologist 47 (3): 248–58. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.693354.
  • Piolat, A., T. Olive, and R. T. Kellogg. 2005. Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (3): 291–312. doi: 10.1002/acp.1086.
  • Pyc, M. A., P. K. Agarwal, and H. L. Roediger. 2014. Test enhanced learning. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 78–90. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Ravizza, S. M., M. G. Uitvlugt, and K. M. Fenn. 2017. Logged in and zoned out: How laptop internet use relates to classroom learning. Psychological Science 28 (2): 171–80. doi: 10.1177/0956797616677314.
  • Rawson, K. A., J. Dunlosky, and S. M. Sciartelli. 2013. The power of successive relearning: Improving performance on course exams and long-term retention. Educational Psychology Review 25 (4): 523–48. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9240-4.
  • Rey, G. D. 2012. A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive details effect. Educational Research Review 7 (3): 216–37. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003.
  • Rosenshine, B. 2012. Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator 36 (1): 12–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ971753.pdf.
  • Schneider, M., and F. Preckel. 2017. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 143 (6): 565–600. doi: 10.1037/bul0000098.
  • Schwartz, D. L., J. M. Tsang, and K. P. Blair. 2016a. The ABCs of how we learn: 26 scientifically proven approaches, how they work, and when to use them. New York: Norton.
  • Schwartz, D. L., J. M. Tsang, and K. P. Blair. 2016b. Overcoming misconceptions and misplaced reasoning. In The ABCs of how we learn: 26 scientifically proven approaches, how they work, and when to use them, ed. D. L. Schwartz, J. M. Tsang, and K. P. Blair, 260–76. New York: Norton.
  • Shibli, D., and R. West. 2018. Cognitive load theory and its application in the classroom. Impact (issue 2). https://impact.chartered.college/article/shibli-cognitive-load-theory-classroom/
  • Son, J. Y., and M. J. Rivas. 2016. Designing clicker questions to stimulate transfer. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 2 (3): 193–207. doi: 10.1037/stl0000065.
  • Stephens, N. M., M. G. Hamedani, and M. Destin. 2014. Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students' academic performance and all students' college transition. Psychological Science 25 (4): 943–53. doi: 10.1177/0956797613518349.
  • Stiegler-Balfour, J. J., V. A. Benassi, H. Tatsak, and A. Taatjes. 2014. The influence of guiding questions on skilled-and less-skilled readers’ understanding of written discourse. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 293–98. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Sweller, J., J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and F. Paas. 2019. Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review 31 (2): 261–92. doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.
  • Tanner, K. D. 2012. Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education 11 (2): 113–20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.
  • Taylor, A., and P. Kowalski. 2014. Student misconceptions: Where do they come from and what can we do? In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum, ed. V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, and C. M. Hakala, 259–73. Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.
  • Veltre, M. T., K. W. Cho, and J. H. Neely. 2015. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect. Memory 23 (8): 1229–37. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.970196.
  • Walton, G. M., G. L. Cohen, D. Cwir, and S. J. Spencer. 2012. Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (3): 513–32. doi: 10.1037/a0025731.
  • Weinstein, Y., M. Sumeracki, and O. Caviglioli. 2019. Understanding how we learn: A visual guide. New York: Routledge.
  • Willingham, D. 2010. Multitasking.wmv. Video. https://youtu.be/34OZ-dsNkBw
  • Wilson, J. H., R. G. Ryan, and J. L. Pugh. 2010. Professor-student rapport scale predicts student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology 37 (4): 246–51. doi: 10.1080/00986283.2010.510976.
  • Winkelmes, M. A., M. Bernacki, J. Butler, M. Zochowski, J. Golanics, and K. Harriss Weavil. 2016. A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review 18 (12): 31–36. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges & Universities. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/36ea/b10b05ba0b80ad43a86c3b7af29e7972deaa.pdf.
  • Yeager, D. S., and C. S. Dweck. 2012. Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist 47 (4): 302–14. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805.
  • Yeager, D. S., P. Hanselman, G. M. Walton, J. S. Murray, R. Crosnoe, C. Muller, E. Tipton, B. Schneider, C. S. Hulleman, C. P. Hinojosa, et al. 2019. A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature 573 (7774): 364–69. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y.
  • Yeager, D. S., V. Purdie-Vaughns, J. Garcia, N. Apfel, P. Brzustoski, A. Master, W. T. Hessert, M. E. Williams, and G. L. Cohen. 2014. Breaking the cycle of mistrust: Wise interventions to provide critical feedback across the racial divide. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2): 804–24. doi: 10.1037/a0033906.
  • Yeager, D. S., C. Romero, D. Paunesku, C. S. Hulleman, B. Schneider, C. Hinojosa, H. Y. Lee, J. O'Brien, K. Flint, A. Roberts, et al. 2016. Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (3): 374–91. doi: 10.1037/edu0000098.
  • Yin, Y.,. R. J. Shavelson, C. C. Ayala, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, P. R. Brandon, E. M. Furtak, M. K. Tomita, and D. B. Young. 2008. On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education 21 (4): 335–59. doi: 10.1080/08957340802347845.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 82–91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.