References
- Adams, S., M. L. Blackburn, and C. D. Cotti. 2012. Minimum wages and alcohol-related traffic fatalities among teens. Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (3): 828–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00199.
- Allgood, S., and A. Bayer. 2017. Learning outcomes for economists. American Economic Review 107 (5): 660–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171070.
- Ambrose, S. A., M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
- Asai, Y. 2019. Costs of employment and flexible labor demand: Evidence from maternity and parental leave reforms. Available at SSRN. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3362488.
- Bean, J. C. 2011. Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Blair, P. Q., and B. W. Chung. 2018. Job market signaling through occupational licensing. NBER Working Paper No. 24791. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Cohen, A. J., and A. L. Williams. 2019. Scalable, scaffolded writing assignments with online peer review in a large introductory economics course. Journal of Economic Education 50 (4): 371–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2019.1654951.
- Colander, D., and K. McGoldrick. 2009. The economics major as part of a liberal education: The Teagle report. American Economic Review 99 (2): 611–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.611.
- De Jong, T., and W. R. Van Joolingen. 1998. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68 (2): 179–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179.
- Dynarski, S., C. J. Libassi, K. Michelmore, and S. Owen. 2018. Closing the gap: The effect of a targeted, tuition-free promise on college choices of high-achieving, low-income students. NBER Working Paper No. 25349. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Falch, T. 2011. Teacher mobility responses to wage changes: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. American Economic Review 101 (3): 460–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.460.
- Felfe, C., M. Lechner, and P. Thiemann. 2016. After-school care and parents’ labor supply. Labour Economics 42: 64–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.06.009.
- Garnett, R., and K. McGoldrick. 2014. A “big think” approach to government debt: Promoting significant learning in introductory macroeconomics. Review of Political Economy 26 (4): 628–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2014.955353.
- Green, G. P., J. C. Bean, and D. J. Peterson. 2013. Deep learning in intermediate microeconomics: Using scaffolding assignments to teach theory and promote transfer. Journal of Economic Education 44 (2): 142–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2013.770338.
- Hansen, W. L. 2001. Expected proficiencies for undergraduate economics majors. Journal of Economic Education 32 (3): 231–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480109596105.
- He, H., D. Neumark, and Q. Weng. 2019. Do workers value flexible jobs? A field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 25423. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- McCloskey, D. N. 2000. Economical writing. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
- Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
- Santos, J., and A. M. Lavin. 2004. Do as I do, not as I say: Assessing outcomes when students think like economists. Journal of Economic Education 35 (2): 148–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.2.148-161.
- Siegfried, J. J., R. L. Bartlett, W. L. Hansen, A. C. Kelley, D. N. McCloskey, and T. H. Tietenberg. 1991. The status and prospects of the economics major. Journal of Economic Education 22 (3): 197–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1991.10844710.
- Simons, K. D., and J. D. Klein. 2007. The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science 35 (1): 41–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5.
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL). n.d.[a]. Home page. Achievement-Centered Outcomes. https://ace.unl.edu (accessed December 1, 2020).
- ———. n.d.[b]. Institutional objectives & student learning outcomes. Achievement-Centered Outcomes. https://ace.unl.edu/about/outcomes (accessed December 1, 2020).