Low-stakes writing in an active-learning classroom needs focus and feedback to be effective

References

• Almer, E. D., K. Jones, and C. L. Moeckel. 1998. The impact of one-minute papers on learning in an introductory accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (3): 485–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. A., M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, J. C. 2011. Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., and W. L. Goffe. 2018. Beyond the flipped class: The impact of research-based teaching methods in a macroeconomics principles class. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108: 297–301. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20181052.
   Google Scholar
• Callender, A. A., and M. A. McDaniel. 2009. The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 (1): 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., J. B. Gelbach, and D. L. Miller. 2008. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (3): 414–27. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.3.414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and D. L. Miller. 2015. A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 317–72. doi: 10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chizmar, J. F., and A. L. Ostrosky. 1998. The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings. Journal of Economic Education 29 (1): 3–10. doi: 10.1080/00220489809596436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, T. S. 2016. The role of expository writing in mathematical problem solving. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 20 (1): 57–66. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2016.1147803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. H., and E. Mazur. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69 (9): 970–77. doi: 10.1119/1.1374249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, D., and J. Youga. 1986. Using writing as a tool for learning economics. Journal of Economic Education 17 (3): 218–22. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1986.10845169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332 (6031): 862–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. 1994. Writing for learning—Not just for demonstrating learning. Handout, 1–4. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (23): 8410–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffe, W. L., and D. Kauper. 2014. A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. Journal of Economic Education 45 (4): 360–75. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.946547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2016. Significant returns in engagement and performance with a free teaching app. Journal of Economic Education 47 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2015.1106359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, H. R., and R. K. Mallett. 2018. The impact of brief reflective responses on student performance. Active Learning in Higher Education (June): 1–11. doi: 10.1177/1469787418779158.
   Google Scholar
• Imazeki, J. 2014. Bring-your-own-device: Turning cell phones into forces for good. Journal of Economic Education 45 (3): 240–50. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.917898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafar, R. 2016. Writing-to-learn activities to provoke deeper learning in calculus. PRIMUS 26 (1): 67–82. doi: 10.1080/10511970.2015.1053642.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E., and J. Watkins. 2009. Just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. In Just in time teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy, ed. S. Simkins and M. H. Maier, 39–62. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, G. M. 2011. Just-in-time teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2011 (128): 63–73. doi: 10.1002/tl.469.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., and J. D. Karpicke. 2006. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salemi, M. K. 2009. Clickenomics: Using a classroom response system to increase student engagement in a large-enrollment principles of economics course. Journal of Economic Education 40 (4): 385–404. doi: 10.1080/00220480903237950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeiser, K. 2017. Teaching writing in economics. Journal of Economic Education 48 (4): 254–64. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1353459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–89. [Database] doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. R. 2005. A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education 6 (2): 118–31. doi: 10.1177/1469787405054237.
   Google Scholar
• Stowe, K. 2010. A quick argument for active learning: The effectiveness of one-minute papers. Journal for Economic Educators 10 (1): 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Whittard, D. 2015. Reflections on the one-minute paper. International Review of Economics Education 20: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieman, C. E. 2014. Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (23): 8319–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407304111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieman, C., K. Perkins, S. Gilbert, F. Benay, S. Kennedy, K. Semsar, J. Knight, et al. 2017. Clicker resource guide: An instructors guide to the effective use of personal response systems (clickers) in teaching. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Science Education Initiative/Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative.
   Google Scholar