Online proctored assessment during COVID-19: Has cheating increased?

References

• Alessio, H. M., N. Malay, K. Maurer, A. Bailer, and B. Rubin. 2017. Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning 21 (1): 146–61. doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i1.885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G., D. Benjamin, and M. A. Fuss. 1994. The determinants of success in university introductory economics courses. Journal of Economic Education 25 (2): 99–119. doi: 10.2307/1183277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. J. M. 2016. Cheating at online formative tests: Does it pay off? The Internet and Higher Education 29 (April): 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. J. M., and J. T. Straten. 2012. Motivation and math skills as determinants of first-year performance in economics. Journal of Economic Education 43 (1): 33–47. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2012.636709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, C., and M. F. Johnson. 2004. Basic math skills and performance in an introductory economics class. Journal of Economic Education 35 (1): 3–23. doi: 10.3200/JECE.35.1.3-23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. 2014. Testing a model to predict online cheating—Much ado about nothing. Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (1): 65–75. doi: 10.1177/1469787413514646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkey, D., and J. Halfond. 2015. Cheating, student authentication and proctoring in online programs. Boston, MA: New England Board of Higher Education. https://nebhe.org/journal/cheating-student-authentication-and-proctoring-in-online-programs/ (accessed October 5, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Bilen, E., and A. Matros. 2021. Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 182 (February): 196–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. W., and C. E. Liedholm. 2002. Can web courses replace the classroom in principles of microeconomics? American Economic Review 92 (2): 444–49. doi: 10.1257/000282802320191778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, D., B. R. Humphreys, J. Kane, and M. A. Vachris. 2004. “No significant distance” between face-to-face and online instruction: Evidence from principles of economics. Economics of Education Review 23 (5): 533–46. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan-Gibbs, H., N. Gupta, C. Northcutt, E. Cutrell, and W. Thies. 2015. Deterring cheating in online environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22 (6): 1–28. doi: 10.1145/2810239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dendir, S., and R. Stockton Maxwell. 2020. Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 2 (August–December): 100033. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033.
   Google Scholar
• Duers, L. E., and N. Brown. 2009. An exploration of student nurses’ experiences of formative assessment. Nurse Education Today 29 (6): 654–59. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englander, F., A. Fask, and Z. Wang. 2011. Comment on “The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses” by R. W. Yates and B. Beaudrie. American Journal of Distance Education 25 (2): 114–20. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2011.565243.
   Google Scholar
• Fask, A., F. Englander, and Z. Wang. 2014. Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment. Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (2): 101–12. doi: 10.1007/s10805-014-9207-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. 2012. Online classes see cheating go high-tech. Chronicle of Higher Education 58 (38): A1–A2.
   Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J., and B. C. McEwen. 2007. Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education 21 (3): 117–32. doi: 10.1080/08923640701341653.
   Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J. W., D. Morrow, and N. E. Davis. 2011. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education 57 (4): 2333–51. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijalva, T. C., C. Nowell, and J. Kerkvliet. 2006. Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal 40 (1): 180–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hard, S. F., J. M. Conway, and A. C. Moran. 2006. Faculty and college student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. Journal of Higher Education 77 (6): 1058–80. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2006.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, O. R., and J. Lambrinos. 2008. Are online exams an invitation to cheat? Journal of Economic Education 39 (2): 116–25. doi: 10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, O. R., J. Lambrinos, and J. Buffolino. 2010. Assessment design and cheating risk in online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 13 (3). http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/Fall133/harmon_lambrinos_buffolino133.html (accessed May 24, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L., D. Harrison, D. McNally, and C. Ford. 2020. Academic integrity in an online culture: Do McCabe’s findings hold true for online, adult learners? Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (4): 419–34. doi: 10.1007/s10805-019-09335-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, O., V. A. Kuhlmeier, and M. Norris. 2021. Academic integrity in online testing: A research review. Frontiers in Education 6:Article 639814. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.639814.
   Google Scholar
• Hollister, K. K., and M. L. Berenson. 2009. Proctored versus unproctored online exams: Studying the impact of exam environment on student performance. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 7 (1): 271–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., and S. D. Levitt. 2003. Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3): 843–77. doi: 10.1162/00335530360698441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke, S., S. C. Rudert, Ä. Petersen, T. M. Fritz, and M. Daumiller. 2021. Cheating in the wake of COVID-19: How dangerous is ad hoc online testing for academic integrity? https://psyarxiv.com/6xmzh/ (accessed May 24, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., and E. Kuennen. 2006. Basic math skills and performance in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education 14 (2). http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n2/johnson.html (accessed May 24, 2022). doi: 10.1080/10691898.2006.11910581.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., D. Robson, and S. Taengnoi. 2014. A meta-analysis of the gender gap in performance in collegiate economics courses. Review of Social Economy 72 (4): 436–59. doi: 10.1080/00346764.2014.958902.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. N., S. E. Kaminsky, and T. S. Behrend. 2014. Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology 29 (4): 555–72. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K., S. Nowak, R. Raghuraman, J. Thomas, and S. F. Davis. 2000. Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal 34 (2): 309–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, J., and C. L. Sigmund. 1999. Can we control cheating in the classroom? Journal of Economic Education 30 (4): 331–43. doi: 10.2307/1182947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, A., and H. Lam. 2008. Assessing student achievement and progress with online examinations: Some pedagogical and technical issues. International Journal on E-Learning 7 (3): 383–402.
   Google Scholar
• King, C. G., R. W. Guyette, and C. Piotrowski. 2009. Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. Journal of Educators Online 6 (1). https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2009_6_1/king_guyette_piotrowski (accessed May 24, 2022). doi: 10.9743/JEO.2009.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky, R. K. 2015. Post-graduate student performance in “supervised in-class” vs. “unsupervised online” multiple choice tests: Implications for cheating and test security. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (7): 883–97. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.956683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerlöf, J., and A. Seltzer. 2009. The effects of remedial mathematics on the learning of economics: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Economic Education 40 (2): 115–37. doi: 10.3200/JECE.40.2.115-137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., L. K. Treviño, and K. D. Butterfield. 2001. Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior 11 (3): 219–32. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabb, L., and A. Olmstead. 2009. Communities of integrity in online courses: Faculty member beliefs and strategies. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 5 (2): 208–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mellar, H., R. Peytcheva-Forsyth, S. Kocdar, A. Karadeniz, and B. Yovkova. 2018. Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity 14 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x.
   Google Scholar
• Moten, J., A. Fitterer, E. Brazier, J. Leonard, and A. Brown. 2013. Examining online college cyber cheating methods and prevention measures. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 11 (2): 139–46.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. 2015. Cheating in online classes is now big business. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/11/cheating-through-online-courses/413770 (accessed May 24, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, C., and D. Laufer. 1997. Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics. Journal of Economic Education 28 (1): 3–12. doi: 10.1080/00220489709595901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, A., R. M. Conrad, and D. P. Ely. 2008. Assessing learners online. New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Paredes, S. G., F. de Jesús Jasso Peña, and J. M. de La Fuente Alcazar. 2021. Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education? Distance Education 42 (2): 200–18. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2021.1910495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passow, H. J., M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli, T. S. Harding, and D. D. Carpenter. 2006. Factors influencing engineering students’ decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education 47 (6): 643–84. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9010-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. E., I. E. Allen, and J. Seaman. 2018. Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group, Babson College. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf (accessed May 24, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J. M., M. F. Young, and T. Calabrese. 2007. Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates’ beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics & Behavior 17 (3): 233–54. doi: 10.1080/10508420701519197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuber-McEwen, D., P. Wisely, and S. Hoggatt. 2009. Point, click and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 12 (3). https://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/fall123/stuber123.html (accessed May 24, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• SURF (Samenwerkende Universiteiten RekenFaciliteiten). 2020. White paper online proctoring. Utrecht, The Netherlands: SURFnet. https://www.surf.nl/files/2020-04/surf-rapport-online-proctoring_2020_update-april-2020.pdf (accessed May 24, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez, J. J., E. P. Chiang, and I. Sarmiento-Barbieri. 2021. Can we stay one step ahead of cheaters? A field experiment in proctoring online open book exams. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 90 (February): 101653. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vician, C., D. D. Charlesworth, and P. Charlesworth. 2006. Students’ perspectives of the influence of web-enhanced coursework on incidences of cheating. Journal of Chemical Education 83 (9): 1368–75. doi: 10.1021/ed083p1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G., and J. Sottile. 2010. Cheating in the digital age: Do students cheat more in online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 13 (1). http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/spring131/watson131.html (accessed May 24, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. 1998. Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education 39 (3): 235–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1018724900565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuthisatian, R. 2020. Student exam performance in different proctored environments: Evidence from an online economics course. International Review of Economics Education 35 (November): 100196. doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2020.100196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, R. W., and B. Beaudrie. 2009. The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses. American Journal of Distance Education 23 (2): 62–70. doi: 10.1080/08923640902850601.
   Google Scholar