Gender gap in university studies of economics-business area: Evidence from Spain

References

• Alcock, J., S. Cockcroft, and F. Frank. 2008. Quantifying the advantage of secondary mathematics study for accounting and finance undergraduates. Accounting & Finance 48 (5): 697–718. doi:10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANECA (Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación). 2005. Libro Blanco: Título de Grado en Economía y en Empresa. Madrid: Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. J. M. 2020. Gender and major choice within economics: Evidence from Europe. International Review of Economics Education 35 (November): 100191. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2020.100191.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. J. M., and W. Rowaan. 2014. First-year study success in economics and econometrics: The role of gender, motivation, and math skills. Journal of Economic Education 45 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1080/00220485.2014.859957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian-Chaves, R., E. M. Buitrago, I. Masero-Moreno, and R. Yñiguez. 2021. Advanced mathematics: An advantage for business and management administration students. The International Journal of Management Education 19 (2): 100498. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian-Chaves, R., E. M. Buitrago Esquinas, I. Masero, and R. Yñiguez Ovando. 2022. Mathematical background as a success factor in economics and business degrees. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 24 (3): 758–72. doi:10.1177/1521025120946452.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J. A. 2012. The gender gap in undergraduate business programs in the United States. Journal of Education for Business 87 (5): 260–65. doi:10.1080/08832323.2011.617792.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, C., and M. F. Johnson. 2004. Basic math skills and performance in an introductory economics class. Journal of Economic Education 35 (1): 3–23. doi:10.3200/JECE.35.1.3-23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, C. 2011. Some things never change: Gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades. Sociology of Education 84 (2): 157–76. doi:10.1177/0038040711402099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, A., and C. E. Rouse. 2016. Diversity in the economics profession: A new attack on an old problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (4): 221–42. doi:10.1257/jep.30.4.221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, G., J.-W P. Laliberté, and P. Oreopoulos. 2018. Thrivers and divers: Using non-academic measures to predict college success and failure. Economics of Education Review 62 (February): 170–82. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.09.008.
   Google Scholar
• Beneito, P., J. E. Boscá, J. Ferri, and M. García. 2018. Women across subfields in economics: Relative performance and beliefs. FEDEA Working Paper No 2018-06. Madrid: Fundación de Estudios de Economía Aplicada (FEDEA). https://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2018/‌dt2018-06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boustan, L., and A. Langan. 2019. Variation in women’s success across PhD programs in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1257/jep.33.1.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. N., and A. Welki. 2006. Factors that influence choice of major: Why some students never consider economics. International Journal of Social Economics 33 (8): 547–64. doi:10.1108/03068290610678707.
   Google Scholar
• Caraballo, M. A., and E. M. Buitrago. 2019. Ethnolinguistic diversity and education. A successful pairing. Sustainability 11 (23): 6625. doi:10.3390/su11236625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Manzano, J. I., M. Castro-Nuño, M. T. Sanz, and R. Yñiguez. 2016. Does pressing a button make it easier to pass an exam? Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive technologies in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (4): 710–20. doi:10.1111/bjet.12258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyrenne, P., and A. Chan. 2012. High school grades and university performance: A case study. Economics of Education Review 31 (5): 524–42. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolado, J. J., and E. Morales. 2009. Which factors determine academic performance of economics freshers? Some Spanish evidence. Investigaciones Económicas 33 (2): 179–210.
   Google Scholar
• Dynan, K., and C. Rouse. 1997. The underrepresentation of women in economics: A study of undergraduate economics students. Journal of Economic Education 28 (4): 350–68. doi:10.2307/1183419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, T., K. McGoldrick, and K. J. Mumford. 2012. Women and the choice to study economics. Journal of Economic Education 43 (4): 349–62. doi:10.1080/00220485.2012.714306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, T., K. McGoldrick, and J. J. Siegfried. 2018. The gender gap in economics degrees: An investigation of the role model and quantitative requirements hypotheses. Southern Economic Journal 84 (3): 898–911. doi:10.1002/soej.12247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice (European Education and Culture Executive Agency [EACEA]). 2012. Higher education in Europe 2009: Developments in the Bologna process. Luxembourg: European Union Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hadsell, L. 2010. Achievement goals, locus of control, and academic success in economics. American Economic Review 100 (2): 272–76. doi:10.1257/aer.100.2.272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black. 1999. Análsis multivariante. 5th ed. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. E. 2000. Modelos multivariados aplicados al análisis de datos [Multivariate models applied to data analysis]. Mexico City: International Thomson Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., and E. Kuennen. 2006. Basic math skills and performance in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education 14 (2). doi:10.1080/10691898.2006.11910581.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., D. Robson, and S. Taengnoi. 2014. A meta-analysis of the gender gap in performance in collegiate economics courses. Review of Social Economy 72 (4): 436–459. doi:10.1080/00346764.2014.958902.
   Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and G. Bassett. 1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46 (1): 33. doi:10.2307/1913643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and K. Hallock. 2001. Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4): 143–56. doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. M., J. S. Hyde, J. L. Petersen, and M. C. Linn. 2010. New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136 (6): 1123–35. doi:10.1037/a0021276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallik, G., and J. Lodewijks. 2010. Student performance in a large first year economics subject: Which variables are significant? Economic Papers 29 (1): 80–86. doi:10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00051.x.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, E. C., and A. Underwood. 2022. Is economics STEM? Process of (re)classification, requirements, and quantitative rigor. Journal of Economic Education 53 (3): 250–58. doi:10.1080/00220485.2022.2075508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 2014. Real Decreto 412/2014, de 6 de junio, por el que se establece la normativa básica de los procedimientos de admisión a las enseñanzas universitarias oficiales de Grado [Royal Decree 412/2014 of 6 June establishing the basic regulations for admission to official undergraduate university education]. Boletín Oficial del Estado n° 138.7/6/2014. Madrid: State Agency Official State Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Universidades. 2022. Datos y cifras del Sistema universitario español [Data and figures of the Spanish University System]. Publicación 2021-2022. Madrid: Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Secretaría General de Universidades España.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi, A., and F. Naqvi. 2016. A study on learning styles, gender and academic performance of post graduate management students in India. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences 06 (01): 1–6. doi:10.4172/2162-6359.1000398.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, N. S. 2017. Degrees of difference: Women, men, and the value of higher education. New York: Taylor & Francis. doi:10.4324/9781315521817.
   Google Scholar
• Opstad, L. 2019. Different attitudes towards mathematics among economic and business students and choice of business course major in Norway. Social Sciences and Education Research Review 6 (2): 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2020. Attitudes towards statistics among business students: Do gender, mathematical skills and personal traits matter? Sustainability 12 (15): 6104. doi:10.3390/su12156104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opstad, L., and T. Årethun. 2020. Factors that explain undergraduate business students’ performance in their chosen field. Does gender matter? Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings 15 (2): 2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, J. M., J. Aldás-Manzano, F. J. Goerlich, P. J. Pérez, L. Serrano, A. Catalán, Á. Soler, I. Zaera, and S. Mollá. 2019. La contribución socioeconómica del sistema universitario español [The socio-economic contribution of the Spanish University System]. Madrid: Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas (CRUE), Conferencia de Consejos Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, C. 2004. Técnicas de análisis multivariante de datos. aplicaciones con SPSS [Analysis techniques of multivariate data applications with SPSS]. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M. 2020. Brechas y sesgos de género en la elección de estudios STEM ¿Por qué ocurren y cómo actuar para eliminarlas? [Gender gaps and biases in the choice of STEM studies. Why do they occur and how to act to eliminate them?]. Sevilla: Fundación Pública Andaluza Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M. V., and E. Vallelado. 2013. Algunas dimensiones relacionadas con el rendimiento académico de estudiantes de administración y dirección de empresas [Some dimensions related to the academic performance of business administration and management students]. Universitas Psychologica 12 (3): 739–52. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-3.adrr.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2020. A new generation: 25 years of efforts for gender equality in education. Global education monitoring report 2020. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO-IESALC. 2021. Women in higher education: Has the female advantage put an end to gender inequalities? Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Universidad de Sevilla. 2010. Resolución de 20 de diciembre de 2010, de la Universidad de Sevilla, por la que se publica el plan de estudios de graduado en administración y dirección de empresas [Resolution of December 20, 2010, of the University of Seville, by which the study plan for graduate in business administration and management is published]. Boletín Oficial Del Estado n° 17.20/01/2011. https://alojawebapps.us.es/fichape/Doc/MVBOE/151_‌memVerBOE.pdf (accessed February 9, 2024).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2019a. Resolución de 22 de julio de 2019, de la Universidad de Sevilla, por la que se publica la modificación del plan de estudios de graduado en economía [Resolution of July 22, 2019, of the University of Seville, by which the modification of the graduate in economics study plan is published]. Boletín Oficial Del Estado n° 193.13/08/2019. https://alojawebapps.us.es/fichape/Doc/MVBOE/156_memVerBOE.pdf (accessed February 9, 2024).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2019b. Resolución de 22 de julio de 2019, de la Universidad de Sevilla, por la que se publica la modificación del plan de estudios de graduado en marketing e investigación de mercados [Resolution of July 22, 2019, of the University of Seville, by which the modification of the graduate in marketing and market research study plan is published]. Boletín Oficial Del Estado n° 193.13/08/2019. https://alojawebapps.us.es/fichape/Doc/MVBOE/180_memVerBOE.pdf (accessed February 9, 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., and J. L. Degol. 2017. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review 29 (1): 119–40. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T. M., and G. C. Wolniak. 2021. Unpacking the “female advantage” in the career and economic impacts of college. In The Wiley handbook of gender equity in higher education, ed. N. S. Niemi and M. B. Weaver-Hightower, 7–28. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A., and H. Higgs. 2004. Factors explaining the choice of an economics major: The role of student characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession. International Journal of Social Economics 31 (5/6): 593–613. doi:10.1108/03068290410529416.
   Google Scholar