Theoretical notes on a relational approach to principals’ time use

References

• Adkins, L. 2009. “Sociological Futures: From Clock Time to Event Time.” Sociological Research Online 14 (4): 1–5. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/14/14/18.html. doi: 10.5153/sro.1976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, L. 2011. “Practice as Temporalisation: Bourdieu and Economic Crisis.” In The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 347–365. London: Athem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, L. 2014. “Luc Boltanski and the Problem of Time: Notes Towards a Pragmatic Sociology of the Future.” In Essays on the Pragmatic Sociology of Critique, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 517–538. New York, NY: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ås, D. 1978. “Studies of Time-Use: Problems and Prospects.” Acta Sociologica 21 (2): 125–141. doi: 10.1177/000169937802100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. A., E. Camburn, B. R. Sanders, and J. Sebastian. 2010. “Developing Instructional Leaders: Using Mixed Methods to Explore the Black Box of Planned Change in Principals’ Professional Practice.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (2): 241–279. doi: 10.1177/1094670510361748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R. J. 1983. Educational Administration and the Management of Knowledge. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. 1965. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” Economic Journal 75: 493–517. doi: 10.2307/2228949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Translated by C. Turner. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., J.-C. Chamboredon, and J.-C. Passeron. 1991[1968]. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Translated by R. Nice. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. E. 1962. Education and the Cult of Efficiency. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., J. P. Spillane, and J. Sebastian. 2010. “Assessing the Utility of a Daily Log for Measuring Principal Leadership Practice.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (5): 707–737. doi: 10.1177/0013161X10377345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonaro, W. 2005. “Tracking, Students’ Effort, and Academic Achievement.” Sociology of Education 78: 27–49. doi:10.1177/003804070507800102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, H., L. Henriksson, B. Niemeyer, and T. Seddon. 2012. “Competing Time Orders in Human Service Work: Towards a Politics of Time.” Time & Society 21 (3): 371–394. doi: 10.1177/0961463X11434014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbertson, J. A. 1988. “A Century’s Quest for a Knowledge Base.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, edited by N. J. Boyan, 3–26. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. F., and E. J. Haller. 1981. “Exposure to Instruction, Surplus Time, and Student Achievement: A Local Replication of the Harnischfeger and Wiley Research.” Educational Administration Quarterly 17 (1): 48–68. doi: 10.1177/0013161X8101700104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 1997. The Right to Learn: A Blueprint for Creating Schools that Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dèpelteau, F. 2015. “Relational Sociology, Pragmatism, Transactions and Social Fields.” International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie 25 (1): 45–64. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2014.997966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A. 2007. Global modernity: Modernity in the age of global capitalism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. 2015. “Manifesto for a Critical Realist Relational Sociology.” International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie 25 (1): 86–109. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2014.997967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmoyer, R., and F. Galloway. 2010. “Reconsidering the Utility of Case Study Designs for Researching School Reform in a Neo-Scientific Era: Insights from a Multi-Year, Mixed-Methods Study.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (1): 3–30. doi: 10.1177/1094670509353041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncheon, J. C., and W. G. Tierney. 2013. “Changing Conceptions of Time: Implications for Educational Research.” Review of Educational Research 83 (2): 236–272. doi: 10.3102/0034654313478492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2013. “‘Leadership’ and the Social: Time, Space and the Epistemic.” International Journal of Educational Management 27 (1): 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2015. Educational Leadership Relationally: A Theory and Methodology for Educational Leadership, Management and Administration. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2018. Beyond Leadership: A Relational Approach to Organizational Theory in Education. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S., and C. W. Evers. 2015. “New Frontiers in Educational Leadership, Management and Administration.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (4): 307–311. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2014.977530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, P., and D. Weindling. 2007. “Do School Leaders Have a Shelf Life? Career Stages and Headteacher Performance.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 35 (1): 73–88. doi: 10.1177/1741143207071386
   Google Scholar
• Endrissat, N., and W. von Arx. 2013. “Leadership Practices and Context: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” Leadership 9 (2): 278–304. doi: 10.1177/1742715012468786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahy, K. M., M. Easterby-Smith, and J. E. Lervik. 2014. “The Power of Spatial and Temporal Orderings in Organizational Learning.” Management Learning 45 (2): 123–144. doi: 10.1177/1350507612471925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W., and E. G. Guba. 1957. “Social Behavior and the Administrative Process.” The School Review 65 (4): 423–441. doi: 10.1086/442411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, D. E. 1959. Administrative Theory. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., S. Loeb, and B. Master. 2013. “Effective Instructional Time Use for School Leaders: Longitudinal Evidence from Observations of Principals.” Educational Researcher 42 (8): 433–444. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13510020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., S. Loeb, and H. Mitani. 2015. “Principal Time Management Skills: Explaining Patterns in Principals’ Time Use, Job Stress, and Perceived Effectiveness.” Journal of Educational Administration 53 (6): 773–793. doi: 10.1108/JEA-09-2014-0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. C. 1982. “Neo-Taylorism in Educational Administration?” Educational Administration Quarterly 18 (4): 17–35. doi: 10.1177/0013161X82018004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, D. M., L. Drysdale, and B. Mulford. 2006. “Models of Successful School Principal Leadership.” School Leadership & Management 26 (4): 371–395. doi: 10.1080/13632430600886921
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 1990. “Teachers’ Work and the Politics of Time and Space.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 3 (4): 303–320. doi: 10.1080/0951839900030401
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. S. 1993. “Guidelines for Time Use Data Collection.” Social Indicators Research 30 (2): 197–228. doi: 10.1007/BF01078728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, R. J. 1982. “Functional Requirements and the Theory of Action.” Educational Administration Quarterly 18 (4): 36–61. doi: 10.1177/0013161X82018004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochbein, C., B. V. Dever, G. White, L. Mayger, and E. Gallagher. 2017. “Confronting Methodological Challenges in Studying School Leader Time Use Through Technological Advancements.” Educational management Administration & Leadership 46 (4): 659–678. doi:10.1177/1741143217700281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, E. L., D. Klasik, and S. Loeb. 2010. “Principal’s Time Use and School Effectiveness.” American Journal of Education 116 (4): 491–523. doi: 10.1086/653625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W., and C. Miskel. 1978. Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kanigel, R. 1997. The One Best Way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and P. Hallinger. 2012. “National Contexts Influencing Principals’ Time Use and Allocation: Economic Development, Societal Culture, and Educational System.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (4): 461–482. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.678862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and D. Duke. 1999. “A Century’s Quest to Understand School Leadership.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, 2nd ed., edited by J. Murphy, and K. S. Louis, 45–72. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., and G. Thompson. 2017. “Doing Time in the Sociology of Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1260854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manasse, A. L. 1985. “Improving Conditions for Principal Effectiveness: Policy Implications of Research.” The Elementary School Journal 85 (3): 439–463. doi: 10.1086/461413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, W. J., and D. J. Willower. 1981. “The Managerial Behaviour of High School Principals.” Educational Administration Quarterly 17 (1): 69–90. doi: 10.1177/0013161X8101700105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., C. M. Neumerski, E. B. Goldring, J. Grissom, and A. C. Porter. 2015. “Bottling Fog? The Quest for Instructional Management.” Cambridge Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/03057664X.2015.1064096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. 2016. “Educational Administration and the Relational Approach: Can We Suffice Contextual-Based Knowledge Production?” Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations 25 (2): 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1968[1937]. The Structure of Social Action. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman, K., M. Irby, J. Tolman, N. Yohalem, and T. Ferber. 2003. Preventing Problems, Promoting Development, Encouraging Engagement: Competing Priorities or Inseparable Goals? http://dev.forumfyi.org/files/Preventing%20Problems,%20Promoting%20Development,%20Encouraging%20Engagement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J., V. R. Wight, B. R. Hunt, and S. M. Bianchi. 2009. “The Time Use of Teenagers.” Social Science Research 38: 792–809. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, J., E. M. Camburn, and J. P. Spillane. 2017. “Portraits of Principal Practice: Time Allocation and School Principal Work.” Educational Administration Quarterly 54 (1): 47–84. doi:10.1177/0013161x17720978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1945. Administrative Behavior. New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., E. M. Camburn, and J. Pustejovsky. 2008. “Taking a Distributed Perspective: Epistemological and Methodological Tradeoffs in Operationalizing the Leader-Plus Aspect.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (2): 189–213. doi: 10.1108/09578230810863262
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., and A. Zuberi. 2009. “Designing and Piloting a Leadership Daily Practice Log: Using Logs to Study the Practice of Leadership.” Educational Administration Quarterly 45 (3): 375–423. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08329290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalai, A., K. Kim, I. Oh, K. Choo, D. Kang, H. Park, and S. Yang, eds. 1972. The use of time. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, F. W. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. R., Q. Willis, and D. Phillipps. 1981. “Observational Studies of Australian School Administrators: Methodological Issues.” Australian Journal of Education 25 (1): 55–72. doi: 10.1177/000494418102500106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., and I. Cook. 2017. “The Politics of Teaching Time in Disciplinary and Control Societies.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (1): 26–37. doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1234365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, T. 2007. “The Homework-Achievement Relation Reconsidered: Differentiating Homework Time, Homework Frequency, and Homework Effort.” Learning and Instruction 17: 372–388. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkow, M. R. 2009. “Academic Achievement and Adolescents’ Daily Time Use in the Social and Academic Domains.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 19: 151–172. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00587.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar