Social epistemology and the theory turn: a response to Niesche

References

• Bates, R. J. 1980. “Educational Administration, the Sociology of Science, and the Management of Knowledge.” Educational Administration Quarterly 16 (2): 1–20. doi: 10.1177/0013161X8001600204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R. J. 2011. “And What Rough Beast, its Hour Come Round at Last, Struggles … to be Born?” In Education, Social Justice and the Legacy of Deakin University: Reflections of the Deakin Diaspora, edited by R. Tinning, and K. Sirna, 1–13. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R. J., and S. Eacott. 2008. “Teaching Educational Leadership and Administration in Australia.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 40 (2): 149–160. doi: 10.1080/00220620802210913
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. 1999. Troubling Women: Feminism, Leadership and Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donmoyer, R. 2001. “Evers and Lakomski’s Search for Leadership’s Holy Grail (and the Intriguing Ideas They Encountered Along the way).” Journal of Educational Administration 39 (6): 554–572. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006053.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2013. “Rethinking ‘Leadership’ in Education: A Research Agenda.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 45 (2): 113–125. doi: 10.1080/00220620.2013.768971
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2016. “Fluctuations in Value: The Shifting Worth of Journal Articles in Educational Administration.” Critical Studies in Education, doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1186708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2017. “A Social Epistemology for Educational Administration and Leadership.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 49 (3): 196–214. doi:10.1080/00220620.2017.1315380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. 2018. Beyond Leadership: A Relational Approach to Organizational Theory in Education. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C. W., and G. Lakomski. 1991. Knowing Educational Administration: Contemporary Methodological Controversies in Educational Research. London: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, T. B. 1974. Theory in the Study of Organizations and Administrative Structures: A New Perspective. Paper presented at the Third International Intervisitation Program on Educational Administration, Bristol, England.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, T. B., and P. Ribbins. 1993. Greenfield on Educational Administration: Towards a Humane Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. 2008. “The State of Denmark.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 40 (2): 173–185. doi: 10.1080/00220620802210889
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K., and C. Symes. 2017. “Making Moves: Theorizations of Education and Mobility.” Critical Studies in Education 58 (2): 125–130. doi:10.1080/17508487.2017.1317756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M. 2016. An Intellectual History of School Leadership Practice and Research. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxcy, S. J. 1993. Postmodern School Leadership: Meeting the Crisis in Educational Administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Niesche, R. 2017. “Critical Perspectives in Educational Leadership: A New ‘Theory Turn?’” Journal of Educational Administration and History, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00220620.2017.1395600.
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. 2009. “The Field of Educational Administration.” Journal of Educational Administration 47 (1): 8–35. doi: 10.1108/09578230910928061
   Google Scholar
• Prandini, R. 2015. “Relational Sociology: a Well-Defined Sociological Paradigm or a Challenging ‘Relational Turn’ in Sociology?” International Review of Sociology 25 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/03906701.2014.997969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. 1993. A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. 2008. “Australia’s Great Disengagement with Public Education and Social Justice in Educational Leadership.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 40 (3): 221–233. doi:10.1080/00220620802507219.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. 2011. “Foreword.” In Education, Social Justice and the Legacy of Deakin University: Reflections of the Deakin Diaspora, edited by R. Tinning, and K. Sirna, ix–xiv. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., and R. Willmott. 2003. Educational Management in managerialist Times: Beyond the Textual Apologists. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinning, R., and K. Sirna2011. Education, Social Justice and the Legacy of Deakin University: Reflections of the Deakin Diaspora. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D. 1998. “Editorial: On the Occasion of the Inaugural Issue of the International Journal of Leadership in Education.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 1 (1): 91–93. doi: 10.1080/1360312980010110
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D. 2002. “The Paradigm Wars in Educational Administration: An Attempt at Transcendence.” International Studies in Educational Administration 30 (1): 66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2018. “The Panorama of the Last Decade’s Theoretical Groundings of Educational Leadership Research: A Concept Co-Occurrence Network Analysis.” Educational Administration Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0013161X18761342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., and S. Eacott. 2013. “‘Outsiders Within’? Deconstructing the Educational Administration Scholar.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 16 (2): 191–204. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2012.750762
   Google Scholar