2,101
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Organisational arrangements, resources and tensions in the enactment of a renewed state curriculum: the entrepreneurial role of principals and superintendents

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 202-219 | Received 21 Apr 2022, Accepted 27 Jan 2023, Published online: 06 Feb 2023

References

  • Aasen, P., J. Møller, E. Rye, E. Ottesen, T. S. Prøitz, and F. Hertzberg. 2012. Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform-et løft eller et løfte? Forvaltningsnivåenes og institusjonenes rolle i implementeringen av reformen. [The Knowledge Promotion as a governing reform-improvement or a promise? Levels of public administration and the role of institutions in the implementation of the reform]. Report no. 20. Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education and Department of Teacher Education and School Research.
  • Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Beckert, J. 1999. “Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organisations.” Organisation Studies 20 (5): 777–799. doi:10.1177/0170840699205004
  • Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2015. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brunsson, N., and J. P. Olsen. 1998. “Organisation Theory: Thirty Years of Dismantling, and Then … ?” In Organizing Organisations, edited by N. Brunsson, and J. P. Olsen, 13–43. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and K. A. and Røvik. 2020. Organisation Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Clarke, J. 2014. “Inspections: Governing at a Distance.” In Governing by Inspection, edited by S. Grek, and J. Lindgren, 11–26. Oxon: Routledge.
  • DiMaggio, P. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organisations: Culture and Environment, edited by L. G. Zucker, 3–21. Pensacoloa, FLA: Ballinger.
  • Dorado, S. 2005. “Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening.” Organisation Studies 26 (3): 385–414. doi:10.1177/0170840605050873
  • Engeström, Y. 1999. “Innovative Learning in Work Teams: Analysing Cycles of Knowledge Creation in Work Teams.” In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamäki, 377–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2017. “Studies of Expansive Learning: Foundations, Findings and Future Challenges.” Introduction to Vygotsky, 100–146. doi:10.4324/9781315647654-5
  • EVA2020. (n.d.). The Evaluation of the New National Curriculum: Intentions, Processes, and Practices (EVA2020). Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo. https://www.uv.uio.no/english/research/projects/EVA2020/index.html
  • Garud, R., C. Hardy, and S. Maguire. 2007. “Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Organisation Studies 28 (7): 957–969. doi:10.1177/0170840607078958
  • Government Act. 1998. Act Relating to Primary and Secondary Education and Training (the Education Act). LOV-1998-07-17-61. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1998-07-17-61.
  • Greenwood, R., and R. Suddaby. 2006. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 27–48. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785498
  • Hall, J. B. 2017. “Examining School Inspectors and Education Directors within the Organisation of School Inspection Policy: Perceptions and Views.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61 (1): 112–126. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1120234
  • Hardy, C., S. Maguire. 2008. “Institutional Entrepreneurship.” In The Sage Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, et al., 198–217. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hardy, C., S. Maguire. 2017. “Institutional Entrepreneurship and Change in Fields.” In The Sage Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism (2nd ed.), edited by R. Greenwood, et al., 261–280. THousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Henriksen, ØH, and J. M. Paulsen. 2021. “Balancing Trust and Control Through Dialogue Meetings in Norwegian School District Governance.” Educational Research for Policy and Practice 20: 349–365. doi:10.1007/s10671-020-09287-1
  • Karseth, B., O. A. Kvamme, and E. Ottesen. 2020. Fagfornyelsens læreplanverk: Politiske intensjoner, arbeidsprosesser og innhold. [The Curriculum Renewal: Political Intentions, Work Processes and Content]. Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo. Oslo.
  • Leca, B., J. Battilana, and E. Boxenbaum. 2008. Agency and Institutions: A Review of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
  • Levy, D., and M. Scully. 2007. “The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields.” Organisation Studies 28 (7): 971–991. doi:10.1177/0170840607078109
  • Lundgren, U. P. 2002. “Political Governing of the Education Sector: Reflections on Change.” Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2002 (1): 1–13.
  • Maguire, S. 2007. “Institutional Entrepreneurship.” In International Encyclopedia of Organisation Studies, edited by S. Clegg, and J. R. Bailey, 674–678. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maguire, S., C. Hardy, and T. B. Lawrence. 2004. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: Hiv/Aids Treatment Advocacy in Canada.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (5): 657–679. doi:10.2307/20159610
  • Molander, A. 2016. Discretion in the Welfare State: Social Rights and Professional Judgment. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Møller, J. 2021. “Images of Norwegian Educational Leadership – Historical and Current Distinctions.” In The Cultural and Social Foundations of Educational Leadership, edited by R. Normand, et al., 67–82. Cham: Springer.
  • Ottesen, E., T. Colbjørnsen, A. E. Gunnulfsen, J. B. Hall, and R. Jensen. 2021. Fagfornyelsens forberedelser i praksis: Strategier, begrunnelser, spenninger [The Curriculum Renewal in Practice: Strategies, Explanations, Tensions]. Report no. 2. The Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo. Oslo.
  • Pacheco, D. F., J. G. York, T. J. Dean, and S. D. Sarasvathy. 2010. “"The Coevolution of Institutional Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Theories.”.” Journal of Management 36 (4): 974–1010. doi:10.1177/0149206309360280
  • Palmer, D., R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. E. Meyer. 2017. “Institutions, Institutional Theory, and Organisational Wrongdoing.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism, 737–758.
  • Scott, W. R. 2013. Institutions and Organisations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shally, C., M. A. Hitt, and J. Zhou. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Thompson, N. A., K. Verduijn, and W. B. Gartner. 2020. “Entrepreneurship-As-Practice: Grounding Contemporary Theories of Practice Into Entrepreneurship Studies.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 32 (3–4): 247–256. doi:10.1080/08985626.2019.1641978
  • Tiberius, V., M. Rietz, and R. B. Bouncken. 2020. “Performance Analysis and Science Mapping of Institutional Entrepreneurship Research.” Administrative Sciences 10 (3): 69. doi:10.3390/admsci10030069
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. 2014. Trust Matters: Leadership for Successful Schools. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • UDIR (2020). Directorate for Education and Training. . Core Curriculum – Values and Principles for Primary and Secondary Education. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/?lang = eng.
  • Uljens, M., and R. M. Ylimaki. 2017. Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik: Non-Affirmative Theory of Education. Cham: Springer.
  • Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Williams, C. C., and A. Gurtoo, eds. 2017. Routledge Handbook of Entrepreneurship in Developing Economies. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.