A Multivariate Model of Achievement in Geometry

REFERENCES

• Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the competitive context: An examination of person–situation interactions. Journal of Personality, 77, 1615–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba, A. (1998). Shape makers with the geometer's sketchpad, GR. 5–8. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4, 135–137.
   Google Scholar
• Awan, R., Noureen, G., & Naz, A. (2011). A study of relationship between achievement motivation, self concept and achievement in English and mathematics at secondary level. International Educational Studies, 4(3), 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Baki, A., Kosa, T., & Guven, B. (2011), A comparative study of the effects of using dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on the spatial visualisation skills of pre-service mathematics teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Locke, E.A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., & Jensen, E.B. (Eds.). (1999). Geometry in present day science: Proceedings of the conference. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M.T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista, M.T. (2002). Shape Makers: A computer environment that engenders students’ construction of geometric ideas and reasoning. Computers in Schools, 17, 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, L. (2001). Transforming novice problem solvers into experts. Teach Talk, 13(3).
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S., & Moore, T. (2009). Learning in context. Principal Leadership, 9(8), 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J.C., & Johnson, R.E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, A.S. (1998). Individual differences within problem-solving strategies used in physics. Science Education, 82, 379–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duatepe-Paksu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2009). Effects of drama-based geometry instruction on student achievement, attitudes, and thinking levels. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 272–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A.C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics-a “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions toward mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 497–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofalo, J., & Bell, R.L. (2004). A new look at geometer's sketchpad: Teaching area across grade levels. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 233–235.
   Google Scholar
• Gittler, G., & Gluck, J. (1998). Differential transfer of learning: Effects of instruction in descriptive geometry on spatial test performance. Journal of Geometry and Graphics, 2, 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S.M., Aultman, L.P., & Owens, A.M. (2005). Motivation to learn in general education programs. The Journal of General Education, 54, 150–170.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S.M., & Koballa, T.R. Jr. (2006). Motivation to learn college science. In J.J. Mintzes & W.H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S.M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1088–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U. S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-001 Revised). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Guven, B., Baki, A., & Cekmez, E. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software to develop problem solving skills. Mathematics and Computer Education, 46, 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Halawah, I. (2006). The effect of motivation, family environment, and student characteristics on academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 91–99. . Retrieved from Professional Development Collection database.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M.S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, N. (2008). The sourcebook for teaching science: Strategies, activities and instructional resources (Grades 6–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heyworth, R.M. (1999), Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R.H., & Panter, A.T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional fit criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide. A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2002). LISREL 8.52. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, T.Z. (1993). Causal influences on school learning. In H.J. Walberg (Ed.), Analytic methods for educational productivity (pp. 21–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khadaroo, S.T. (2011). Can the US compete if only 32 percent of its students are proficient in math? . Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2011/0817/Can-the-US-compete-if-only-32-percent-of-its-students-are-proficient-in-math
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R.E., Boswell, L., & Stiff, L. (2004). Geometry. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, M.J., & Chinnappan, M. (2000). Knowledge connectedness in geometry problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 26–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, A., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougal Littell. (2007). Georgia high school: Mathematics 2. Evanston, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, C.C., & Sam, L.C. (2011). Encouraging the innovative use of geometer's sketchpad through lesson study. Creative Education, 2, 236–243.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J.A., & Spanias, P.A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzales, E., Gregory, K, Garden, R., O’Connor, K., … Smith, T. (2000) TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report. Boston, MA: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Center for Career and Technical Education. (2011). Geometry in construction. Louisville, KY: NRCCTE.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). A profile of student performance in mathematics and science. In PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1, pp. 121–156). Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264091450-6-en
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performance: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Elliot, A.J., & Maier, M.A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L.M., Stupnisky, R.H., & Perry, R.P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R.P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Molfenter, S., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2000, April). Emotion, learning, and achievement in university students: Longitudinal studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E.J. (2009). Goals, emotions, and emotion regulation: Perspectives of the control-value theory. Human Development, 52, 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. . (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED338112).
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D.H. (2011). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, I. (2009). Using tool-making to contextualise geometry: The super-size protractor. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 65(2), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sherard, W. (1981). Why is geometry a basic skill? Mathematics Teacher, 74, 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N. (2006). Mathematics and beauty: Aesthetic approaches to teaching children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, T., Olivarez, A.Jr., Lan, W.Y., & Tallent-Runnels, M.K. (2004). Role of mathematics self-efficacy and motivation performance across ethnicity. The Journal of Educational Research, 97, 208–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianou, D.A., & Silver, E.A. (2004). The role of visual representations in advanced mathematical problem solving: An examination of expert–novice similarities and differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 353–387.
   Google Scholar
• Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on student's academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3, 149–156.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Schiefele, U., & Roeser, R. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 406–434). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J.M., & Xin, M. (2002). Predicting student growth in mathematical content knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 288–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C., & Pintrich, P. (2001). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 103–124). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Is visual example in geometry always helpful? Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 265–272.
   Google Scholar