The Effects of Note-Taking Skills Instruction on Elementary Students’ Reading

REFERENCES

• Anderson, V., & Hidi, S. (1988). Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46, 26–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L., Lee, M., & Carr, J. P. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students’ recording of lecture content. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 314–320.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Pasting and encoding: Note-taking in online courses. In Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 789–793). Kerkrade, The Netherlands: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R. (2010). Strategic note-taking for middle-school students with learning disabilities in science classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R., & Weishaar, M. (2001). The effects of strategic notetaking on the recall and comprehension of lecture information for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5, 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research (pp. 87–131). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M., & Hult, R. E. (1997). Effects of writing summaries as a generative learning activity during note taking. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 47–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (Vol. 3, pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., & Thomas, C. C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students’ comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21, 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mila, M., & Andersen, C. (2007). Developmental change in notetaking during scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1035–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, I., Xu, Z., & Hardaker, G. (2007). Online annotation – Research and practices. Computers & Education, 49, 1308–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low-and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, C., Wehling, U., & Rothkugel, S. (2009). From paper-and-pen annotations to artefact-based mobile learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Providing the instructor's notes: An effective addition to student notetaking. Educational Psychologist, 20, 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A. (1987). Notetaking and review: The research and its implications. Instructional Science, 16, 233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S. I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension theory as a guide for the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M., Joseph, L. M., & Eveleigh, E. (2009). A meta-analytic review of guided notes. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 421–444.
   Google Scholar
• Koran, M. L., & Koran, J. J. (1980). Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 477–483.
   Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, E. N., Skok, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1993). The effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77, 75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2007). Generative learning: Principles and implications for making meaning. In D. D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 111–124). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. L., Lan, W., Hamman, D., & Hendricks, B. (2008). The effects of teaching notetaking strategies on elementary students’ science learning. Instructional Science, 36, 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levie, W., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30, 195–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, B. G., & Chi, P. H. (2002). The Test of Reading Comprehension. Taipei, Taiwan: Special Education Unit, Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Linden, M., & Wittrock, M. C. (1981). The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 44–57.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Using illustrations to promote constructivist learning from science text. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., & Ray, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 127–152.
   Google Scholar
• Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 514–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani, M., & Sadeghi, K. (2011). Effects of note-taking training on reading comprehension and recall. The Reading Matrix, 11, 116–128.
   Google Scholar
• Rummel, N., Levin, J. R., & Woodward, M. M. (2003). Do pictorial mnemonic text-learning aids give students something worth writing about? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelstuen, M. S., & Braten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa, C. M., Abrams, L., & Santa, J. L. (1979). Effects of notetaking and studying on the retention of prose. Journal of Literacy Research, 11, 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrager, L., & Mayer, R. E. (1989). Note-taking fosters generative learning strategies in novices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 263–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cues and student notetaking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 447–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar