925
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Influence of Applied STEM Coursetaking on Advanced Mathematics and Science Coursetaking

REFERENCES

  • Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 3–27.
  • Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1964782.
  • Bradby, D., & Hudson, L. (2007). The 2007 revision of the career/technical education portion of the secondary school taxonomy (NCES 2008-030). Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Effects of high school course-work and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 866–875.
  • Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (2003). Mathematics, foreign language, and science coursetaking and the NELS:88 transcript data (Working Paper, NCES 2003-01). Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Routledge.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do gender and race matter? Explaining the relationship between sports participation and achievement. Sociological Spectrum, 25, 177–195.
  • Farrell, M. (2013, June 11). Tech firms call for mandatory computer classes. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2013/06/10/techleaders-push-for-computer-standards-mass-public-schools/jRy6dMDVV7ylPw6Ns9sdFL/story.html
  • Federman, M. (2007). State graduation requirements, high school course taking, and choosing a technical college major. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7, 4.
  • Gottfried, M. A., Bozick, R., & Srinivasan, S. V. (2014). Beyond academic math: The role of applied STEM coursetaking in high school. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1–35.
  • Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students' engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1325–1343.
  • Hutchison, L. V. (2012). Addressing the STEM teacher shortage in American schools: Ways to recruit and retain effective STEM teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 34, 541–550.
  • Lee, V. E., & Frank, K. A. (1990). Students' characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two-year to four-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 63, 178–193.
  • Long, M. C., Conger, D., & Iatarola, P. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and post-secondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 285–322.
  • McClure, G. T. (1998). High school mathematics course taking and achievement among college-bound students: 1987–1996. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 110–118.
  • Melguizo, T., & Wolniak, G. C. (2012). The earnings benefits of majoring in STEM fields among high achieving minority students. Research in Higher Education, 53, 383–405.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Digest of education statistics, 2001 (NCES 2002-130). Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The condition of education, 2003 (NCES 2003-067). Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2006). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base-year through third follow-up, with high school transcript data files. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: Routledge.
  • Olitsky, N. H. (2014). How do academic achievement and gender affect the earnings of STEM majors? A propensity score matching approach. Research in Higher Education, 55, 245–271. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-93110-y
  • Pearson, J., Crissey, S. R., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2009). Gendered fields: Sports and advanced course-taking in high school. Sex Roles, 61, 519–35.
  • Riegle-Crumb, C. (2006) The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113, 101–122.
  • Sax, L. J. (1994). Predicting gender and major-field differences in mathematical self-concept during college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 291–307.
  • Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 153–172.
  • Schneider, B., Swanson, C., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25–53.
  • Schultz, P. W., Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., Chance, R. C., Aguilar, M., & Serpe, R. T. (2011). Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 95–114.
  • STEM Education Innovation Act of 2011, H.R. 3373, 112th Cong. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h3373/text
  • Stone, J. R. III, Alfeld, C., Pearson, D., Lewis, M. V., & Jensen, S. (2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 767–795.
  • Stone, J. R. III, & Lewis, M. V. (2012). College and career ready in the 21st century: Making high school matter. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Trusty, J. (2002). Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics majors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 464–474.
  • Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 243–270.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and math: Education for global leadership. Washington, DC: Routledge.
  • Weinberger, C. J. (2004). Just ask! Why surveyed women did not pursue IT courses or careers. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23, 28–35.
  • Wilson, C., Sudol, L. A., Stephenson, C., & Stehlik, M. (2010). Running on empty: The failure to teach K–12 computer science in the digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wilson, F. (2003). Can compute, won't compute: Women's participation in the culture of computing. New Technology, Work, and Employment, 18, 127–142.
  • Wimberly, G. L., & Noeth, R. J. (2005). College readiness begins in middle school. Iowa City, IA: Routledge.
  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.