Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education

References

• Abbeduto, L. (2010). Taking sides: Clashing views in educational psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Texas Educational Review, 1(2), 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. (2005). Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. University of Connecticut. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499083.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Beilock, S., & Carr, T. (2005). When high-powered people fail working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 253–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., & Summers, J. (2012). Factor validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in Asynchronous Online Learning Environments (AOLE). Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Crede, M., & Phillips, L. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., Vanden Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, B., Zucker, S., & Brehm, K. (2004). Resilient classrooms: Creating healthy environments for learning. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, J. (2005). Changes in students’ use of life long learning skills during problem based learning project. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18, 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition: A textbook for cognitive, educational, life span & applied psychology (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2009). Mindset, the new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Feiz, P., Hooman, H. A., & Kooshki, S. (2013). Assessing the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in Iranian students: Construct validity and reliability. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1820–1825.
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Vanden Bossche, P., & Segers, N. (2005). Effect of problem based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B. (2008). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Innabi, H., & Sheik, O. (2006). The change in mathematics teachers' perceptions of critical thinking after 15 years of educational reform in Jordan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Karadeniz, S., Büyüköztürk, S., Akgün, O. E., Çakmak, E. K., & Demirel, F. (2008). The Turkish adaptation study of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for 12–18 year old children: Results of confirmatory factor analysis 1. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4). Retrieved from www.tojet.net/articles/v7i4/7412.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kazelskis, R., Reeves, C., Kersh, M. E., Bailey, G., Cole, K., Larmon, M., … Halliday, D. C. (2000). Mathematics anxiety and test anxiety: Separate construct. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larmer, J., Ross, D., & Mergendoller, J. (2009). PBL starter kit: To-the-point advice, tools, and tips for your first project in middle or high school. San Rafael, CA: Unicorn Printing Specialists.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. I. (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS One, 7(10), e48076. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, S. (2000). Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: An exploratory look through the class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 454–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young acolescents' course enrollment and intention and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. K., Turner, J. C., & Spencer, C A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students' motivation and strategies in project based learning. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 501–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,4615,7-140-6530_6598_36168-188305--,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/b1014_13final_454424_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/b1014_13final_454424_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. R. (2011). The effects of constructivist classroom contextual factors in a life science laboratory and a traditional science classroom on elementary students' motivation and learning strategies. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2009: National Assessment of Educational Progress Grade 8 National ( NCES 2010-451). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2010451.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=514.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011: National Assessment of Educational Progress Grade 8 National ( NCES 2012-458). Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/math_2011/gr8_national.asp
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Educational psychology, developing learners (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Essentials of educational psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A. (2004). Integrating curriculum instruction and assessment in project based instruction: A case study of an experienced teacher. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 447–460.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 811–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PLAN Test. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.studypoint.com/ed/plan-test/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1996). Neverstreaming: Preventing learning disabilities. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. (2001). Classroom context effects on young children's motivation. In F. Salili, C. Y. Chiu, & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 273–292). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffa, R., Kush, J. C., & Heo, M. (2010). Using the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire and the strategy inventory for language learning in assessing motivation and learning strategies of generation 1.5 Korean immigrant students. Education Research International, 2011, Article ID 491276.
   Google Scholar
• Strobel, J., & Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 3, 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tatum, B. (1997). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?”: And other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research/summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Timpson, W. (2003). Teaching diversity: Challenges and complexities, identities and integrity. Madison, WI: Atwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tintle, N., Chance, B., Cobb, G., Rossman, A., Roy, S., Swanson, T., & Vanderstoep, J. (2014). Introduction to statistical investigations, preliminary edition ( rev. ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• University of Wisconsin Whitewater. (2005). Reluctance and conflict in the classroom. Retrieved from https://www.uww.edu/learn/improving/aboutdiversity/approachdiversity/reluctanceconflict.
   Google Scholar
• VanderStoep, S., & Pintrich, R. (2008). Learning to learn: The skill and will of college success (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, D. T., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A Meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta-analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 3, 12–43.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2004). Attribution theory revisited: Transforming cultural plurality into theoretical unity. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 13–29). Grenwich, Ct.: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 73–84). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, T. (2000). Cooperative student activities as learning devices. Analytical Chemistry, 72, 293–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. W. (2011). Resistance to classroom participation: Minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole class discussions. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10, 250–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, V. M., & Rowe, M. W. (2002). Group problem-solving versus lecture in college level quantitative analysis: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 1131–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-VanVoorhis, C., & Morgan, B. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar