Measuring and comparing academic language development and conceptual understanding via science notebooks

References

• Abella, R. (2005). An examination of the validity of English-language achievement test scores in an English Language Learner population. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
   Google Scholar
• August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 345–376.
   Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C., Schueller, J., Wilde, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2007). Gender equity in foreign and second language learning. In S. S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed., pp. 305–334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. B., & Nesbit, C. N. (2008). Using science notebooks to improve writing skills and conceptual understanding. Science Activities, 44, 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 631–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education ( NCES 2009-161). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Hand, B., & McDowell, L. (2013). The effects of writing-to-learn-activities on elementary students’ conceptual understanding: Learning about force and motion through writing to older peers. Science Education, 97, 745–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163, 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2004). Scientific literacy: A systematic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89, 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 262–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 417–439.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gunel, M., Hand, B., & McDermott, A. (2009). Writing for different audiences: Effects on high-school students’ conceptual understanding of biology. Learning and Instruction, 19, 354–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halldén, O. (1999). Conceptual change and contextualization. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 53–66). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: literary and discursive power. London, England: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Wallance, C. W., & Yang.   (2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., & Irby, B. J. (2014). Developing and validating a science notebook rubric for fifth grade non-mainstream students. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1849–1870.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, M., & Jackson, J. (2010). Connecting literacy and science to increase achievement for English language learners. Early Education Childhood Education Journal, 38, 205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1010–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 676–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 29, 1168–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhass, K., Lin, H., & Chu, K. (2010). Disaggregated outcomes of gender, ethnicity, and poverty on fifth grade science performance. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 33, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school learners' science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention's impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 857–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 8, 269–297.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2005). Dilemmas in scaling up innovations in elementary science instruction with nonmainstream students. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 411–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a First-Year Professional Development Intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Mahotiere, M., Salinas, A., Penfield, R. D., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Science writing achievement among English language learners: Results of three-year intervention in urban elementary schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 32, 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42, 223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 912–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The nation's report card: Science 2011 (NCES 2012-465). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutta, J. W., Bautista, N. U., Butler, M. B. (2011). Teaching science to English language learners. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to using SPSS. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, E. W. (2001). Structuring the composition process in scientific writing. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). Evaluating students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1477–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo, K. (2010). Learning science, talking science: The impact of technology-enhanced curriculum on students’ science learning in linguistically diverse classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework. Technical report, University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pd082d4.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. M., Lyon, E. G., Stoddart, T., Mosqueda, E., & Menon, P. (2014). Improving science and literacy learning for English Language Learners: Evidence from a pre-service teacher preparation intervention. Journal of Science Teacher Education, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9376-6.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2010). 2009-10 State performance report. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2010/state.html
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2008). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., Fan, Y., & Huerta, M. (2014b). A randomized study of a literacy integrated science intervention for low SES middle school students: Findings from first year implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2083–2109.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Koch, J. (2014). Integrating literacy and science for fifth grade English language learners: From learning to read to reading to learn. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(5), 410–426.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 689–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L., Hand, B., Goldman, S., Hildebrand, G., Osborne, J., Treagust, D., & Wallace, C. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar