1,841
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Academic growth trajectories of ELLs in NAEP data: The case of fourth- and eighth-grade ELLs and non-ELLs on mathematics and reading tests

, &
Pages 541-553 | Received 11 Apr 2014, Accepted 25 Nov 2014, Published online: 27 May 2016

References

  • Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–136.
  • Aud, S., Hussar, W., Johnson, F., Kena, G., Roth, E., Manning, E., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2012). The Condition of Education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
  • Capraro, R. M., Young, J. R., Lewis, C. W., Yetkiner, Z. E., & Woods M. N. (2009). An examination of mathematics achievement and growth in a midwestern urban school district: Implications for teachers and administrators. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2, 46–65.
  • Chamot, A.U. (2009). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Coley, R. (2003). Growth in school revisited: Achievement gains from the fourth to the eighth grade (ETS Policy Information Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press Inc.
  • Crawford, J. (2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom. Los Angeles, CA: Bilingual Education Services.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Echevarría, J., Vogt, M.E., & Short, D.J. (2013). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Fuller, B., Wright, J., Gesicki, K., & Kang, E. (2007). Gauging growth: How to judge No Child Left Behind? Educational Researcher, 36, 268–278.
  • Guglielmi, R. S. (2012). Math and science achievement in English language learners: A multivariate latent growth modeling of predictors, mediators, and moderators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 580–602.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–446, § 104, Stat. 1142 (2004).
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
  • Kieffer, M. J. (2011). Converging trajectories: Reading growth in language minority learners and their classmates, kindergarten to grade 8. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1187–1225.
  • Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? Educational Researcher, 31, 3–12.
  • Lee, J. (2010). Tripartite growth trajectories of reading and math achievement tracking national academic progress at primary, middle, and high school levels. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 800–832.
  • Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., Leroy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 31–52.
  • Lubienski, S. T. & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 651–698.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eighth-grade mathematics and science teaching, learning, curriculum, and achievement in international context. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
  • National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2011). The growing numbers of English learner students, 1998/99–2008/09. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition.
  • Nieto, S. (Ed.) (2005). Why we teach. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). Social policies and data. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Polat, N. (2010). A comparative analysis of pre-and in-service teacher beliefs about readiness and self-competency: Revisiting teacher education for ELLs. System, 38, 228–244.
  • Polat, N., & Mahalingappa, L. (2013). Examining service and gender effects on teacher beliefs about ELLs in content area classes: A case for inclusion, responsibility and instructional support. Teaching Education, 24, 58–83.
  • Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Sanderson, H. L., & Harrington, P. (2005). Trends and patterns of Utah's white and Hispanic 4th grade students compared to the nation: An NAEP achievement gap analysis. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah State Office of Education.
  • Shin, H. B., & Ortman, J. M. (2011, August). Language projections: 2010–2020. Paper presented at Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas, NV.
  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York, NY: Summit Books.
  • Tableau Software. (2013). Tableau software desktop: Personal Edition version 8.0.0. Seattle, WA: Tableau Software.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students. (2008). Biennial Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Title III State Formula Grant Program, School Years 2004–2006. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/index.html?src=ln
  • Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2005). Comparative studies on US and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–13.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.