1,791
Views
58
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Joint trajectories of behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in elementary school

&
Pages 188-198 | Received 04 Mar 2015, Accepted 06 Jun 2015, Published online: 02 Sep 2016

References

  • Ablard, K. E., & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.94.
  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359.
  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short—and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801–814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02944.x.
  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
  • Archambault, I., Eccles, J. S., & Vida, M. N. (2010). Ability self-concept and subjective task value in literacy: Joint trajectories from grade 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 804–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021075.
  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007.18708246.
  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79, 402–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00428.x.
  • Archambault, I., & Vandenbossche-Makombo, J. (2013). Validation de l’Échelle des dimensions de l'engagement scolaire (EDES) chez les élèves du primaire [Validation of the Classroom Engagement Scale in elementary school]. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 46, 175–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031951.
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–149.
  • Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363.
  • Bowers, A. J., Sprott, R., & Taff, S. A. (2013). Do we know who will drop out? A review of the predictors of dropping out of high school: Precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The High School Journal, 96, 77–100.
  • Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., Lehr, C. A., & Godber, Y. (2001). Promoting successful school completion: Critical conceptual and methodological guidelines. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 468–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/scpq.16.4.468.19898.
  • Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461388.
  • DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliot, S. N. (2001). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the mini-series. School Psychology Review, 31, 293–297.
  • Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning?. School Psychology Review, 36, 413–432.
  • Eccles, J. S., O'Neill, S. A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task values in adolescents and children. In K. A. Moore, & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 237–249). New York, NY: Springer Science.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit In M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol 1. Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 404–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Eccles, J. A., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self—and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x.
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
  • Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2005). Behavioral predictors of changes in social relatedness and liking school in elementary years. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 281–301.
  • Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431693013001002.
  • Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
  • Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900–1902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1128898.
  • Henricsson, L., & Rydell, A. (2004). Elementary school children with behavior problems: Teacher—child relations and self-perception. A prospective study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 111–138.
  • Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1.
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one though twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
  • Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Towards an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–28.
  • Junod, R. E. V., DuPaul, G. J., Jitendra, A. K., Volpe, R. J., & Cleary, K. S. (2006). Classroom observations of students with and without ADHD: Differences across types of engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 87–104.
  • Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L. (1995). A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 928–934. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2291327.
  • Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence?. Child Development, 70, 1373–1400.
  • Ladd, G. W., Buhs, E. S., & Seid, M. (2000). Children's initial sentiments about kindergarten: Is school liking an antecedent of early classroom participation and achievement?. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 255–279.
  • Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children's achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 190–206.
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66, 164–187.
  • Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021307.21244162.
  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.
  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 120–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001.
  • Luo, W., Hughes, J. N., Liew, J., & Kwok, O. (2009). Classifying academically at-risk first graders into engagement types: Association with long-term achievement trajectories. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 380–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593939.
  • Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153.
  • McClelland, M., Morrison, F., & Holmes, D. (2000). Children at risk for early academic problems: The role of learning-related social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 307–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00069-7.
  • McDermott, P. A., Mordell, M., & Stoltzfus, J. C. (2001). The organization of student performance in American schools: Discipline, motivation, verbal learning, nonverbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 65–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-O663.93.1.65.
  • McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.
  • McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.
  • Muthén, B. O. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class-latent growth modeling. In L. M. Collins, & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291–322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10409-010.
  • Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s515328007SEM0901.8.
  • Muthén, B. O. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 369–377.
  • Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variables analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412986311.n19.
  • Muthén, B. O., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469.
  • National Household Survey. (2013). Immigration and ethnocultural diversity in Canada. Statistic Canada. Ministry of Industry. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/99-010-x2011001-eng.cfm.
  • Pagani, L. S., Fitzpatrick, C., & Parent, S. (2012). Relating kindergarten attention to subsequent developmental pathways of classroom engagement in elementary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 715–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9605-4.
  • Pianta, R. C. (2001). STRS: Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
  • Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 901–916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030196.23025924.
  • Quebec Ministry of Families and Seniors. (2011). [Statistical portrait of Quebec families]. Retrieved from: https://www.mfa.gouv.qc.ca/fr/publication/Documents/SF_Portrait_stat_complet_11.pdf.
  • Ramaswamy, V., DeSarbo, W., Reibstein, D., & Robinson, W. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.1.103.
  • Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 105–176). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Ready, D. D., LoGerfo, L. F., Burkum, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (2005). Explaining girls' advantages in kindergarten literacy learning: Do classroom behaviors make a difference?. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/496905.
  • Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.
  • Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
  • Sclove, L. S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360.
  • Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41, 3–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09334861.
  • Sirin, S. R., & Rogers-Sirin, L. (2004). Exploring school engagement of middle-class African American adolescents. Youth & Society, 35, 323–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X03255006.
  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.
  • Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), The handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–41). New York, NY: Springer Science.
  • Stockard, J. (2010). Promoting reading achievement and countering the “fourth-grade slump”: The impact of Direct Instruction on reading achievement in fifth grade. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15, 218–240.
  • Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730.
  • Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Swanson, J., & Reiser, M. (2008). Prediction of children's academic competence from their effortful control, relationships, and classroom participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.67.
  • Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents' self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th—through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556–1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x.
  • Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x.
  • Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.76.
  • Wilson, K. M., & Trainin, G. (2007). First-grade students' motivation and achievement for reading, writing, and spelling. Reading Psychology, 28, 257–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710601186464.
  • Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.