658
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mediation in the relationship among EL status, vocabulary, and science reading comprehension

, , &
Pages 665-674 | Received 09 Dec 2015, Accepted 31 Mar 2016, Published online: 16 Sep 2016

References

  • Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualisms. Review of Educational Research, 80, 207–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654310368803
  • Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Researcher Journal, 26, 213–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2002.10668709
  • Ardasheva, Y., Firestone, J. B., Lamb, R., & Newcomer, S. N. (April, 2016). Contributions of strategies, self-efficacy, and general and technical vocabulary to science reading comprehension among ELs. Roundtable presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Washington, DC.
  • Ardasheva, Y., Norton-Meier, L., & Hand, B. (2015). Negotiation, embeddedness, and non-threatening learning environments as themes of science and language convergence for English language learners. Studies in Science Education, 51(2), 201–249. doi:10.1080/03057267.2015.1078019
  • Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2015). Developing science-specific, technical vocabulary of high-school newcomer English learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Published online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13670050.2015.1042356?journalCode=rbeb20
  • Ardasheva, Y., Tretter, T. R., & Kinny, M. (2012). English language learners and academic achievement: Revisiting the threshold hypothesis. Language Learning, 62(3), 769–812. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00652.x
  • August, D., Artzi, L., & Barr, C. (2015). Helping ELLs meet standards in English language arts and science: An intervention focused on academic vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34, 373–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1039738
  • August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 345–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345740903217623
  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Baroody, A. E., Merritt, E. G., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2014). Examining math and science self-efficacy and anxiety in fifth grade English learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Philadelphia.
  • Barr, C., August, D., & Artzi, L. (2014, April). Investigating different methods of vocabulary instruction in a science summer school program for English learners in elementary school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children's oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 251–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/511706
  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498–520. http://dx.doi.org/2111/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498
  • British Council. (2013). The English effect: The impact of English, what it's worth to the UK and why it matters to the world. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/organisation/publications/the-english-effect
  • Brown, J., Miller, J., & Mitchell, J. (2006). Interrupted schooling and the acquisition of literacy: Experiences of Sudanese refugees in Victorian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29, 150–162.
  • Buxton, C., & Lee, O. (2014). English learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K Abell (Eds), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 204–223). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., … White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
  • Cervetti, G., Pearson, P. D., Bravo, M. A., & Barber, J. (2006). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy, & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 221–244). Arlington, VA: NSTA.
  • Cisco, B. K., & Padrón, Y. (2012). Investigating vocabulary and reading strategies with middle grades English language learners: A Research Synthesis. RMLE Online, 36(4), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2012.11462097
  • Cook, G., Boals, T., & Lundberg, T. (2011, November). Academic achievement for English Learners—What can we reasonably expect? Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 66–69.
  • Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. doi: 10.2307/3587951
  • Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English language learners and English-only students? Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 241–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01501.x
  • CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2013). Washington English Language Proficiency Assessment (WELPA) [Technical Report 2011–2012 School Year]. Monterey, CA: Author.
  • CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2014). Washington English Language Proficiency Assessment: Interpretation guide. Monterey, CA: Author.
  • Dalton, S. (1979). Validation of the Language Assessment Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 1001–1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316447903900439
  • Duncan, S. E., & De Avila, E. A. (1994). Language Assessment Scale (LAS-O). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
  • Editorial Projects in Education. (2009). Quality Counts 2009: Portrait of a population—How English-language learners are putting schools to the test [Special issue]. Education Week, 28(17).
  • Fang, Z. (2008). Going beyond the fab five: Helping students cope with the unique linguistic challenges of expository reading in intermediate grades. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 476–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/jaal.51.6.
  • Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Technicality and reasoning in Science: Beyond vocabulary. In Z. Fang & M. J. Schleppegrell (Eds.), Reading in secondary content areas (pp. 18–38). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Fazio, X., & Gallagher, T. L. (2014). Morphological development levels of science content vocabulary: Implications for science-based texts in elementary classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1407–1423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9470-4
  • Fisher, P. J., & Blachowicz, C. L. (2013). A few words about math and science. Educational Leadership, 71(3), 46–51.
  • Ford-Connors, E., & Paratore, J. R. (2015). Vocabulary instruction in fifth grade and beyond: Sources of word learning and productive contexts for development. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 50–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540943
  • Hakuta, K., Butler, Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? ( Policy Report 2000-1). San Francisco, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
  • Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949377
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hwang, J. K., Lawrence, J. F., Mo, E., & Snow, C. E. (2014). Differential effects of a systematic vocabulary intervention on adolescent language minority students with varying levels of English proficiency. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 314–332.
  • Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 31–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001067
  • Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 90–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.1.5
  • Kim, J., & Herman, J. L. (2009). A three-state study of English learner progress. Educational Assessment, 14, 212–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627190903422831
  • Lawrence, J. F., Capotosto, L., Branum-Martin, L., White, C., & Snow, C. E. (2012). Language proficiency, home-language status, and English vocabulary development: A longitudinal follow-up of the Word Generation program. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 437–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000393
  • Lazarin, M. (2006). Improving assessment and accountability for English language learners in the No Child Left Behind Act. ( Issue Brief No. 6). Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza.
  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004491
  • Lee, O., Deaktor, R., Enders, C., & Lambert, J. (2008). Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 726–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20231
  • Lee, O., Penfield, R. D., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Effects of fidelity of implementation on science achievement gains among English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 836–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20335
  • Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners: Language demands and opportunities in relation to Next Generation Science Standards. Educational Researcher, 42, 223–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
  • Lesaux, N. K., (with Koda, K., Siegel, L. S., & Shanahan, T). (2006). Development of literacy of language minority learners. In D. L. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in a second language: Report of the National Literacy Panel (pp. 75–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Faller, S. E., & Kelley, J. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 196–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3
  • Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 921–946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20080
  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). “Something to shoot for”: A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A. Johns, (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 17–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Maerten-Rivera, J., Myers, N., Lee, O., & Penfield, R. (2010). Student and school predictors of high-stakes assessment in science. Science Education, 94, 937–962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20408
  • Mahon, E. A. (2006). High-stakes testing and English language learners: Questions of validity. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 479–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2006.10162886
  • Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 701–711. http://dx.doi.org/2111/10.1037/a0019135
  • Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 571–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690701744611
  • Miller, J., Mitchell, J., & Brown, J. (2005). African refugees with interrupted schooling in the high school mainstream: Dilemmas for teachers and students. Prospect Journal: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20, 19–33.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). English language earners. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
  • National Commission of Science and Mathematics Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). The Glenn commission report: Before it's too late. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://modeling.asu.edu/GlennReport2000.pdf
  • New York City Department of Education. (2009). Diverse learners on the road to success: The performance of New York City's English language learners. New York, NY: Author.
  • O'Donnell, C. (2008). Catastrophic events (2nd ed.). Burlington, NC: Carolina Biological Supply Company.
  • Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246.
  • Richardson Bruna, K., Roberta, V., & Perales Escudero, M. (2007). What's language got to do with it? A case study of academic language instruction in a high school “English Learner Science” class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 36–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.00
  • Samson, J. F., & Collins, B. A. (2012). Preparing all teachers to meet the needs of English language learners: Applying research to policy and practice for teacher effectiveness. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103
  • Schrank, F. A., Fletcher, T. V., & Alvarado, C. G. (1996). Comparative validity of three English oral language proficiency tests. Bilingual Research Journal, 20, 55–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1996.10668620
  • Scott, J., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Asselin, M. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty three Canadian upper-elementary classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 269–286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002272
  • Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328, 450–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
  • Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
  • Taboada, A. (2012). Relationships of general vocabulary, science vocabulary, and student questioning with science comprehension in students with varying levels of English proficiency. Instructional Science, 40, 901–923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9196-z
  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa-Cruz, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
  • Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Koch, J. (2014). Integrating literacy and science for English language learners: From learning-to-read to reading-to-learn. The Journal of Educational Research. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220671.2013.833072#.U5iywvldWvw
  • Torres, H. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2002). The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7683/5450
  • Townsend, D., & Collins, P. (2009). Academic vocabulary and middle school English learners: An intervention study. Reading and Writing, 22, 993–1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y
  • Umbel, V. M., Pearson, B. Z., Fernandez, M. C., & Oller, D. K. (1992). Measuring bilingual children's receptive vocabularies. Child Development, 63, 1012–1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01678.x
  • Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 93–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00135.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.