A mixed methods comparison of teachers' lunar modeling lesson implementation and student learning outcomes

References

• Black, A. A. (2004). Relationship of earth science misconceptions and conceptual understandings with three types of spatial abilities in university non-science majors. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., Wilhelm, J., & Yang, H. (2015). Student moon observations and spatial-scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1815–1833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Goldberg, J. (2004). Inquiry in interaction: How local adaptations of curricula shape classroom communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 905–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes C., Biggers, M., & Zangori, L. (2013). Investigating essential characteristics of scientific practices in elementary science learning environments: The practices of science observation protocol (P-SOP). School Science and Mathematics, 113, 180–190.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C., & Davis, E. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 820–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulwiler, B. R. (2007). Writing in science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. Research in Physics Education, Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington. Retrieved from http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/lpb/mud-history.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., Wilhelm, J., Lamar, M., & Cole, M. (2015). Gender and racial differences: Development of sixth grade students’ geometric spatial visualization within an earth/space unit. School Science and Mathematics, 115(7), 330–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, P., Eberle, F., & Farrin, L. (2005). Uncovering student ideas in science; 25 formative assessment probes, volume 1. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, P., & Tugel, J. (2009). Uncovering student ideas in science; 25 formative assessment probes, volume 4. Arlington, VA: NSTA press.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, M. M. (2013). Making meaning of scientific practices: Exploring the pathways and variations of classrooms engaging in science practices (Order No. 3556621). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.uky.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1328169307?accountid=11836
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, R., & Olsen, J. P. (2002). Developing the lunar phases concept inventory. In S. Franklin J. Marx, & K. Cummings (Eds.), Physics education research conference proceeding. New York, NY: PERC. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/per/perc/conference.cfm?Y=2002
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 258–271.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. E. (1983). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1983). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (Order No. 8314481).
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S. & Hedges, L. (2004). How large are teacher effects?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D. (2009). Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., Wasko, K. D., & Slagle, C. (2011). Children leaning to explain daily celestial motion: Understanding astronomy across moving frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1963–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribyl, J. R., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. D. (1990). Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional conceptualization in astronomy education (Order No. 9121651). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.uky.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/303866356?accountid=11836
   Google Scholar
• Riel, M. & Polin, L. (2004). Learning communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical support. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 16–52). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorby, S. A. (2007). Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Association of Engineering Education, 13, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87, 468–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurber, J. (1943). Many moons. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright, C., Morrell, P. D., Flick, L., & Schepige, A. (2004). Observation of reform teaching in undergraduate level mathematics and science courses. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 322–335.
   Google Scholar
• Wellner, K. L. (1995). A correlational study of seven projective spatial structures with regard to the phases of the moon (Order No. 9536267). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.uky.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/304185041?accountid=11836
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, R., & Wilhelm, J. (2007). Realistic Explorations in Astronomical Learning. The REAL Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. (2009). Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2105–2122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Jackson, C., Sullivan, A., & Wilhelm, R. (2013). Examining differences between preteen groups’ spatial-scientific understandings: A quasi-experimental study. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Toland, M., Jackson, C., Cole, M., & Wilhelm, R. (2014). How Instruction, Gender, and Race Affect Students' Spatial-Scientific Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, NARST – Pittsburgh, PA (March 30-April 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Forbes C., & Biggers, M. (2013). Fostering student sense making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers' use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 989–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar