Representation visuals' impacts on science interest and reading comprehension of adolescent English learners

References

• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12, 411–428. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apriani, W., Vianty, M., & Loeneto, B. A. (2015). The use of English comic book series in teaching reading comprehension. Journal of English Literacy Education, 1(2), 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y. (2016). A structural equation modeling investigation of relationships among school-aged ELLs’ individual difference characteristics and academic and second language outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 194–206. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y. (2017). Scaffolding science vocabulary for middle school newcomer ELLs. In L. C. de Oliveira, & K. Campbell Wilcox (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Preparing pre-service and in-service teachers (pp. 219–241). Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., Bowden, J. O., Morrison, J. A., & Tretter, T. R. (2015). Comic relief: Using comic and illustrated trade books to support science learning in first year English language learners. Science Scope, 38(6), 39–47. doi:10.2505/4/ss15_038_06_39
   Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. (2017). Mediation in the relationship among EL status, vocabulary, and science reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 110(6), 665–674. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1175407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., Norton-Meier, L., & Hand, B. (2015). Negotiation, embeddedness, and non-threatening learning environments as themes of science and language convergence for English language learners. Studies in Science Education, 51(2), 201–249. doi:10.1080/03057267.2015.1078019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., Tong, S., & Tretter, T. R. (2012). Validating the English Language Learner Motivation Scale (ELLMS) to measure language learning motivational orientations among school-aged ELLs. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 473–483. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2017). Developing science-specific, technical vocabulary of high-school newcomer English learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 252–271. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1042356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., Tretter, T. R., & Kinny, M. (2012). English language learners and academic achievement: Revisiting the threshold hypothesis. Language Learning, 62(3), 769–812. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00652.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshbacher, P., Ing, M., & Tsai, S. M. (2013). Boosting student interest in science: Adults could do so much more to excite students interest about science as a subject and encourage their interest in science careers. Phi Delta Kappan, 95, 47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 345–376. doi:10.1080/19345740903217623
   Google Scholar
• August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Council. (2013). The English effect: The impact of English, what it's worth to the UK and why it matters to the world. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/organisation/publications/the-english-effect
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & McClung, N. (2015). Factors that influence the difficulty of science words. Journal of Literacy Research, 47, 153–185. doi:10.1177/1086296X15615363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 383–400. doi:10.1348/000709901158578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., & Ennis, C. D. (2004). Goals, interests, and learning in physical education, The Journal of Educational Research, 97, 329–339. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.6.329-339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Xu, Y., & Rhodes, J. A. (2010). Examining English language learners motivation of, and engagement in, reading: A qualitative study. The Reading Matrix, 10, 205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210. doi:10.1007/BF01320076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2013). Washington English Language Proficiency Assessment (WELPA) [Technical Report 2011–2012 School Year]. Monterey, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2014). Washington English Language Proficiency Assessment: Interpretation guide. Monterey, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., & Wolniak, G. C. (2013). College student pathways to the STEM disciplines. Teachers College Record, 115, 2013, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erfani, S. M. (2012). Pictures speak louder than words in ESP, too! English Language Teaching, 5, 164–169.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2008). Going beyond the fab five: Helping students cope with the unique linguistic challenges of expository reading in intermediate grades. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 476–487. doi:10.1598/jaal.51.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraleigh-Lohrfinka, K. J., Schneider, M. V., Whittington, D., & Feinberg, A. P. (2013). Increase in science research commitment in a didactic and laboratory-based program targeted to gifted minority high-school students. Roeper Review, 35, 18–26. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.740599
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannus, M., & Hyona, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95–123. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261–280. doi:10.1080/10573560590949377
   Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92–102. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 191–209. doi:10.1023/A:1016667621114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the short circuit in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in the L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00516.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoii, R., & Forouzesh, Z. (2010). Using comic strips with reading texts: Are we making a mistake? Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1, 168–177. doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2010.0024
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Faller, S. E., & Kelley, J. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 196–228. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. F., Lin, H. S., Lee, L., & Yore, L. D. (2015). Are science comics a good medium for science communication? The case for public learning of nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 276–294. doi:10.1080/21548455.2014.941040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2004). Effects of comic strips on L2 learners' reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 225–243. doi: 10.2307/3588379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 921–946. doi:10.1002/tea.20080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 669–685. doi: 10.1080/09500690902792385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877–907. doi:10.1002/sce.20441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melguizo, T., & Wolniak, G. C. (2012). The earnings benefits of majoring in STEM fields among high achieving minority students. Research in Higher Education, 53, 383–405. doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9238-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 571–592. doi:10.1080/09500690701744611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Mitchell, J., & Brown, J. (2005). African refugees with interrupted schooling in the high school mainstream: Dilemmas for teachers and students. Prospect Journal: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20(2), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mizumoto, A. (2013). Enhancing self-efficacy in vocabulary learning: A self-regulated learning approach. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2, 15–24. doi:10.7820/vli.v02.1.mizumoto
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). English language earners. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Science Resources Center [NSRC] (2006). Energy, machines, and motion (2nd ed.). Burlington, NC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R. R. (2012). Reading the graphics: What is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Reading and Writing, 25, 739–774. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9298-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., & Petrides, A. (2007). Sex-differences in the effects of interest on boys' and girls' reading comprehension. The British Psychological Society, 98, 223–235. doi:10.1348/000712606X117649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (2006, September). Dual coding theory and education. Paper presented at Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children conference, MI: University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/∼nschwartz/paivio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peregoy, S., & Boyle, O. (2012). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL: A resource book for teaching K-12 English learners (6th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Piaw, C. Y. (2012, November). Using content-based humorous cartoons in learning materials to improve students' reading rate, comprehension and motivation: It is a wrong technique? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 352–361. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.042
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2013). Language demands and opportunities in relation to Next Generation Science Standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Understanding Language Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7, 216–237. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusted, J., & Coltheart, V. (1979). The effect of pictures on the retention of novel words and prose passages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 516–524. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(79)90078-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463. doi:10.1002/RRQ.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23–52. doi:10.1023/A:1009004801455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2001). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5, 270–290. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.3.270
   Google Scholar
• Slough, S., McTigue, E. M., Kim, S., & Jennings, S. (2010). Science textbooks' use of graphical representation: Descriptive analysis of four sixth-grade science texts. Reading Psychology, 31, 301–325. doi:10.1080/02702710903256502
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. Y., Lovett, S. B., & Scher, M. S. (1993). Pictures facilitate children's recall of unillustrated expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 520–528. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1618–1625. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, A. (2012). Relationships of general vocabulary, science vocabulary, and student questioning with science comprehension in students with varying levels of English proficiency. Instructional science, 40, 901–923. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, G. (1992). The effects of graphic representation on knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 177–195. doi:10.1017/S0272263100010810
   Google Scholar
• Tretter, T. R., Ardasheva, Y., Bookstrom, E., Bowden, J., & Duckwall, M., (2015). Planetariumbased science visualizations to support complex science learning for first-year middle and high school English language learners. In K. D. Finson, & J. Pedersen (Eds.), Application of visual data in K-16 science classrooms (pp. 3–26). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Uccelli, P., Galloway, E. P., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A., & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond Vocabulary: Exploring Cross-Disciplinary Academic-Language Proficiency and Its Association With Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 337–356. doi:10.1002/rrq.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, P. (2010).W. Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453–456. doi:10.1126/science.1182594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinisha, K., & Ramadas, J. (2013). Visual representations of the water cycle in science textbooks. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 10, 7–36. doi:10.1177/0973184912465157
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. O. (2016). Exploring the effects of seductive details with the 4-phase model of interest. Learning and Motivation, 55, 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitkamp, E., & Burnet, F. (2007). The Chemedian brings laughter to the chemistry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1911–1929. doi:10.1080/09500690701222790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. L., Eslami, Z., McTigue, E., & Reynolds, D. (2015). Picture perfect: Using quality graphics to support English language learners in science classes. The Science Teacher, 82(4), 41–46. doi:10.2505/4/tst15_082_04_41
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. L., McTigue, E. M., Eslami, Z. R., & Reynolds, D. (2014). More than just eye-catching: Evaluating graphic quality in middle school English language learners' science textbooks. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8, 89–109. doi:10.3776/joci.2014.v8n2p89-109
   Google Scholar
• Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 93–116. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00135.x
   Google Scholar