Predicting self-efficacy in test preparation: Gender, value, anxiety, test performance, and strategies

References

• Alderson, J. C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13, 280–297. doi: 10.1177/026553229601300304
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115–129. doi: 10.1093/applin/14.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257–279. doi: 10.1177/026553229601300303
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1996). Methods for teaching learning strategies in the foreign language classroom. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 175–188). Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Tsai, Y. (2012). Research on English teaching and learning: Taiwan (2004-2009). Language Teaching, 45, 180–201. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 175–194. doi: 10.1002/rrq.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2015). Impacts of the Test of English Listening Comprehension on students' English learning expectations in Taiwan. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 191–208. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2015.1027216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2017a). A task-based language teaching approach to developing metacognitive strategies for listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 31, 51–70. doi: 10.1080/10904018.2015.1098542
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2017b). English language education in formal and cram school contexts: An analysis of listening strategy and learning style. Education 3–13, 45, 419–436. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2015.1103768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 349–364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00993x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2006). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 307–331. doi: 10.1080/15434300701333129
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2007). Coming to terms with language learner strategies. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learners strategies (pp. 29–45). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2010). Focus on the language learner: Styles, strategies and motivation. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 161–178). London, UK: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 165–172.
   Google Scholar
• D'Lima, G. M., Winsler, A., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Ethnic and gender differences in first-year college students' goal orientation, self-efficacy, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 341–356. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.823366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 206–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golchi, M. M. (2012). Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2, 115–128. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v2n4p115
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2006). Washback to learners: Learner and teacher perspectives on IELTS preparation course expectations and outcomes. Assessing Writing, 11, 113–134. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Hong, E., & Peng, Y. (2008). Do Chinese students' perceptions of test value affect test performance? Mediating role of motivational and metacognitive regulation in test preparation. Learning and Instruction, 18, 499–512. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., Tallon, M., & Luo, H. (2009). Foreign language anxiety. In J. C. Cassady (Ed.), Anxiety in schools: The causes, consequences, and solutions for academic anxieties (pp. 96–118). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1–35. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., & Yang, H. (2006). The English proficiency of college and university students in China: As reflected in the CET. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19, 21–36. doi: 10.1080/07908310608668752
   Google Scholar
• Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 649–663. doi: 10.1037/a0024048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Zhong, Q., & Suen, H. K. (2012). Students' perceptions of the impact of the College English Test. Language Testing in Asia, 2, 77–94. doi: 10.1186/2229-0443-2-3-77
   Google Scholar
• Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119–137. doi: 10.1080/10573560308223
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. J. (2008). Confronting challenges: Motivational beliefs and learning strategies in difficult college course. College Student Journal, 42, 416–421.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. J. (2010). Motivational beliefs and learning strategies as predictors of academic performance in college physics. College Student Journal, 44, 920–927.
   Google Scholar
• Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age, and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338–352. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 218–227. doi: 10.1177/10534512060410040401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, S., & Gobel, P. (2004). Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom. System, 32, 21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2003.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57, 417–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching: Language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353–360. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 366–381. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual (6th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, G.-P., & French, B. F. (2013). Gender differences in the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale. System, 41, 462–471. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, H. P. (2014). Self-efficacy, reflection, and achievement: A short-term longitudinal examination. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 90–102. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2012.753860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategy for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H, & Zimmerman, B. J (1998).(Eds.). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 291–329. 10.3200/JEXE.73.4.291-329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi: Doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2013). Do test preparation work? Implications for score validity. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10, 196–218. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2012.721423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2015). Do component weighting and testing method affect time management and approaches to test preparation? A study on the washback mechanism. System, 50, 56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar