A path analytic model linking foundational skills to Grade 3 state reading achievement

References

• Aghababian, V., & Nazir, N. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123–150. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, D. (1992). The prosody of oral reading and stages of word knowledge. In S. Templeton & D. R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 137–189). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–092. Newbury Park, CA Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. New York, NY: American Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (2003). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & T. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 313–338). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice ( vol. 5, pp.) 1–82. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6–23). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts &literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO & National Governors Association.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorey, N., & Polikoff, M. (2016). Evaluating the content and quality of next generation assessments. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http:\\west2.amazonaws.com/%2802.09%20%20Final%20Published%29%20Evaluating%20th e%20Content%20and%20Quality%20of%20Next%20Generation%20Assessments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency's unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30, 166–175.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1, 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1993). How English orthography influences phonological knowledge as children learn to read and spell. In R. J. Scales (Ed.), Literacy and language analysis (pp. 21–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Riben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research theory and practices across languages (pp. 237–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21. doi: 10.80/10888438.2013.819356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Saltmarsh, J. (1995). Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sight. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 295–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Petscher, Y., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Florida assessment for instruction in reading, aligned to the language arts Florida standards: FAIR-FS, grades 3–12, technical manual. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Foorman%2c±Petscher%2c±%26±Schatschneider±2015&id=ED565887
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ganske, K. (1994). Developmental spelling analysis: A diagnostic measure for instruction and research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Ganske, K. (2014). Word journeys: Assessment-guided phonic, spelling, and vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, R. J. (2000). A retrospective on invented spelling and a look forward. The Reading Teacher, 54, 318–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatthorn, A. A., Jailall, J. M., & Jailall, J. K. (2016).The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analysis of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40, 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, A. J., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (2002). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. H., & Templeton, S. (1986). A developmental perspective of formal spelling instruction through alphabet, pattern, and meaning. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 314–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, M. F., Brasseur, I. F., Deshler, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A., & Stibling, J. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of struggling adolescent readers in urban schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. F., Torgesen, J. K., Lane, H. B., & Turner, S. J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25, 483–507. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucer, S. B. (2009). Examining the relationship between text processing and text comprehension in fourth grader readers. Reading Psychology, 30, 340–358. doi 10.1080/02702710802411604
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetaMetrics. (2012). Linking the K-PREP reading with the Lexile Framework: A study to link the Kentucky performance rating for educational progress reading with the Lexile framework for reading. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics. Retrieved from http://education.ky.gov/aa/kts/documents/k-prepquantilelinkingstudy11-2012%20v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MetaMetrics. (2016). The Lexile Analyzer. Retrieved from https://www.lexile.com/analyzer/
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). Reading assessment. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2017/#districts/scores?grade=4
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D. (2011). Engaging struggling adolescent readers through situational interest: A model proposing the relationships among extrinsic motivation, oral reading fluency, comprehension, and academic achievement. Reading Psychology, 32, 395–425. doi 10.1080/02702711.495633
   Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Magpuri-Lavell, T., Rasinski, T. V., & Rupley, W. H. (2015). Fluency differences by text genre in proficient and struggling secondary students. Advances in Literary Study, 3, 102–117. Retrieved online at http://file.scirp.org/pdf/ALS_2015101315370039.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2012). Is fluent, expressive reading important for high school readers? Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, 56, 67–76. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., Magpuri-Lavell, T., & Smith, G. S. (2014). Interpreting the relationships among prosody, automaticity, accuracy, and silent reading comprehension in secondary students. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 123–156. doi: 10.1177/1086296X14535170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. (2009). The development of children's reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 32–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1988). Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In M. Daneman, G. E., Mackinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 109–143). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoevfen, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Paige, D. D., Rains, C., Stewart, F., Julovich, B., Prenkert, D., … Nichols, W. D. (2017). Effects of intensive fluency instruction on the reading proficiency of third-grade struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33, 519–532. doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1250144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 350–361. doi: 10.80/19388070802468715
   Google Scholar
• Read, C. (1971). Preschool children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H. (2009). Introduction to direct/explicit instruction in reading for the struggling reader: Phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency vocabulary, and comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802690189
   Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H., Willson, V., & Logan, J. W. (1995, April). Contributions of phonemic knowledge, prior knowledge, and listening comprehension to elementary-age children's reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563–566. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.42.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Schatschneider, C., Buck, J., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Hassler, L., & Hecht, S. (2004).et al. A multivariate study of factors that contribute to individual differences in performance on the Florida Comprehensive Reading Assessment Test (Technical Report No. 5). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, P. A. (1991). Understanding prosody's role in reading acquisition. Theory Into Practice, 30, 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing fluency in the context of effective literacy instruction. In T. Blachowicz & K. Lems (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 21–38). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 91–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, C. T., Petscher, Y., & Catts, H. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of direct and indirect links between reading skills in kindergarten and reading comprehension in tenth grade. Reading and Writing, 31, 133–153. doi: 10.1007/s11134-017-9777-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturman, L. (2003). Teaching to the test: Science or intuition? Educational Researcher, 45, 261–273. doi: 10.1080.0013188032000137256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton, S., & Bear, D. R. (1992). Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2014). Test of word reading efficiency (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Trainin, G., Hayden, H. E., Wilson, K., & Erickson, J. (2016). Examining the impact of QuickReads’ technology and print formats on fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary development for elementary students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 93–116. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2016.1164778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Annual survey of school system finances: Summary of public elementary-secondary finances by state: Fiscal year 2014. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=SSF_2014_00A01&prodType=table
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., & Buly, M. R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers really need. The Reading Teacher, 57, 520–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293–301. doi:10.1002/acp.1417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, V. L., & Rupley, W. H. (1997). A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic, and strategy knowledge. Journal for the Scientific Study of Reading, 1, 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zutell, J. (1992). An integrated view of word knowledge: Correlational studies of the relationships among spelling, reading, and conceptual development. In S. Templeton & D. R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 213–230). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar