The bright and dark side of writing motivation: Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance

References

• Abbuhl, R. (2011). Using models in writing instruction: A comparison with native and nonnative speakers of English. SAGE Open, 1(3), 1–12. doi:10.1177/2158244011426295
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Pscyhological Review, 84(2), 191–125. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Eds.). (pp. 307–337). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Benware, C., & Deci, E. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755–765. doi:10.3102/00028312021004755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwer, R., Koster, M., & Van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of a strategy-focused instructional program on the writing quality of upper elementary students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. doi:10.1037/edu0000206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. doi:10.1037/a0029692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25–37. doi:10.1207/S15326985ep3501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, R., & Kauffman, D. (2016). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 160–173). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, M. (1991). Affect and cognition in the writing processes of eleventh graders: A study of concentration and Motivation. Written Communication, 8(4), 473–508. doi:10.1177/0741088391008004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Bernardi, B., & Antolini, E. (2007). Fostering students'willingness and interest in argumentative writing: An intervention study. In S. Hidi & P. Boscolo (Eds.), Writing and Motivation (pp. 183–202). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students' recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1006–1021. doi:10.1037/a0027800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, F., Merchie, E., Barendse, M., Rosseel, Y., De Naeghel, J., & Van Keer, H. (2018). Cognitive and motivational challenges in writing: Studying the relationship with writing performance across students' gender and achievement level. Reading Research Quarterly , 53(2), 249–272. doi:10.1002/rrq.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2018). Fostering writing in upper primary grades: A study into the distinct and combined impact of explicit instruction and peer assistance. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 325–354. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9787-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2016). Student, teacher and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary school children's writing performance. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 833–868. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, J., Lynch, A., Laughlin, J., Smith, E., & Prinz, R. (2001). Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods and preliminary results form the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(1), 38–47. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00272-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemish Ministry of Education and Training. (2008). Education in Flanders. The Flemish educational landscape in a nutshell. Retrieved from http://www.scholenbanden.be/files/onderwijsinvlaanderennotendopen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. doi:10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2018). A writer(s) withing community model of writing. In C. Bazerman, V. Berninger, D. Brandt, S. Graham, J. Langer, S. Murphy, P. Matsuda, D. Rowe, & M. Schleppegrell (Eds.), The lifespan development of writing (pp. 271–325). Urbana, IL: National Council of English.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 516–536. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning-disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 353–361. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Chambers, A. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction: A review of reviews. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 211–226). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207–241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Troia, G. (2000). Self-regulated strategy development revisited: Teaching writing strategies to struggling writers. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 879–896. doi:10.1037/A0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Ratelle, C., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233–240. doi:10.1037/a0012758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(3), 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., & Van den Berghe, L. (2016). Toward a systematic study of the dark side of student motivation: Antecedents and consequences of teachers' controlling behaviors. In W. Liu, J. Wang, & R. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learners: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 59–81). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340. doi:10.3102/00028312043002295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 144–157). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. (2002). A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 88–102. doi:10.2307/1511276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299–324. doi:10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A., Stanek, L., & Ryan, R. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68–84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. (2013). Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 328–341. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J., & Miller, S. (1999). Changes in elementary school children's achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 207–229. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_2
   Google Scholar
• Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2016). Stimulating graphical summarization in late elementary education: The relationship between two instructional mind map approaches and student characteristics. Elementary School Journal, 116(3), 487–522. doi:10.1086/684939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–48. doi:10.3102/0034654307313793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 139–158. doi:10.1080/10573560390143085
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353–360. doi:10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, K. (2009). Integrating the 6+1 writing traits model with cross-age tutoring: An investigation of elementary students' writing development. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(1), 28–38. doi:10.1080/19388070802226261
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, L., Fortier, M., Vallerand, R., & Briere, N. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. doi:10.1023/A:1014805132406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN Version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling. University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000a). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319–338. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellings, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Metacognition Learning, 6(2), 83–90. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, S., Fortier, M., Strachan, S., & Blanchard, C. (2012). Testing and integrating Self-Determination Theory and Self-Efficacy Theory in a physical activity context. Canadian Psychology, 53(4), 319–327. doi:10.1037/a0030280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G., Harbaugh, A., Shankland, R., Wolbers, K., & Lawrence, A. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 17–44. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R., Fortier, M., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents' academic achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control amon Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468–483. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., Swanson, E., Boardman, A., Roberts, R., Mohammed, S., & Stillman-Spisak, S. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middel school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938–964. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C., Denton, C., York, M., & Francis, D. (2014). Adolescents' motivation for reading: Group differences and relation to standardized achievement. Reading and Writing, 27(3), 503–533. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9454-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 261–282. doi:10.1348/000709901158514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writers: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar