References
- Attard, C. (2015). Introducing iPads into primary mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ experiences and pedagogies. In M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, K. Mavrou, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education (pp. 193–213). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2013). How might multi-touch technology be a powerful aid for preschoolers’ development of numerical abilities? In Avances en Ciencias de la Educación y d el Desarrollo (pp. 520–525). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259146746_How_might_multi-touch_technology_be_a_powerful_aid_for_preschoolers’_development_of_numerical_abilities.
- Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Maracci, M. (2015). Multi-touch technology and preschoolers’ development of number-sense. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-015-0002-4
- Bailey, D. H., Duncan, G. J., Watts, T., Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2018). Risky business: Correlation and causation in longitudinal studies of skill development. American Psychologist, 73(1), 81–94.
- Barendregt, W., Lindström, B., Rietz-Leppänen, E., Holgersson, I., & Ottosson, T. (2012). Development and evaluation of Fingu: A mathematics iPad game using multi-touch interaction. In H. Schelhowe (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 204–207). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307126
- Baroody, A. J., Lai, M. L., & Mix, K. S. (2006). The development of young children’s early number and operation sense and its implications for early childhood education. In Handbook of research on the education of young children (2nd ed., pp. 187–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Beckwith, M., & Restle, F. (1966). Process of enumeration. Psychological Review, 73(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023650
- Brownell, W. A. (1928). The development of children’s number ideas in the primary grades. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London, UK: Macmillan. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/91059/.
- Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00374.x
- Byers, P., & Hadley, J. (2013). Traditional and novel modes of activity in touch screen math apps. In J. P. Hourcade, N. Sawhney, & E. Reardon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. New York, NY: ACM.
- Chi, M. T. H., & Klahr, D. (1975). Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19(3), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(75)90072-7
- Clements, D. H. (1999). Subitizing: What is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(7), 400–405.
- Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (Second edition). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Ester, E. F., Drew, T., Klee, D., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2012). Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(21), 7169–7177. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1218-12.2012
- Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.006
- Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Noël, M.-P. (2008). Does finger training increase young children’s numerical performance? Cortex, 44(4), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.020
- Highfield, K., & Goodwin, K. (2013). Apps for mathematics learning: A review of “educational” apps from the iTunes App Store. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow (pp. 378–385). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
- Holgersson, I., Barendregt, W., Emanuelsson, J., Ottosson, T., Rietz, E., & Lindström, B. (2016). Fingu—A game to support children’s development of arithmetic competence: Theory, design and empirical research. In P. S. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 123–145). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_6
- Holgersson, I., Barendregt, W., Rietz, E., Ottosson, T., & Lindström, B. (2016). Can children enhance their arithmetic competence by playing a specially designed computer game? Cursiv, 18, 177–188.
- Howell, S. C., & Kemp, C. R. (2010). Assessing preschool number sense: Skills demonstrated by children prior to school entry. Educational Psychology, 30(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443411003695410
- Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 498–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418556
- Kirby, K. D. D. (2013). The development of an idealized number line: Differentiating physical inscription from mathematical object. Presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Krajcsi, A., Szabó, E., & Mórocz, I. Á. (2013). Subitizing is sensitive to the arrangement of objects. Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000191
- Larkin, K. (2015). “An app! An app! My kingdom for an app”: An 18-month quest to determine whether apps support mathematical knowledge building. In T. Lowrie & R. J. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning (pp. 251–276). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9517-3_13.
- Lassaline, M. E., & Logan, G. D. (1993). Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.561.
- Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E. M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 130–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002.
- Livesey, D., Coleman, R., & Piek, J. (2007). Performance on the movement assessment battery for children by Australian 3- to 5-year-old children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(6), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00733.x.
- Luo, Z., Jose, P. E., Huntsinger, C. S., & Pigott, T. D. (2007). Fine motor skills and mathematics achievement in East Asian American and European American kindergartners and first graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X185329
- MacDonald, B. L., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2016). Seven types of subitizing activity characterizing young children’s mental activity. In S. Marx (Ed.), Qualitative research in STEM (pp. 256–286). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.1.1
- Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Shumway, J. F., Bullock, E., Tucker, S. I., Anderson-Pence, K. L., Westenskow, A., … Jordan, K. (2015). Young children’s learning performance and efficiency when using virtual manipulative mathematics iPad apps. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(1), 41–69.
- Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. S., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560.
- Noël, M.-P. (2005). Finger gnosia: a predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child Neuropsychology, 11(5), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040590951550
- Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.324
- Penner-Wilger, M., Fast, L., LaFevre, J.-A., Smith-Chant, B. L., Skwarchuck, S.-L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. (2007). The foundations of numeracy: Subitizing, finger gnosia, and fine motor ability. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1385–1390). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8vb45554.
- Piazza, M., Giacomini, E., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270(1521), 1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2356
- Potter, M. C., & Levy, E. I. (1968). Spatial enumeration without counting. Child Development, 39(1), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127377
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Riconscente, M. M. (2013). Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game Motion Math. Games and Culture, 8(4), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013496894
- Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Schacter, J., Shih, J., Allen, C. M., DeVaul, L., Adkins, A. B., Ito, T., & Jo, B. (2016). Math shelf: A randomized trial of a prekindergarten tablet number sense curriculum. Early Education and Development, 27(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1057462
- Sedig, K., & Liang, H.-N. (2006). Interactivity of visual mathematical representations: Factors affecting learning and cognitive processes. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 179–212.
- Segal, A., Tversky, B., & Black, J. (2014). Conceptually congruent actions can promote thought. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.06.004
- Sinclair, N., Chorney, S., & Rodney, S. (2016). Rhythm in number: Exploring the affective, social and mathematical dimensions of using TouchCounts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0154-y
- Sinclair, N., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2014). Learning number with TouchCounts: The role of emotions and the body in mathematical communication. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9212-x
- Sinclair, N., & Pimm, D. (2015). Mathematics using multiple senses: Developing finger gnosis with three- and four-year-olds in an era of multi-touch technologies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 9(3), 99–109.
- Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and applied multilevel analysis. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Son, S.-H., & Meisels, S. J. (2006). The relationship of young children’s motor skills to later school achievement. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(4), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0033
- Sophian, C., & McCorgray, P. (1994). Part-whole knowledge and early arithmetic problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 12(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1201_1
- Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. G. (1995). The development of subitizing in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00688.x
- Steffe, L., & Cobb, P. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York, Ny: Springer Verlag.
- Suggate, S., Stoeger, H., & Fischer, U. (2017). Finger-based numerical skills link fine motor skills to numerical development in preschoolers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(6), 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512517727405
- Svenson, O., & Sjöberg, K. (1978). Subitizing and counting processes in young children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00327.x
- Svenson, O., & Sjöberg, K. (1983). Speeds of subitizing and counting processes in different age groups. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1983.10533512
- Tucker, S. I. (2016). The modification of attributes, affordances, abilities, and distance for learning framework and its applications to interactions with mathematics virtual manipulatives. In P. S. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives (pp. 41–69). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_3
- Tucker, S. I., & Johnson, T. N. (2017). I thought this was a study on math games: Attribute modification in children’s interactions with mathematics apps. Education Sciences, 7(2), 50. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020050
- Tucker, S. I., Lommatsch, C. W., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Anderson-Pence, K. L., & Symanzik, J. (2017). Kindergarten children’s interactions with touchscreen mathematics virtual manipulatives: An innovative mixed methods analysis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.328097
- Tucker, S. I., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Shumway, J. F., & Jordan, K. E. (2016). Zooming in on students’ thinking: How a number line app revealed, concealed, and developed students’ number understanding. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(1), 23–28.
- Tucker, S. I., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Westenskow, A., & Jordan, K. E. (2016). The complexity of the affordance-ability relationship when second-grade children interact with mathematics virtual manipulative apps. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9276-x
- Wasner, M., Nuerk, H.-C., Martignon, L., Roesch, S., & Moeller, K. (2016). Finger gnosis predicts a unique but small part of variance in initial arithmetic performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.006
- Wolters, G., van Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G.-J. (1987). Quantification of small numbers of dots: Subitizing or pattern recognition? The American Journal of Psychology, 100(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422405
- Wright, R. J., Stanger, G., Cowper, M., & Dyson, R. (1996). First-graders’ progress in an experimental mathematics recovery program. In J. Mulligan & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Children’s number learning: A research monograph of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 55–72). Adelaide, Australia: AAMT.
- Zhang, M., Trussell, R. P., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. R. (2015). Using math apps for improving student learning: An exploratory study in an inclusive fourth grade classroom. TechTrends, 59(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0837-y