646
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Longitudinal literacy professional development in an urban elementary charter school

, , , , &
Pages 447-462 | Received 25 May 2018, Accepted 17 Nov 2018, Published online: 17 Feb 2019

References

  • Allington, R. L., & Johnston, P. (2002). Reading to learn: Lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Amendum, S. J. (2014). Embedded professional development and classroom-based early reading intervention: Early diagnostic reading intervention through coaching. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 30(4), 348–377.
  • Anders, P., Hoffman, J., & Duffy, G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 719–742). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Au, K. (2005) Negotiating the slippery slope: School change and literacy achievement. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 267–286. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3703_1.
  • Bartholomew, S. S., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Competing views of teaching in a school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 155–165.
  • Beach, D., McAdams, L., Becker, M., Gentry, J., Larmer, B., & Miller, J. (2015). Public school-university partnerships: A model for effective professional development. In S. D. Garrett, & K. Fleming (Eds.), Education: Issues & answers (pp. 1–12). Corpus Christi, TX: Texas A&M University.
  • Bean, R. M., & Morewood, A. L. (2011). Best practices in professional development for improving literacy instruction in schools. In L. M. Morrow, & L. B. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices for literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 455–478). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary development. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34.
  • Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Obrochta, C., & Fogelberg, E. (2005). Literacy coaching for change. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 55–58.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:10.3102/00131809X018001032
  • Buttram, J. L., & Farley-Ripple, E. N. (2016). The role of principals in professional learning communities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 192–220.
  • Cantrell, S. C., & Hughes, H. K. (2008). Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of an extended professional development with coaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 95–127. doi:10.1080/10862960802070442
  • Carlisle, J. F., & Berebitsky, D. (2011). Literacy coaching as a component of professional development. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 773–800.
  • Carruthers, C. K. (2012). New schools, new students, new teachers: Evaluating the effectiveness of charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 280–292.
  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. doi:10.3102/00131899
  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2011). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (Eds.). (1996). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81–92.
  • Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
  • Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102.0013189X08331140
  • Desimone, L. M., & Long, D. (2010). Teacher effects and the achievement gap: Do teacher and teacher quality influence the achievement gap between black and white and high- and low-SES students in the early grades? Teachers College Record, 112, 3024–3073.
  • Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaches as effective professional development. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081
  • Desimone, L., Smith, T. M., & Phillips, K. J. R. (2013). Linking student achievement growth to professional development participation and changes in instruction: A longitudinal study elementary teachers and students in Title I schools. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–46.
  • Dillon, D., O’Brien, D., Sato, M., & Kelly, C. (2011). Professional development and teacher education for reading. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol IV, pp. 629–660). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Duffy, G. G. (2004). Teachers who improve reading achievement: What research says about what they do and how to develop them. In D. Strickland, & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Improving reading achievement through professional development (pp. 3–22). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
  • Duffy, G. G. (2014). Explaining reading: A resource for explicit teaching. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1994). Teacher book clubs: Establishing literature discussion groups for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 47, 574–576.
  • Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for sustaining research-based practice in the schools: A case study. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 1–14.
  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Cassell.
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College.
  • Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Jayanthi, M., Kim, J. S., & Santoro, L. E. (2010). Teacher study group: Impact of the professional development model. On Reading Instruction and Student Outcomes in First Grade Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 694–739.
  • Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational research design (pp. 17–51). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84–117.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Heilig, J. V., & Jez, S. J. (2010). Teach For America: A review of the evidence. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/teach-for-america
  • Hill, H. C. (2007). Learning in the teaching workforce. The Future of Children, 17(1), 111–127.
  • Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.
  • Hunt, C. S., & Handsfield, L. J. (2013). The emotional landscapes of literacy coaching: Issues of identity, power, and positioning. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 47–86. doi:10.1177/1086296X12469969
  • Invernizzi, M., Swank, L., & Juel, C. (2007). PALS-K: Phonological awareness literacy screening-kindergarten (6th ed.). Charlottesville: University Printing Services.
  • Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2007). A formative experiment investigating literacy engagement among adolescent Latina/o students just beginning to read, write, and speak English. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 512–545. doi:10.1958/RRQ.42.4.4
  • Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, mathematics and engineering. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
  • Kooy, M. (2006). The telling stories of novice teachers: Constructing teacher knowledge in book clubs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 661–674. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.010
  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
  • Lave, J. (2012). Everyday life and learning. Bernard Moses memorial lecture. The graduate council lectures, University of California, Berkeley. University of California Television. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAYs46icCFs
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Le Cornu, R., & Peters, J. (2009). Sustaining school-university collaboration for reciprocal learning. The International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 231–246.
  • Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. S. (2010). Qualitative reading inventory–5. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–40.
  • McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Rathbun, A., …Bullock Mann, F. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018–144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. asp?pubid = 2018144
  • Ni, Y. (2012). Teacher working conditions in charter schools and traditional public schools: A comparative study. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–26.
  • Ni, Y. (2017). Teacher working conditions, teacher commitment, and charter schools. Teachers College Record, 119, 1–38.
  • Nougaret, A., Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2004). The effects of teacher licensure on teachers’ pedagogical competence: Implications for elementary and secondary teachers of students with learning and behavior disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 17, 301–318.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13, 48–63.
  • Overholt, R., & Szabocsik, S. (2013). Leadership content knowledge for literacy: Connecting literacy teachers and their principals. The Clearing House, 86(2), 53–58. doi:10.1080/00098655.2012.742034
  • Parsons, S. A. (2008). Providing all students ACCESS to self-regulated literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 61, 628–635. doi:10.1598/RT.61.8.4
  • Parsons, S. A., Parsons, A. W., Nuland, L. R., Dodman, S. L., & Scales, W. D. (2014). Year one of a longitudinal literacy professional development initiative in an urban school. Journal of School Connections, 5, 29–57.
  • Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344.
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. doi:10.3102/0013189X11421826
  • Porche, M. V., Pallante, D. H., & Snow, C. E. (2012). Professional development for reading achievement: Results from the Collaborative Language and Literacy Instruction Program (CLLIP). Elementary School Journal, 112(4), 649–671.
  • Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., … Woo, D. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(1), 35–58. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_2
  • Pressley, M., & Allington, R. L. (Eds.). (2015). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (4th ed., pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N., & Stouffer, J. (2016). Teaching literacy: Reading. In D. H. Gitomer, & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1217-1267). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
  • Raphael, T. E. (2010). Defying gravity: Literacy reform in urban schools. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 59, 22–42.
  • Raphael, T. E., Au, K. H., & Goldman, S. R. (2009). Whole school instructional improvement through the standards-based change process: A developmental model. In J. Hoffman, & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Changing literacies for changing times (pp. 198–229). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Raphael, T. E., Vasquez, J. M., Fortune, A. J., Gavelek, J. R., & Au, K. H. (2014). Sociocultural approaches to professional development: Supporting sustainable school change. In L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche, & K. L. Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development: Successful models and practices, preK-12 (pp. 145–173). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). Formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Roch, C. H., & Sai, N. (2018). Stay or go? Turnover in CMO, EMO, and regular charter schools. The Social Science Journal, 55(3), 232–244.
  • Rooks, D., & Muñoz, C. B. (2015). Brilliant, bored, or badly-behaved? Media coverage of the charter school debate in the United States. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–48.
  • Sailors, M., & Price, L. R. (2010). Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 301–322.
  • Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Snow, C. E. & Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.), (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Steeg, S. M., & Lambson, D. (2015). Collaborative professional development: One school’s story. The Reading Teacher, 68(6), 473–478. doi:10.1002/trtr.1338
  • Stillman, J. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113, 133–180.
  • Stoll, L. (2010). Connecting learning communities: Capacity building for systemic change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 469–484). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Stover, K., Kissel, B., Haag, K., & Shoniker, R. (2011). Differentiated coaching: Fostering reflection with teachers. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 498–509. doi:10.1598/RT64.7.3
  • Stuit, D. A., & Smith, T. M. (2012). Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 268–279.
  • Takahashi, S. (2011). Co-constructing efficacy: A “communities of practice” perspective on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 732–741. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.002
  • Taylor, B. M., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.). (2002). Teaching reading: Effective schools, accomplished teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28. [InsertedFromOnline]
  • Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2005). The CEIRA school change framework: An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 40–69. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.1.3
  • Taylor, B. M., Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. H. (2011). Reading and school reform. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & Afflerbach, P. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 594–628). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Thomas, C. N., Hassaram, B., Rieth, H. J., Raghavan, N. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Mulloy, A. M. (2012). The integrated curriculum project: Teacher change and student outcomes within a university-school professional development collaboration. Psychology in the Schools, 9(5), 444–464.
  • Vergari, S. (2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21(1), 15–39. doi:10.1177/0895904806296508
  • Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2004). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Walpole, S., McKenna, M. C., Uribe-Zarain, X., & Lamitina, D. (2010). The relationships between coaching and instruction in the primary grades: Evidence from high-poverty schools. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 115–140.
  • Walsh, M. E., & Backe, S. (2013). School-university partnerships: Reflections and opportunities. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(5), 594–607. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2013.835158
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, K. M. (2016). Professional development that promotes powerful interactions: Using teacher book clubs to reflect on quality in teacher-child relationships. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 44(3), 28–34.
  • Yoon, K., Duncan, T., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement: Issues and answers report, REL 2007- No. 033. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.