The (non)effect of Joint Construction in a genre-based approach to teaching writing

References

• Adams, A. M., & Simmons, F. (2018). Exploring individual and gender differences in early writing performance. Reading and Writing, 1–29. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9859-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, A. M., Simmons, F., & Willis, C. (2015). Exploring relationships between working memory and writing: Individual differences associated with gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, H. (2012). Teaching writing skills based on a genre approach to L2 primary school students: An action research. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80(2), 606–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. C., & Otto, S. (1993). Granen [The fir tree]. Bromma: Opal.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class and pedagogies: Visible and invisible. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, L., & Adams, A. M. (2011). Is it differences in language skills and working memory that account for girls being better at writing than boys? Journal of Writing Research, 3(3), 249–277.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1987). Life as Narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing: A genre based approach. Sydney: NSW Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. A., & Farling, M. (2017). A dozen heads are better than one: Collaborative writing in genre-based pedagogy. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 564–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstens, A. (2009). The effectiveness of genre-based approaches in teaching academic writing: Subject specific versus cross-disciplinary emphases (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Carstens, A. (2011). Generic versus discipline-specific writing interventions: Report on a quasi-experiment. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 29(2), 149–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., & Su, S.-W. (2012). A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal, 66(2), 184–192. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccr061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F. (1984). Varieties of written discourse. In F. Christie & Course Team (Eds.), Children writing: Study guide (pp. 11–52). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. C., & Lan, S.-W. (2014). Writing science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English language learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S., Macnaught, L., & Humphrey, S. (2011). Understanding joint construction in the tertiary context. Linguistics and Human Sciences, 4(2), 135–160.
   Google Scholar
• Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional lingusitic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(2), 155–182. doi: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation. In G. R. Hankock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Friberger, A., & Harris, M. (2007). Prinsessan på ärten [The princess and the pea]. Stockholm: Bonnier Carlsen.
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 410–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Kirkwood, H. J., Elliott, J. G., Holmes, J., & Hilton, K. A. (2008). Attentional and executive function behaviours in children with poor working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillam, S. L., Gillam, R. B., Fargo, J. D., Olszewski, A., & Segura, H. (2017). Monitoring indicators of scholarly language. A progress-monitoring instrument for measuring narrative discourse skills. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(2), 96–106. doi: 10.1177/1525740116651442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn-Applegate, K., Breit-Smith, A., Justice, L., & Piasta, S. (2010). Artfulness in young children’s spoken narratives. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 468–493. doi: 10.1080/10409280903440620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. (2010). Teaching functional grammar in primary school. In M. Olofsson (Ed.), Symposium 2009. Genrer och funktionellt språk i teori och praktik [Symposium 2009. Genres and functional language in theory and practice] (pp. 38–51). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg, F. (2006). Genreskrivning under senare skolår: att berätta räcker inte [Genre writing in the later school years: Telling stories is not enough]. In L. Bjar (Ed.), Det hänger på språket [It’s all about the language] (pp. 295–316). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson-Drysdale, T. (2013). Teaching writing informed by systemic functional linguistics: “I never would have thought of doing that…” (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3677
   Google Scholar
• Hoogeveen, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2015). Effects of peer response using genre knowledge on writing quality: A randomized control trial. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 265–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L. (2011). Revisiting joint construction in the tertiary context. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 34(1), 98–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, I. F. (2015). Making text features salient to graduate student writers (Doctoral dissertation). Washington: Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220–245.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B., & Sandell Ring, A. (2012). Låt språket bära: Genrepedagogik i praktiken [Let language carry us: genre pedagogy in practice]. Stockholm: Hallgren & Fallgren.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., & Myhill, D. (2007). Discourses of difference? Examining gender differences in linguistic characteristics of writing. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de L'éducation, 30(2), 456–482.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, L. M., Bowles, R. P., Kaderavek, J. N., Ukrainetz, T. A., Eisenberg, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2006). The index of narrative microstructure: A clinical tool for analyzing school-age children’s narrative performances. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 177–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, C., Smit, J., de Wachter, L., & Elen, J. (2017). Scaffolding tertiary students’ writing in a genre-based writing intervention. Journal of Writing Research, 9(1), 27–59. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2017.09.01.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyumcu, E. (2013a). Genrebaserad undervisning som pedagogiskt utvecklingsarbete [Genre-based teaching as pedagogical development work] In Skolportens numrerade artikelserie för utvecklingsarbete i skolan [In the Skolport’s numbered article series for development work in schools] (vol. 3, pp. 1–23). Nacka, Sweden: Skolporten Forskning & Utveckling.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyumcu, E. (2013b). Genrepedagogik som verktyg i språk- och kunskapsutvecklande undervisning och lärande [Genre pedagogy as a tool in the teaching and learning of language and curricular knowledge]. In K. Hyltenstam & I. Lindberg (Eds.), Svenska som andraspråk—i forskning, undervisning och samhälle [In Swedish as a second language—In research, teaching and society] (pp. 605–63). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, D. M., & Beverly, B. L. (2012). School-age language and classroom success. In C. McCormick Richburg & D. Fisher Smiley. School-based audiology (pp. 33–54). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (1996). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & A. G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 308–338). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaught, L. (2015). Classroom talk and the negotiation of academic English: A linguistic analysis of collaborative text creation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London & Oakville: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2013). Pedagogic discourse. Contexts of schooling. Rask: internationalt Tidsskrift for Sprog og Kommunikation, 38, 219–264.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe tasks”: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hallaron, C. L. (2014). Supporting elementary English language learners’ argumentative writing through a functional grammar approach (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, B. M. (2014). Scaffolding science: A pedagogy for marginalised students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B., Gillam, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Emerging procedures in narrative assessment: The index of narrative complexity. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, D. B., Gillam, S. L., Spencer, T., & Gillam, R. B. (2010). The effects of literate narrative intervention on children with neurologically based language impairments: An early stage study. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 53(4), 961–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, K. (2017). Språk- och kunskapsutvecklande undervisning F–3: cirkelmodellen, genrepedagogik, ASL och IKT [Language- and knowledge enhancing education F-3: The teaching and learning cycle, genre pedagogy, ASL and ICT]. Stockholm: Hallgren & Fallgren.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, K. A. (2012). Teaching persuasive argument essay writing to adolescent English language learners through the Reading to Learn approach (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2013). Intervening in contexts of schooling. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Discourse in context: Contemporary applied linguistics (vol. 3, pp. 447–475). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J. (1994). Exploring literacy in school English [Write it Right resources for literacy and learning]. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
   Google Scholar
• Sellgren, M. (2011). Den dubbla uppgiften: Tvåspråkiga elever i skolans mellanår arbetar med förklarande genre i SO [The double task: Bilingual students in upper primary school working with the explanative genre in the Social Sciences] (Licentiate Thesis). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Södergren, M. (2016). Skrivcirkeln: Genrepedagogik utifrån cirkelmodellen och läsförståelsestrategier. Metodbok [The writing circle: Genre pedagogy from the perspective of the teaching and learning cycle and reading comprehension strategies]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Staal, L. (2000). The Story Face: An adaptation of story mapping that incorporates visualization and discovery learning to enhance reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, N., & Glenn, C. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Strömquist, S. (2014). Skrivboken: skrivprocess, skrivråd och skrivstrategier [The writing book: writing process, writing advice and writing strategies]. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). Läroplan och kursplaner för grundskolan. [Curriculum and syllabi for the compulsory school system]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2017). Retrieved fromhttps://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/sok-statistik-om-forskola-skola-och-vuxenutbildning.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2018). Läslyftet i skolan [The literacy boost in school]. Retrieved from https://larportalen.skolverket.se/#/moduler/5-las-skriv/F%C3%B6rskola/alla.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M. (2011). The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walt Disney Company. (2004). Den fula ankungen [The ugly duckling]. Malmö: Richter.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. (2013). A study of genre approach in EFL writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2128–2135.
   Google Scholar
• Westby, C. (2015). Monitoring indicators of scholarly language. Word of Mouth, 26(3), 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. (2010). Teaching language across a teaching and learning cycle using a curriculum cycle. In M. Olofsson (Ed.), Symposium 2009. Genrer och funktionellt språk i teori och praktik [Symposium 2009. Genres and functional language in theory and practice] (pp. 52–78). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. J., & Larkin, R. F. (2013). Narrative writing, reading and cognitive processes in middle childhood: What are the links? Learning and Individual Differences, 28(C), 142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar