Collaborative learning with scientific approach and multiple intelligence: Its impact toward math learning achievement

References

• Abdulkarim, R., & Jadiry, A. A. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning group division based on multiple intelligences theory and previous achievement on scientific thinking skills development of ninth grade students in Oman. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(4), 553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2014). Sustaining young people’s enrolment intentions in relation to physics: Development and validation of a tool. Australian Journal of Educational & Development Psychology, 14, 93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (3rd ed). ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Atsnan, M. F., & Gazali, R. Y. (2013). Penerapan Pendekatan Scientific Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas VII Materi Bilangan (Pecahan). Jurnal Pendidikan, I(I), 978–979.
   Google Scholar
• Azlina, N. A. N. (2010). CETLs: Supporting collaborative activities among students and teachers through the use of think-pair-share techniques. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 7(5), 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bele, C. D., & Bidarkar, S. N. (2014). Existence of mathematics in personality development. In R. Nitonde & V. Nandapurkar (Eds.), Soft skills and personality development (pp. 33–35). Shri Shivaji College, Parbhani.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, F. (2011). Managing science: Innovation, technology, and knowledge management. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Tomlinson, D. (1979). How to: Improve lecturing. Medical Teacher, 1(3), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421597909023826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon, P. (2003). Teaching large groups. BMJ, 326(7386), 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7386.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, T. A., Mark, D. D., & Mark D’Antonio, J. (2011). Students' preferences for cooperative learning instructional approaches considerations for college teachers. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 21(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Conțu, E. G. (2017). The role of classical and modern teaching methods in business education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 11(1), 276–283.
   Google Scholar
• Daud, K. A. M., Khidzir, N. Z., Ismail, A. R., & Abdullah, F. A. (2018). Validity and reliability of instrument to measure social media skills among small and medium entrepreneurs at Pangkalan Datu River. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(3), 1026–1037.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, Y., & Soybaş, D. (2011). Preservice mathematics teachers’ experiences about function and equation concepts. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75183
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenb (Ed.), Collaborative learning (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Egodawatte, G. (2012). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in algebra. [University of Toronto]Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1–1715. http://login.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1267036337?accountid=14816%5Cnhttp://sfx.library.vanderbilt.edu/vu?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, F., Behnam, B., & Esmaeili, K. (2014). A study of relationship between multiple intelligences and writing ability of Iranian female and male students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 2663–2670. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p2663
   Google Scholar
• Fahimah, S. (2013). Improving Students' Speaking Ability Through Three Step Interview Technique. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran (JP3). 1(12), 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fong-Yee, D., & Normore, A. H. (2017). The impact of quality teaching on student achievement. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 7(4), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v7i4.2717
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176460 https://doi.org/10.2307/1176460
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, J. M. (1994). Is this collaboration? In K. Bosworth & S. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Collaborative learning: Underlying processes and effective techniques (pp. 5–14). Jossey-Bass Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazali, D. (2008). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Dalam Kajian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jurnal Institut Perguruan Islam.
   Google Scholar
• Hafidhah, T. S., Mardiyana, & Usodo, B. (2016). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together (NHT) dan Pairs Check (PC) Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Materi Fungsi Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(1), 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at The Building Teacher Quality: What Does the Research Tell us ACER Research Conference. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Teachers Make a Difference, What Is the Research Evidence? Distinguishing Expert Teachers from Novice and Experienced Teachers. http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003
   Google Scholar
• Held, S., & McKimm, J. (2009). Improve your lecturing. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 70(8), 466–469. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2009.70.8.43541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerr, T. R. (2000). Becoming a multiple intelligences school. The Associaton for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C. R., Vore, J. B., De, Denny, G. S., Smith, R. M., & Capps, M. (2007). Learning preferences of 5th and 6th grade students in Northwest Arkansas. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 2(2), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. (2006). Making the connection: Utilising multiple intelligences to measure teaching and learning success in mathematics. University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Jasmine, J. (2007). Mengajar Dengan Metode Kecerdasan Majemuk: Implementasi multiple intelligences. Nuansa.
   Google Scholar
• Jayantika, I. G. A. N. T., Ardana, I. M., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2013). Kontribusi Bakat Numerik, Kecerdasan Spasial, Dan Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SD Negeri Di Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Ganesha, 2(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. (2012). The external and internal education factors that contribute to student achievement and self-perceptions of urban middle school Title I students. Rowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning: The structural approach. Kagan.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1998). Multiple intelligences: The complete MI book. Kagan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kok Seng, L. (2017). An error analysis of form 2 (grade 7) students in simplifying algebraic expressions: A descriptive study. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 8(20), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i20.1398
   Google Scholar
• Kruea-In, N., & Thongperm, O. (2014). Teaching of science process skills in Thai contexts: Status, supports, and obstacles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1324–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.228
   Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Law, Q. P. S., Chung, J. W. Y., & Leung, L. C. C. (2017). Perceptions of collaborative learning in enhancing undergraduate education students’ engagement in teaching and learning English. US-China Education Review A, 7(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2017.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T. (2002). Implementing cooperative learning in EFL teaching: Process and effects. National Taiwan Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• Longman. (2014). Longman dictionary online. Retrieved October 23, 2014, from http://global.longmandictionariesw.com/
   Google Scholar
• Mamhot, M. R., Havranek, T. L., & Mamhot, A. A. (2014). Teaching mathematics through verbal linguistic intelligence. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 02(01), 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• McLelland, C. V. (2006). The nature of science and the scientific method. Retrived April 8, 2006, from http://www.geosociety.org/educate/NatureOfScience.htm
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, G. R. (2001). Teaching and learning the scientific method. The American Biology Teacher, 63(4), 242–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & Lyman, F. T. (1988). In the classroom: The promise of theory-embedded tools. Educational Leadership, 5(6), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Meiers, M., & Trevitt, J. (2010). The digest: Language in the mathematics classroom. The NSW Institut of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1
   Google Scholar
• Setyawarno, D. (2018). Panduan praktikum teori respon butir: Analisis butir dengan pendekatan klasik dan modern. Universitas negeri yogykarta.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N., & Lewis, C. M. (2019). Amplifying and attenuating inequity in collaborative learning: Toward an analytical framework. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1631825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinner, A. (2003). Scientific method, imagination, and the teaching of physics. La Physique au Canada, 59(6), 335–346.
   Google Scholar
• Suhendri, H. (2012). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Matematis-Logis, Rasa Percaya Diri, Dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, pp. 978–979.
   Google Scholar
• Susantini, E., Faizah, U., Prastiwi, M. S., & Suryanti. (2016). Developing educational video to improve the use of scientific approach in cooperative learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 725–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Coffey, J. E., Elby, A., & Levin, D. M. (2009). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tension in teaching and learning. Science Education, 94, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenaya, I. M. K. (2015). Pengaruh interaksi dan nilai interaksi pada percobaan faktorial (review). Agrotrop, 5(1), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• The National Center on Quality Teaching and Learning (NCQTL). (2012). Learning activity using the scientific method. The National Center on Quality Teaching and Learning (NCQTL).
   Google Scholar
• Tiantong, M., & Siksen, S. (2013). The online project-based learning model based on student’s multiple intelligence. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(7), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.2217/EBO.13.11
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., & Ford, M. (2009). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Wiley InterScience.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (2014). Teacher learning and professional development. In Teachers’ professional development: Assessment, training, and learning (pp. 79–95). Brill - Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-536-6
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, A. L. E., Muniz, J., & Edwards, B. (2003). Cooperative learning and its effects in a high school geometry. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 96(2), 112–116.
   Google Scholar
• Widjajanti, D. B. (2012). Teori Kecerdasan Majemuk: Apa dan Bagaimana Mengaplikasikannya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Penerapan MIPA (pp. M-1–M-7).
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, B. (2012). Engaging 6th grade students with mathematics by using multiple intelligence theory. Bilkent University.
   Google Scholar
• Zaim, M. (2017). Implementing scientific approach to teach English at senior high school in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n2p33
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, B., Niiya, M., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 24(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.948041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar