Effects of socioscientific issues-based teaching on attitudes: Students’ resources as moderator

References

• Ahmad, J., & Siew, N. M. (2022). An entrepreneurial science thinking module based on the socioscientific issues approach with thinking wheel map for primary school students in STEM education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asma, L., Walma van der Molen, J., & Van Aalderen-Smeets, S. (2011). Primary teachers’ attitudes towards science and technology. In M. De Vries, H. Van Keulen, S. Peters, & J. Walma van der Molen (Eds.), Professional development for primary teachers in science and technology. The Dutch VTB-Pro project in an international perspective (pp. 89–105). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capkinoglu, E., Yilmaz, S., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Quality of argumentation by seventh‐graders in local socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 827–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). The relationship of discipline background to upper secondary students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauer, J. M., Sorensen, A. E., & Wilson, J. (2021). Students’ civic engagement self-efficacy varies across socioscientific issues contexts. Frontiers in Education, 6, 628784. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.628784
   Google Scholar
• Deimel, D., Hoskins, B., & Abs, H. J. (2020). How do schools affect inequalities in political participation: Compensation of social disadvantage or provision of differential access? Educational Psychology, 40(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1645305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delen, I., & Sen, S. (2023). Effect of design-based learning on achievement in K-12 education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 330–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmaz, H., & Seçkin Karaca, H. (2020). Sosyobilimsel konulara dayalı fen eğitiminin 7. Sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyobilimsel konulara bakış açıları, bilimsel ve yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisi [Effects of science education based on socioscientific issues on 7th grade students’ views of socioscientific issues, skills of scientific and reflective thinking]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.607651
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Eş, H., & Öztürk, N. (2021). An activity for transferring the multidimensional structure of SSI to middle school science courses: I discover myself in the decision-making process with SEE-STEP!. Research in Science Education, 51(3), 889–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09865-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, D., & Landemore, H. (2018). The epistemic value of democratic deliberation. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 113–131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.26
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Sadler, T. D., & Tal, T. (2011). Metalogue: Assessment, audience, and authenticity for teaching SSI and argumentation. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 161–166). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_9
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Mun, K., & Kim, S. W. (2021). Using socioscientific issues to enhance students’ emotional competence. Research in Science Education, 51(S2), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09873-1
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, M., Scharfenberg, F.-J., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Instructional efficiency of different discussion approaches in an outreach laboratory: Teacher-guided versus student-centered. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.917601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guérin, L. J. F. (2018). Group problem solving as citizenship education: Mainstream idea of participation revisited. Saxion Progressive Education University Press. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/group-problem-solving-as-citizenship-education-mainstream-idea-of
   Google Scholar
• Guérin, L. J. F. (2019). Socio-scientific issues and citizenship education: From theory to the classroom. Inter- and Transdisciplinary Education, 1, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2557589
   Google Scholar
• Guérin, L. J. F., Klaver, L. T., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Sins, P. H. M. (2021). Onderzoeksrapport Samen werken aan Bèta Burgerschap [Research report Working together towards scientific citizenship]. TechYourFuture. Retrieved from https://www.techyourfuture.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Onderzoeksrapport-Samen-werken-aan-Beta-Burgerschap.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., Agesilaou, A., & Mappouras, D. (2018). Promoting RRI and active citizenship in an inquiry-based controversial socio-scientific issue: The case of cholesterol regulation with statins. Journal of Biological Education, 53(5), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1530277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The effects of using socio-scientific issues and technology in problem-based learning: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 11(10), 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2020). Going beyond STS education: Building a curriculum for sociopolitical activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 592–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, S. (2021). No child too young: A teacher research study of socioscientific issues implementation at the elementary level. In W. A. Powell (Ed.), Socioscientific issues-based instruction for scientific literacy development (pp. 1–30). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4558-4.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2020). Students’ perceptions of socio-scientific issue-based learning and their appropriation of epistemic tools for systems thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1339–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1759843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2022). Improving students’ conceptions of nature of science: A review of the literature. Science & Education, 32(6), 1887–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00390-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2020). The effects of community-based socioscientific issues program (SSI-COMM) on promoting students’ sense of place and character as citizens. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G., & Lee, H. (2021). A case study of community-based socioscientific issue program: Focusing on the abandoned animal issue. Journal of Biological Education, 55(4), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinskey, M., & Zeidler, D. (2021). Elementary preservice teachers’ challenges in designing and implementing socioscientific issues-based lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1826079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaver, L. T., Sins, P. H. M., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Guérin, L. J. F. (2023). Strengthening science education through attention to student resources: A conceptualization of socioscientific capital. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 1162–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaver, L. T., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2021). Measuring pupils’ attitudes towards socioscientific issues: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Science & Education, 30(2), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00174-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaver, L. T., Walma van der Molen, J. H., Sins, P. H. M., & Guérin, L. J. F. (2023). Students’ engagement with socioscientific issues: Use of sources of knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 1125–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klop, T., Severiens, S. E., Knippels, M. C. P. J., van Mil, M. H. W., & Ten Dam, G. T. M. (2010). Effects of a science education module on attitudes towards modern biotechnology of secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1127–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902943665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurup, P. M., Levinson, R., & Li, X. (2021). Informed-decision regarding global warming and climate change among high school students in the United Kingdom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00123-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2022). Prioritizing emotion objects in making sense of student learning of socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 357–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. L. M., Oliveira, A. W., & Harris, C. B. (2021). The potential of “civic science education”: Theory, research, practice, and uncertainties. Science Education, 105(6), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oražem, V., Smolej, T., & Tomažič, I. (2021). Students’ attitudes to and knowledge of brown bears (Ursus arctos L.): Can more knowledge reduce fear and assist in conservation efforts? Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 11(7), 1958. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071958
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students’ experience of working with socioscientific issues-a quantitative study in secondary school. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9238-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. A., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of socioscientific issues on middle school students’ character and values for global citizenship. In W. A. Powell (Ed.), Socioscientific issues-based instruction for scientific literacy development (pp. 56–91). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4558-4.ch003
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.55999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teegelbeckers, J. Y., Nieuwelink, H., & Oostdam, R. J. (2023). School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 39, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolkamp, J., Guérin, L. J. F., & Klaver, L. T. (2019). Bèta en technologie in burgerschapsonderwijs [Science and technology in citizenship education]. TechYourFuture. Retrieved from https://www.techyourfuture.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Praktijkboek-Beta-Burgerschap.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Topçu, M. S. (2010). Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students. Evaluation and Research in Education, 23(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500791003628187
   Google Scholar
• Usta, S., & Uçak, E. (2022). The effect of visual media-supported classroom discussion on 8th grade students’ attitudes towards socio-scientific issues, towards research and inquiry and on their decision making. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(2), 765–791.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Asma, L. J. F. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science: A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96(1), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Breukelen, G. J. P. (2013). ANCOVA Versus CHANGE from baseline in nonrandomized studies: The difference. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(6), 895–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.831743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Leij, T., Avraamidou, L., Wals, A., & Goedhart, M. (2022). Supporting secondary students’ morality development in science education. Studies in Science Education, 58(2), 141–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1944716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2022). The use of constructive controversy to improve students’ understandings of and attitudes towards animal welfare in China. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2011768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar