Confidence Intervals and the Scientific Method

References

• Bennett, J. H. (Ed.). (1990). Statistical inference and analysis. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson, J. (1938). Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chi-square test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 33, 526–542.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, S. G. (1989). Prediction and theory evaluation: The case of light bending. Science, 246, 1124–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, F. W., Eddington, A. S., & Davidson, C. (1920). A determination of the deflection of light by the sun’s gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 219-220, 291–333.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Olliver and Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1965). Logic of statistical inference. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayter, A. J. (1986). The maximum familywise error rate of Fisher’s least significant difference test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 1000–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, J., & Lehmann, E. (1954). Testing the approximate validity of statistical hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 16, 261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1939). Theory of probability. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keselman, H. J., Keselman, J. C. & Shaffer, J. P. (1991). Multiple pairwise comparisons of repeated measures means under violation of multisample sphericity. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1978). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), Imre Lakatos philosophical papers. Vol 1: The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. R., Serlin, R. C. & Seaman, M. A. (in press). A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. Psychological Bulletin.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, E. F. (1940). Sampling in educational research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 561–574.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micerri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (1969). Significance tests reconsidered. The American Sociologist, 4, 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A), 231, 289–337.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1960). The place of statistics in psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 641–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. A. (1990). Robust multiple comparisons. Unpublished monograph, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Sciama, D. W. (1969). The physical foundations of general relativity. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, M. A. (1990). A Monte Carlo examination of nonparametric multiple-comparison procedures for pairwise tests of location. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, M. A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 577–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvin, H. (1957). A critique of tests of significance in survey research. American Sociological Review, 22, 519–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serlin, R. C. & Lapsley, D. K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: The good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. P. (1979). Comparison of means: An F test followed by a modified multiple range procedure. Journal of Educational Statistics, 81, 826–831.
   Google Scholar
• Sidak, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 626–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, S. M. (1986). The history of statistics. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. J. (1920). [Address of the president]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 96, 311–322.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar