639
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MEASUREMENT, STATISTICS, AND RESEARCH DESIGN

Examination of the Structure and Grade-Related Differentiation of Multidimensional Self-Concept Instruments for Children Using ESEM

&

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Hilal, M.M., & Aal-Hussain, A.-Q. A. (1997). Dimensionality and hierarchy of the SDQ-I in a non-Western milieu: A test of self-concept invariance across gender. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 535–553.
  • Arens, A.K., Yeung, A.S., Craven, R.G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 970–981.
  • Arens, A.K., Yeung, A.S., Craven, R.G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2013). A short German version of the Self-Description Questionnaire I: Theoretical and empirical comparability. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36, 415–438.
  • Asendorpf, J.B., & van Aken, M.A. G. (1993). Deutsche Version der Selbstkonzeptskalen von Harter [German version Harter's self-concept scales]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 64–86.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
  • Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Gagnon, C. (1992). A reassessment of the Self-Perception Profile for Children: Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity of a French version among second through six grade children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 275–290.
  • Browne, M.W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150
  • Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Byrne, B.M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Chan, D.W. (2002). Perceived domain-specific competence and global self-worth of primary students in Hong Kong. School Psychology International, 23, 355–368.
  • Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
  • Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
  • Cole, D.A., Maxwell, S.E., Martin, J.M., Peeke, L.G., Seroczynski, A.D., Tram, J.M., … Maschman, T. (2001). The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design. Child Development, 72, 1723–1746.
  • Enders, C.K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Eiser, C., Eiser, J.R., & Havermanns, T. (1995). The measurement of self-esteem: Practical and theoretical considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 429–432.
  • Fox, K.R., & Corbin, C.B. (1989). The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.
  • Gavin, D.A. W., & Herry, Y. (1996). The French Self-Perception Profile for Children: Score validity and reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 678–700.
  • Graham, J.W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
  • Guay, F., Morin, A.J. S., Litalien, D., Valois, P., & Vallerand, R.J. (2014). Application of exploratory structural equation modeling to evaluate the academic motivation scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83, 51–82.
  • Harter, S. (1985). Self-Perception Profile for Children: Revision of the Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
  • Harter, S. (1988). Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
  • Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self. A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
  • Marsh, H.W., & MacDonald-Holmes, I.W. (1990). Multidimensional self-concepts: Construct validation of responses of children. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 89–117.
  • Maïano, C., Morin, A.J. S., Ninot, G., Monthuy-Blanc, J., Stephan, Y., Florent, J.-F., … Vallée, P. (2008). A short and very short form of the physical self-inventory for adolescents: Development and factor validity. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 9, 830–847.
  • Marsh, H.W. (1986a). Negative item bias in rating scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–49.
  • Marsh, H.W. (1986b). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149.
  • Marsh, H.W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 417–430.
  • Marsh, H.W. (1990a). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107–116.
  • Marsh, H.W. (1990b). Self-Description Questionnaire— I (SDQ-I). Manual. Macarthur, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
  • Marsh, H.W. (1990c). Self Description Questionnaire—II (SDQ-II). Manual. Macarthur, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
  • Marsh, H.W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
  • Marsh, H.W., Abduljabbar, A.S., Abu-Hilal, M., Morin, A.J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K.C., … Parker, P. (2013). Factor structure, discriminant and convergent validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of USA and Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 108–128.
  • Marsh, H.W., Asçl, F.H., & Marco, I.T. (2002). Multitrait-multimethod analyses of two physical self-concept instruments. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 99–119.
  • Marsh, H.W., & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687–706.
  • Marsh, H.W., Bar-Eli, M., Zach, S., & Richards, G.E. (2006). Construct validation of Hebrew versions of three physical self-concept measures: An extended multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 310–343.
  • Marsh, H.W., Craven, R.G., & Debus, R. (1991). Self-concepts of young children aged 5 to 8: Their measurement and multidimensional structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 377–392.
  • Marsh, H.W., Debus, R., & Bornholt, L.J. (2005). Validating young children's self-concept responses: Methodological ways and means to understand their responses. In D.M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 138–160). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K.-T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151–171.
  • Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics. (pp. 275–340). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu & Bentler's (1999). Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
  • Marsh, H.W., Liem, G.A. D., Martin, A.J., Morin, A.J. S., & Nagengast, B. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation model (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 322–346.
  • Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A.J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.
  • Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A.J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284.
  • Marsh, H.W., Morin, A.J. S., Parker, P., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.
  • Marsh, H.W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, A., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A.J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476.
  • Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A.J. S. (2012). Measurement invariance of Big Five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and La Dolce Vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218.
  • Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., Morin, A.J. S., Parada, R.H., Craven, R.G., & Hamilton, L.R. (2011). Construct validity of the multidimensional structure of bullying and victimization: An application of exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 701–732.
  • Marsh, H.W., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.
  • Marsh, H.W., Richards, G.E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16, 270–305.
  • Marsh, H.W., Scalas, L.F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381.
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
  • Messer, B., & Harter, S. (1986). Manual for the Adult Self-Perception Profile. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
  • Miller, H.-M., (2000). Cross-cultural validity of a model of self-worth application to Finnish children. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 105–118.
  • Millsap, R.E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Möller, J., & Marsh, H. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120, 544–560.
  • Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H.W. (2009). Meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129–1167.
  • Morin, A.J. S., & Maïano, C. (2011). Cross-validation of the short form of the Physical Self-Inventory (PSI-S) using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 12, 540–554.
  • Morin, A.J. S., Marsh, H.W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In Hancock, G.R., & Mueller, R.O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course ( 2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Fijen, P. (2003). The Self-Perception Profile for Children: Further evidence for factor structure, reliability, validity. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 1791–1802.
  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2012). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Pinxten, M., Marsh, H.W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 152–174.
  • Schmitt, T.A., & Sass, D.A. (2011). Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 71, 95–113.
  • Schumann, B.C., Striegel-Moore, R.H., McMahon, R.P., Waclawiw, M.A., Morrison, J.A., & Schreiber, G.B. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Self-Perception Profile for Children in a biracial cohort of adolescent girls: The NHLBI growth and heath study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 260–275.
  • Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
  • Shelvin, M., Adamson, G., & Collins, K. (2003). The Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC): A multiple-indicator multiple-wave analysis using LISREL. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1993–2005.
  • Stewart, P.K., Roberts, M.C., & Kim, K.L. (2010). The psychometric properties of the Harter Self-Perception Profile for children with at-risk African American females. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 326–333.
  • Trent, L.M. Y., Russell, G., & Cooney, G. (1994). Assessment of self-concept in early adolescence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 21–28.
  • Van den Bergh, B.R. H., & Van Rast, N. (1998). Self-concept in children: Equivalence of measurement and structure across gender and grade of Harter's Self-Perception Profile for Children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 564582
  • Watkins, D., & Akande, A. (1992). Internal structure of the Self-Description Questionnaire: A Nigerian investigation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 120–125.
  • Watkins, D., & Dong, Q. (1994). Assessing the self-esteem of Chinese school children. Educational Psychology, 14, 129–137.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.