Optimizing Conditions for Learning: Situating Refutations in Epistemic Cognition

REFERENCES

• Alvermann, D.E., & Hague, S.A. (1989). Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10, 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 39 (5), 581–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, S.M., & Ceci, S.J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: How they interact in learning from instructional texts. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 126–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J.L. G., Goldman, S.R., & Wiley, J. (2013). The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., & Schwartz, D.L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61–100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., Strømsø, H.I., & Brandmo, C. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L.E., Strømsø, H.I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 879–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L.E., Strømsø, H.I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 58–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Britt, M.A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, I. (2010). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38, 635–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, S.H., & Sinatra, G.M. (2010). Text in the science classroom: Promoting engagement to facilitate conceptual change. In M.G. McKeown (Ed.), Bringing reading researchers to life: Essays in honor of Isabelle Beck. (pp. 232–256). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change ( 2nd ed., pp. 49–70). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C.A., Buckland, L.A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem solving. Cognitive Science, 12, 563–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1991). Non-formal reasoning in science: The use of analogies, extreme cases, and physical intuition. InJ. Voss, D. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J.G., Snyder-Hogan, L.E., & Luciw-Dubas, U.A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I.N., Mouskounti, T., & Ioannides, C. (2011). Comprehension and learning from refutation and expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A.A. (2013). A bird's-eye view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 31–48). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N.K. (2000). 3.6 Minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L.E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22, 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: Examining the role of conflict. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R.J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J.A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J.A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43, 142–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J.A., & Yu, S.B. (2014). Modeling and measuring epistemic cognition: A qualitative re-investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 12–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M.C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V., & Gamas, W.S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 117–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B.K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B.K., & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynd, C. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(7–8), 699–714.
   Google Scholar
• Hynd, C.R., & Alvermann, D.E. (1986). The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts. Journal of Reading, 29, 440–446.
   Google Scholar
• Hynd, C., & Guzzetti, B.J. (1998). When knowledge contradicts intuition: Conceptual change. In C. Hynd (Ed.), Learning from text across conceptual domains (pp. 139–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kardash, C.M., & Scholes, R.J. (1996). Effects of pre-existing beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on the interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Muis, K., & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 365–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Smith, E.R., & O’Brien, E.J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 854–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). Interactions between prior knowledge and text structure during comprehension of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2005). The role of reader's misconceptions on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E., Smith, E.R., & O’Brien, E.J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E.J. (2014). The Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D.N. Rapp & J.L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, R. (2002). Folk epistemology: An introduction. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. (2011). The instrumental value of explanations. Philosophy Compass, 6, 539–551.
   Google Scholar
• Maria, K., & MacGinitie, W. (1987). Learning from texts that refute the reader's prior knowledge. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 222–238.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 165–196). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikklä-Erdmann, M., Penttinen, M., Anto, E., & Olkinuora, E. (2008). Constructing mental models during learning from scientific text. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & J.M. Spector (Eds.), Understanding models for learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Norbert M. Seel (pp. 63–79). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K.R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 177–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K.R., & Gierus, B. (2013). Beliefs about knowledge, knowing, and learning: Differences across knowledge types in physics. Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 408–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K.R., & Franco, G. (2010). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: Support for the consistency hypothesis. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P.K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and changing beliefs. In P.A. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. (pp. 305–324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Washington, DC: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E.J., & Myers, J.L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 419–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, W.G. , Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H.L., & Butler, A.C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H.L., & Karpicke, J.D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogosa, D.R., & Willett, J.B. (1983). Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royce, J.R. (1978). Three ways of knowing and the scientific world view. Methodology and Science, 11, 146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A.H. (1987). Confessions of an accidental theorist. For the Learning of Mathematics, 7, 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G.M., & Broughton, S.H. (2011). Bridging comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 369–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 255–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M.A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20, 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K., Goh, N., Chia, L., & Treagust, D.F. (2001). Secondary students’ perceptions about learning qualitative analysis in inorganic chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust D.F. (1988), Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C.D. (2010). Refutational text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 951–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumper, R. (2001). A cross-age study of senior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2008). Conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Zimmerman, D.W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete? Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar