How Students Report Dishonest Behavior in School: Self-Assessment and Anchoring Vignettes

References

• Anderman, E. M., Cupp, P. K., & Lane, D. (2010). Impulsivity and academic cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelini, V., Cavapozzi, D., Corazzini, L., & Paccagnella, O. (2012). Age, health and life satisfaction among older Europeans. Social Indicators Research, 105(2), 293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago d'Uva, T., van Doorslaer, E., Lindeboom, M., & O'Donnell, O. (2008). Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities? Health Economics, 17(3), 351–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. R., Kotkin, R. A., Swanson, J. M., & Miller, F. (1999). Stability of situational non-compliance in ADHD children in two school classroom settings. Journal of Attention Disorders, 3(1), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, K. K., & Whitley, B. E. (2010). Relation of general deviance to academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 10(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsang, E., & van Soest, A. (2012). Satisfaction with social contacts of older Europeans. Social Indicators Research, 105(2), 273–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. H., & Lipman, E. L. (2002). Do places matter? Socioeconomic disadvantage and behavioral problems of children in Canada. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 378–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. S., & Choong, P. (2005). A investigation of academic dishonesty among business students at public and private United States universities. International Journal of Management, 22(2), 201–214.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, J. (2009). Cross-national response styles in international educational assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006. New York, NY: New York University Department of Humanities and Social Sciences in the Professions. Retrieved from https://edsurveys.rti.org/PISA/documents/Buckley_PISAresponsestyle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabada, L., & Waisova, S. (2011). Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic in world politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B.W. Y. (2011). Classroom discipline across forty-one countries: School, economic, and cultural differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 516–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. (2001). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research. International Marketing Review, 18(3), 301–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80, 272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmody, M., Smyth, E., & McCoy, S. (2008). Acting up or opting out? Truancy in Irish secondary schools. Educational Review, 60(4), 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1994). Socialization mediators of the relation between socioeconomic status and child conduct problems. Child Development, 65(2), 649–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, M. A. (2010). Evaluating the relationship between student attendance and achievement in urban elementary and middle schools: An instrumental variables approach. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 434–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspaulka, Z.š. (2014). Školní řád. Retrieved from http://www.zshanspaulka.cz/dokumenty/skolni_rad/skolni_rad.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons: Education Committee. (2011). Behaviour and discipline in schools (Vol. 1). London, UK: Stationary Office. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeduc/516/516i.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hruška, J. (2011). O morálce v tržním hospodářství. Retrieved from http://sarmatia.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/o-moralce-v-trznim-hospodarstvi/
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2006). Understanding supply and demand among mathematics and science teachers. In J. Rhoton & P. Shane (Eds.), Teaching science in the 21st century (pp. 197–221). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It's wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., & van Soest, A. (2007). Vignettes and self-reports of work disability in the US and the Netherlands. American Economic Review, 97(1), 461–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., van Soest, A., & Vonkova, H. (2011). Anchoring vignettes and response consistency (RAND working paper WR-840). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2011/RAND_WR840.pdf
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Murray, C., Salomon, J., & Tandon, A. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 567–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, N., & Johansson, E. (2008). New evidence on cross-country differences in job satisfaction using anchoring vignettes. Labour Economics, 15, 96–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm, H., Wilson, V., Davidson, J., & Kirk, S. (2003). Absence from school: A study of its causes and effects in seven LEAs (Research Report No. 424). Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. Retrieved from dera.ioe.ac.uk/8655/1/RR424.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2000). A new era of school reform: Going where the research takes us. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Masaryk, T. G. (1900). Z dětské psychologie. Přednáška prof. dra T. G. Masaryka v universitním kurse učitelském. Český učitel. Věstník "Ústředního spolku jednot učitelských v král. Českém,” 3(25), 407–410.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Good, R. H. (2006). The use of reading and behavior screening measures to predict nonresponse to school-wide positive behavior support: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Review, 35(2), 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A., Shoptaugh, C., & Wooldridge, J. (2011). Reasons not to cheat, academic-integrity responsibility, and frequency of cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students' judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 765–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, C., Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2006). Predictors of a behavioral measure of scholastic cheating: Personality and competence but not demographics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okanović, P., Okanović, D., Mitrović, D., & Majstorović, N. (2013). Academic integrity “captured” by a personality-based test. Psihologija, 46(1), 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices. Vol. 4, Annex A6: Anchoring vignettes in PISA 2012 student questionnaire. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peracchi, F., & Rossetti C. (2012). Heterogeneity in health responses and anchoring vignettes. Empirical Economics, 42(2), 513–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peracchi, F., & Rossetti, C. (2013). The heterogeneous thresholds ordered response model: identification and inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 176(3), 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2002). Estimating CHOPIT models in gllamm: Political efficacy example from King et al. (2002). Retrieved from www.gllamm.org/chopit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rettinger, D. A., Jordan, A. E., & Peschiera, F. (2004). Evaluating the motivation to cheat: A vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 873–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. M., & Cavanagh, H. D. (2011). Non-compliance with contact lens wear and care practices: A comparative analysis. Optometry and Vision Science, 88(12), 1402–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roig, M., & DeTommaso, L. (1995). Are college cheating and plagiarism related to academic procrastination? Psychological Reports, 77, 691–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidler, R. (2011). Kdo krade, okrádá stát. Kdo nekrade, okrádá vlastní rodinu…. Retrieved from http://www.top09.cz/regiony/moravskoslezsky-kraj/tiskove-zpravy/kdo-krade-okrada-stat-kdo-nekrade-okrada-vlastni-rodinu-6479.html
   Google Scholar
• Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students' perceptions of academic dishonesty. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirven, N., Santos-Eggimann, B., & Spagnoli, J. (2012). Comparability of health care responsiveness in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 105(2), 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, S. A., Irvin, L. K., Horner, R. H., May, S. L., Emeldi, M., Tobin, T. J., & Sugai, G. (2010). Schoolwide social-behavioral climate, student problem behavior, and related administrative decisions: Empirical patterns from 1,510 schools nationwide. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(2), 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, Y., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Personal and contextual factors associated with students' cheating in science. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 440–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayfun, A. (2009). Is there a relationship between grade average point and students' perceptions with regard to cheating factors? Bilig, 49, 191–204.
   Google Scholar
• Tůma, R. (2012). Proč budu volit komunisty aneb Tahle země není pro starý. Retrieved from http://www.blisty.cz/art/64399.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest, A., & Vonkova, H. (2014). Testing the specification of parametric models using anchoring vignettes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 177(1), 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonkova, H. (2013). Subjektivní hodnocení problémů s pohybem: Užití parametrického modelu metody ukotvujících vinět. Orbis Scholae, 7(1), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Vonkova, H., & Hrabak, J. (2015). The (in) comparability of ICT knowledge and skill self-assessments among upper secondary school students: The use of the anchoring vignette method. Computers & Education, 85, 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonkova, H., & Hullegie, P. (2011). Is the anchoring vignettes method sensitive to the domain and choice of the vignette? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 174(3), 597–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonkova, H., Zamarro, G., & DeBerg, V. (2015). Comparisons of student perceptions of teacher's performance in the classroom: Using parametric anchoring vignette methods for improving comparability (AEFP 40th annual conference—paper). Retrieved from http://aefpweb.org/conferences/aefp40-download
   Google Scholar
• Vrbová, J. (2010). Co je na podvádění ve škole vlastně špatného? In J. Hábl & J. Doležalová (Eds.), Humanizace ve výchově a vzdělávání (pp. 156–165). Hradec Králové, Czech Republic: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Vrbová, J., & Stuchlíková, I. (2012). Školní podvádění starších žáků—pilotní studie. Pedagogika, 62(3), 317–331.
   Google Scholar
• Wand, J., King, G., & Lau, O. (2011). Anchors: Software for anchoring vignette data. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(3), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D., & Cheung, S. (1995). Culture, gender, and response buis: An analysis of responses to the self-description questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 490–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E., & Kost, C. R. (1999). College students' perceptions of peers who cheat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(8), 1732–1760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41, 657–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar