The Effect of Learner-Generated Drawing and Imagination in Comprehending a Science Text

References

• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 49–70). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 68–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalized cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9(4), 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2013). Becoming part of the story! Refueling the interest in visualization strategies for reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 261–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Dowhower, S. L. (1989). Repeated reading: Research into practice. The Reading Teacher, 42, 502–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E., Cooper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2014). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 117–133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginns, P. (2005). Imagining instructions: Mental practice in highly cognitive domains. Australian Journal of Education, 49, 128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ginns, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When imagining information is effective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 229–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. (2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of experimental and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Elsevier, North-Holland, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2000). Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehenders: Verbal vs. visual strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 772–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2010). Schema acquisition and sources of cognitive load. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 48–64). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., & Metz, B. (2010). Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animation. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 424–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load and the imagination effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 857–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 266–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 284–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22, 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). An imagination effect in learning from scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., Atkinson, R. K., Savenye, W. C., & Nelson, B. C. (2014). The effects of visual cues and self-explanation prompts: Empirical evidence in a multimedia environment. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.924531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., Atkinson, R. K., Christopherson, R. M., Joseph, S. S., & Harrison, C. J. (2013). Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? Computers and Education, 67, 239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., & Atkinson, R. K. (2013). Enhancing learning from different visualizations by self-explanations prompts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 83–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Lowe, R., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). Self-generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 167–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014b). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Kurby, C. A. (2008). The “ins” and “outs” of learning: Internal representations and external visualizations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 29–52). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, R. Z., & Blake, S. (1994). Using pictures to assist in comprehension and recall. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, 271–275.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. (1967). Mental practice: A review and discussion (Part 1). Research Quarterly, 38, 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2007). Toward a unified theory of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeck, A., Mayer, R. E., Opfermann, M., Pfeiffer, V., & Leutner, D. (2014). Drawing pictures during learning from scientific text: Testing the generative drawing effect and the prognostic drawing effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwamborn, A., Mayer, R. E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 872–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). An exploration of elementary school students’ conceptions of learning: A drawing analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 610–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, J. P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, J. P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 285–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, J. P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, J. P., & Theunissen, N. C. M. (2009). Prospective educational applications of mental simulations: A meta-review. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 93–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Z., & Linn, M. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualisations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Z., & Linn, M. (2013). Learning from chemical visualizations: Comparing generation and selection. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 2174–2197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar