The Effects of Instruction on Students' Generation of Self-Questions When Reading Multiple Documents

References

• Alexander, P. A., Dumas, D., Grossnickle, E. M., List, A., & Firetto, C. M. (2016). Measuring relational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 119–151. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.963216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, O., Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9–24. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing, 16(3), 195–218. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022895207490
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1027–1042. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 111–130. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9075-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6–28. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 814–840. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing tasks. Reading Psychology, 25, 313–339. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710490522658
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, L. (Ed.). (2001). Major problems in the gilded age and the progressive era: Documents and essays. Lexington, MA: Houghton Mifflin College Division.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010a). Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 157–173. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A., & Lehman, B. (2011). Questions drive comprehension of text and multimedia. In M. McCrudden, Magliano, J., & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 54–74). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Olde, B. A., Cooper-Pye, E., & Whitten, S. (2005). Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down. Memory and Cognition, 33(7), 1235–1247. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D. F., & Kiewra, K. A. (2010). What makes a matrix so effective? An empirical test of the relative benefits of signaling, extraction, and localization. Instructional Science, 38(6), 679–705. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9095-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111–126. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children's knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2), 127–148. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1993.9943857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2009). Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: Effects of external strategy use. Instructional Science, 37(4), 311–324. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, L. (2010). Studying epistemic cognition in the history classroom: Cases of teaching and learning to think historically (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P. B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10(4), 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaley, J. (2004). The challenges of making research relevant to practice. Presidential Invited Symposium, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In M. McCrudden, J. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 19–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 85–106. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113–125. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 372–391. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., & Guthrie J. T. (2006). Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 1–35. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P. N., & Firetto, C. (2008). Intertextuality and the study of new literacies: Research critique and recommendations. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1079–1092). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America's past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. (2004). What does it mean to read history? Fertile ground for cross-disciplinary collaborations? Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 342–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. (2012). Learning with texts in history: Protocols for reading and practical strategies. In T. L. Jetton & C. Shanahan (Eds.), Adolescent literacy in the academic disciplines (pp. 199–226). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Education Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekarets, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar