Investigating the Influence of Simultaneous– Versus Sequential–Text-Picture Presentation on Text-Picture Integration

References

• Anglin, G. J., Vaez, H., & Cunningham, K. (2004). Visual representations and learning: The role of static and animated graphics. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. (2nd ed., pp. 865–916). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 225, 556–559. doi:10.1126/science.1736359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Integration of verbal and visual information as evidenced by distortions in picture memory. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 363–375. doi:10.2307/1421930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16, 511–525. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95–123. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attention guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1215–1226. doi:10.1002/acp.1525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 172–176. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 178–191. doi:10.1037/a0026923
   Google Scholar
• Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232. doi:10.1007/BF02765184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammarella, N., Fairfield, B., & Di Domenico, A. (2013). When spatial and temporal contiguities help the integration in working memory: “A multimedia learning” approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 139–144. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). Effects of picture labeling on science text processing and learning: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 199–214. doi:10.1002/rrq.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2015). Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 172–187. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers and Education, 60, 95–109. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 638–643. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K. (1977). Cross-modality semantic integration of sentence and picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 515–524. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.5.515
   Google Scholar
• Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fürstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 159–173. doi:10.1037/a0023588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fürstenberg, A., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2010). Working memory interference during processing texts and pictures: Implications for the explanation of the modality effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 164–176. doi:10.1002/acp.1546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: New insights from investigating students' viewing behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 226–237. doi:10.1002/acp.1554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2011). Colorful bouquets in multimedia research: A closer look at the modality effect. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 269–276. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler, A., Arndt, J., & Scheiter, K. (2015). Processing multimedia material: Does integration of text and pictures result in a single or two interconnected mental representations?. Learning and Instruction, 35, 62–72. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler, A., Scheiter, K., Rummer, R., & Gerjets, P. (2012). Explaining the modality effect in multimedia learning: Is it due to a lack of temporal contiguity with written text and pictures? Learning and Instruction, 22, 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler, A., Scheiter, K., & Schmidt-Weigand, F. (2011). Boundary conditions and constraints of the modality effect. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 211–220. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95–99. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wippich, W. (1987). The integration of pictorial and verbal information (Untersuchungen zur Integration bildlicher und sprachlicher Information). Sprache and Kognition, 6, 23–35. doi:10.1515/9783111371054.317
   Google Scholar