Supporting Self-Regulated Learning With Digital Media Using Motivational Regulation and Metacognitive Prompts

References

• Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 127–156). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/Journal of Pedagogical Psychology, 23, 139–145. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 829–835. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2013). Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 171–186). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40, 193–211. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Heyn, S., & Köller, O. (1992). Das Kieler Lernstrategien-Inventar [Kiel inventory of learning strategies]. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(96)00015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where are we today? International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457. doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00014-2
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of self regulation. Burlington, NJ: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.-M., Sun, S.-Y., Sun, P.-S., & Ju, T. (2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of web-based learning continuance. Computers and Education, 49, 1224–1245. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819–837. doi:10.1080/095006900412293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 557–573. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00476.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (1999). Volition: Use with measure. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 321–333. doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80006-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresel, M., & Haugwitz, M. (2006). The relationship between cognitive abilities and self-regulated learning: Evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gender. High Ability Studies, 16, 201–218. doi:10.1080/13598130600618066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelschalk, T., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2016). Effectiveness of motivational regulation: Dependence on specific motivational problems. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 72–78. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelschalk, T., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2017). Quantity and quality of motivational regulation among university students. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1154–1170. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1322177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, T. (1999). Maintaining the motivation to learn: An introduction to this special issue of learning and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 231–232. doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80001-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, A., & Souvignier, E. (2000, September). Lernstrategien und Lernerfolg [Learning strategies and learning success]. Paper presented at the 42nd Conference of the German Psychological Society, Jena, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iStart. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225–234. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016). Effects of using motivational regulation strategies on students' academic procrastination, academic performance, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162–170. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y., Ching, Y., Mathews, J., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009). Undergraduate students’ self-regulated learning experience in web-based learning environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 109–121. Retrieved from http://itecideas.pbworks.com/f/44895673nn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: Instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20, 18–29. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139–161. doi:10.2190/ax2d-y9vm-v7px-0tad
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42, 302–307. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id = EJ816925
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 1042–1629. doi:10.1007/bf02504926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837–858. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199909)36:7<837::Aid-tea6>3.0.co;2-u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, D., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 36, 203–231. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nückles, M., Hübner, S., Dümer, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effects in writing-to-learn. Instructional Science, 38, 237–258. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9106-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nückles, M., Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2004). The use of public learning diaries in blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 49–66. doi:10.1080/1358165042000186271
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2004). Examining the effectiveness of innovative instructional methods on reducing statistics anxiety for graduate students in the social sciences. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 149–159. Retrieved from eric.http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ774076
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Taking control of research on volitional control. Challenges for future theory and research. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 335–354. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 250–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40, 1–12. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2002). Students’ conceptions of statistics: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Statistics Education, 10, 1–18. Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n2/reid.html
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C., & Stein, F. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current states (pp. 335–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221. doi:10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 623–637. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90006-1
   Google Scholar
• Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 379–390. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K., Maier, J., & Nückles, M. (2012). Writing about the personal utility of learning contents in a learning journal improves learning motivation and comprehension. Education Research International, 2012, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2012/319463
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D., & Zimmerman, B. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 621–627. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome—comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 269–279. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., von der Laden, T., & Spinath, B. (2007). Strategien zur Motivationsregulation und ihre Erfassung [Motivational regulation strategies and their measurement]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie/Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 39, 57–69. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.39.2.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinger, M., & Otterpohl, N. (2017). Which one works best? Considering the relative importance of motivational regulation strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 122–132. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loon, A.-M., Ros, A., & Martens, R. (2012). Motivated learning with digital learning tasks: What about autonomy and structure? Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1015–1032. doi:10.0.3.239/s11423-012-9267-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingstone, J. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40 (1), 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C., & Hume, L. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1007/bf02209024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Hoa, L. W., & Klauda, S. L. (2008). The role of achievement values in the self-regulation of achievement behaviors. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 169–195). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P., & Perry, N. (2000). Measuring Self-Regulated Learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 531–566). doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50045-7
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (2010). Self-regulated learning and socio-cognitive theory. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 503–508). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (2012). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning. Theory, research and applications (pp. 297–314). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, F., Greene, J., & Costich, C. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429–444. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281–299. doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–254. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C., & Benzon, M. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 199–221. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., & Stöger, H. (2008). Addressees of performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 643–654. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313. doi:10.1016/0361-476x(86)90027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulated learning: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar