Navigating Print and Digital Sources: Students’ Selection, Use, and Integration of Multiple Sources Across Mediums

References

• Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 10, 213–250.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032008010
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2012). The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (DRLRL). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). What responses to domain-specific analogy problems reveal about emerging competence: A new perspective on an old acquaintance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 397–406. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, S., & Sanchez, C. A. (2012). Working memory capacity and learning underlying conceptual relationships across multiple documents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 594–600. doi: 10.1002/acp.2834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2017). The discrepancy-induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52, 167–181. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 180–195. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple tests: The roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 321–348.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/01638530902959646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 180–192. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 209–222. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyi, H. I., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2002). An explorative study on the market relation between online and print newspapers. Journal of Media Economics, 15(2), 91–106. doi: 10.1207/S15327736ME1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards. (2015). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
   Google Scholar
• Creel, S. (2008). Young teens on reading and ereading: A survey. Youth Voice Advocates, 31(3), 201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Wills, T. W. (2016). Flexible strategy use by students who learn much versus little from text: Transitions within think-aloud protocols. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 50–71. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkens, G. (2004). Multiple Episode Protocol Analysis (MEPA). Version 4.10. Retrieved September 21, 2016 from author.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E. (2009). The role of reader characteristics in processing and learning from informational text. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 197–261. doi: 10.3102/0034654308324654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31, 30–68. doi: 10.1080/02702710902733600
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R. (2011). Choosing and using multiple information sources: Some new findings and emergent issues. Learning and Instruction, 21, 238–242. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the Information Age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 255–269. doi: 10.1080/10824669.2013.773217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477. doi: 10.2307/350902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, 19, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11145-003-8128-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bigot, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 445–470. doi: 10.1080/10862960701675317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Cognitive affective engagement model of multiple source use. Educational Psychologist, 52, 182–199. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Alexander, P. A., & Stephens, L. A. (2017). Trust but verify: Examining the association between students' sourcing behaviors and ratings of text trustworthiness. Discourse Processes, 54(2), 83–104. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1174654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Grossnickle, E. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2015). Profiling students’ multiple source use by question type. Reading Psychology, 37(5), 753–797. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2015.1111962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Stenseth, T., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2016). The effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on Norwegian students’ document selection: A mixed methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1037/edu0000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2), 153–157. doi: 10.1007/BF02295996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguela, M., Solé, I., & Pieschl, S. (2015). Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: Evidence from online and offline measures. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 721–744. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9547-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann, A. B., Wechsung, I., & Krems, J. F. (2009). How to support learning from multiple hypertext sources. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 639–646. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., Garland, K., & Robbins, L. (2004). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Is workload another test mode effect? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 111–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. G., Alexander, P. A., & List, A. (2017). The argument for epistemic competence. In A. Bernholt, H. Gruber, & B. Moschner (Eds.), Wissen und Lernen: Wie epistemische Überzeugungen Schule, Universität und Arbeitswelt beeinflussen (Knowledge and learning: How epistemic beliefs influence school, university and the workplace). New York, NY: Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Pew Internet and& American Life Project, February 28, 2013. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-and-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers and Education, 63, 259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers' representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52, 200–215. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 2–5. doi: 10.1177/009862830803500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slate, J. R., & Saudargas, R. A. (1987). Classroom behaviors of LD, seriously emotionally disturbed, and average children: A sequential analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(2), 125–134. doi: 10.2307/1510219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 716–737. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy web: Changes in reading from print to screen. Reading Teacher, 55(7), 662–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Strien, J. L. H., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2014). Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts: Effects of prior attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walravin, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers and Education, 52, 234–246. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers and Education, 55(3), 945–948. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar