665
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design

Adaptation and Validation of the Research Motivation Scale for Language Teachers

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M., & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 482–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014236
  • Bahrami, V., Hosseini, M., & Atai, M. R. (2019). Exploring research-informed practice in English for academic purposes: A narrative study. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 152–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.02.003
  • Blustein, D. L. (1988). The relationship between motivational processes and career exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32(3), 345–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90025-5
  • Borg, S. (2006). Conditions for teacher research. English Teaching Forum, 44, 22–27.
  • Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007
  • Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170
  • Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Borg, S., & Liu, Y. D. (2013). Chinese college English teachers' research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.56
  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  • Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 237–254). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Burns, A. (2013). Qualitative teacher research. In C. A. Chapelle, (Ed.). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 4816–4823). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
  • Daniel, J. (2012). Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Deci, E. L., & Moller, A. C. (2005). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence motivation (pp. 579–597). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Deemer, E. D., Martens, M. P., & Buboltz, W. C. (2010). Toward a tripartite model of research motivation: Development and initial validation of the research motivation scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 292–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710364794
  • Dikilitaş, K., & Griffiths, C. (2017). Developing teacher autonomy through action research. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Edwards, C. (2005). Epilogue: Teachers exploring research. In Corony, E. & Jane, W. (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 256–279). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainability. ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv060
  • Elliot, A. J. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 361–387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 171–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.171
  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 865–906.
  • Fernet, C., Senécal, C., Guay, F., Marsh, H., & Dowson, M. (2008). The work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST). Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 256–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707305764
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 625–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203573
  • Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2011). Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient’: Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 61–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383344
  • Gholami, K., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2014). Teacher researcher: An epistemic pedagogy for reconstructing teacher professional identity in Iran. International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part A), 22, 329–351.
  • Gilliland, B. (2018). Teacher research during an international practicum. ELT Journal, 72(3), 260–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx054
  • Graham, J. M., Guthrie, A. C., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 142–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_7
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., Mockler, N., Ponte, P., & Rӧnnerman, K. (2013). Facilitating practitioner research: Developing transformational partnerships. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hanks, J. (2019). From research-as-practice to exploratory practice-as-research in language teaching and beyond. Language Teaching, 52(2), 143–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000016
  • Holmes Finch, W., & French, B. F. (2019). Educational and psychological measurement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • in de Wal, J. J., den Brok, P. J., Hooijer, J. G., Martens, R. L., & Van den Beemt, A. (2014). Teachers' engagement in professional learning: Exploring motivational profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.001
  • International Test Commission. (2005). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Retrieved from http://www.intestcom.org
  • Jackson, D. L., Voth, J., & Frey, M. P. (2013). A note on sample size and solution propriety for confirmatory factor analytic models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(1), 86–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.742388
  • Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2002). Teachers' narrative inquiry as professional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahn, J. H., & Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(1), 38–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097251005
  • Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  • Kane, M. T. (2015). Explicating validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 198–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1060192
  • Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford University Press.
  • Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Larsen, R. J., & Augustine, A. A. (2008). Basic personality dispositions. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 151–164). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Li, C. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 10.8.02: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semi-confirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497–498.
  • Medgyes, P. (2017). The (ir) relevance of academic research for the language teacher. ELT Journal, 71(4), 491–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx034
  • Mehrmohammadi, M. (2004). Teacher classroom research: Reflections on a nation-wide experience in Iran. International Journal of Humanities, 11, 133–144.
  • Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2017). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Mitchell, R. (2011). Current trends in classroom research. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 675–705). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Murray, J. M. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the independent school teacher development inventory. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 219–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.672346
  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2015). Mplus: A general latent variable modeling program (version 7.4). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 337–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436903
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Shrama, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peters, G. (2017). Userfriendlyscience: Quantitative analysis made accessible, R package version 0.7.2. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=userfriendlyscience
  • Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Roth, G. (2014). Antecedents and outcomes of teachers’ autonomous motivation: A self-determination theory analysis. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice (pp. 36–51). London: Routledge.
  • Rothbart, M.K., & Hwang, J. (2005). Temperament and the development of competence and motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence & motivation (pp. 167–184). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation and the organization of human behavior: Three reasons for the reemergence of a field. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 3–10). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  • Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Smith, J. L., Deemer, E. D., Thoman, D. B., & Zazworsky, L. (2014). Motivation under the microscope: Understanding undergraduate science students’ multiple motivations for research. Motivation and Emotion, 38(4), 496–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9388-8
  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
  • Stout, R. T. (1996). Staff development policy: Fuzzy choices in an imperfect market. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 4, 2–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v4n2.1996
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson, Education, Inc.
  • Tavakoli, P., & Howard, M. J. (2012). Teaching English to speakers of other languages teachers’ views on the relationship between research and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 229–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643398
  • Taylor, C.S. (2013). Validity and validation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • The Ministry of Education. (2017). The guidebook for the annual evaluation of Iranian school teachers. Tehran, Iran: MOE.
  • Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
  • van de Vijver, F. J. (2016). Test adaptations. In F. T. L. Leong, D. Bartram, F. M. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger, & D. Iliescua (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 364–376). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Watkins, M. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1113–1126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
  • Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
  • Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505943
  • Yuan, R., Sun, P., & Teng, L. (2016). Understanding language teachers’ motivations towards research. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 220–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.279

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.