References
- Algina, J., Keselman, H., & Penfield, R. (2005). An alternative to Cohen’s standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.317
- American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA Publications: American Educational Research Association. http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/12ERv35n6_Standard4Report%20.pdf.
- American Statistical Association. (n.d.). Reproducible research recommendations. https://www.amstat.org/asa/News/ASA-Develops-Reproducible-Research-Recommendations.aspx.
- Cliff, N. (1993). Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 494–509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.494
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Grissom, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.68.1.155
- Grissom, R., & Kim, J. (2001). Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.135
- Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1984). Nonparametric estimators of effect size in meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 573–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.573
- Hess, B., Olejnik, S., & Huberty, C. (2001). The efficacy of two improvement-over-chance effect sizes for two-group univariate comparisons under variance heterogeneity and nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(6), 909–936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971572
- Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Lix, L. M., Wilcox, R. R., & Deering, K. N. (2008). A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychological Methods, 13(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.110
- Kraemer, H., & Andrews, G. (1982). A nonparametric technique for meta-analysis effect size calculation. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 404–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.404
- Krauth, J. (1983). Nonparametric effect size estimation: A comment on Kraemer and Andrews. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 190–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.190
- Lipsey, M., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Herbert, M., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M., Roberts, M., Anthony, K., Busick, M. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. Institute for Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/.
- Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.156
- National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES ). (n.d.). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Institute for Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ecls/.
- Peng, C., & Chen, L. (2014). Beyond Cohen’s d: Alternative effect size measures for between-subject designs. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 22–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745471
- Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2012). Variance heterogeneity in published psychological research: A review and a new index. Methodology, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000034
- R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000034
- RStudio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio, Inc.
- Stillwell, A., Buettner, P., & Ho, Y. (2010). Meta-analysis of survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer managed with surgical resection versus chemotherapy alone. World Journal of Surgery, 34(4), 797–807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0366-y
- Sunguya, B., Poudel, K., Mlunde, L., Shakya, P., Urassa, D., Jimba, M., & Yasuoka, J. (2013). Effectiveness of nutrition training of health workers toward improving caregivers’ feeding practices for children aged six months to two years: a systematic review. Nutrition Journal, 12, 14–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-66
- Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44(5), 423–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20234
- Vargha, A., & Delaney, H. D. (2000). A critique and improvement of the common CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25(2), 101–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1165329
- Wilcox, R. R. (1987). New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 165–170.
- Wilcox, R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing: A volume in statistical modeling and decision science (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
- Wilcox, R. R., & Keselman, H. J. (2003). Modern robust data analysis methods: Measures of central tendency. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 254–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.254
- Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.