Trajectories of Students’ Writing Feedback Attitudes

References

• Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., Lohmann, S., Chan, S., & Jiang, D. (2018). The psychology of attitudes, motivation, and persuasion. In D. Albarracín & B. T. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008010
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data (Vol. 136). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 32(3), 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & Schmitz, M. F. (2000). Latent growth curve modeling with a cohort sequential design. Social Work Research, 24(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/24.4.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. W., Seaman, S. R., White, I. R., & Carpenter, J. R. (2015). Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: Accommodating the substantive model. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 24(4), 462–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280214521348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L. (2015). Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). BIC and alternative Bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.856691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., Cho, C., Ahn, H. S., & Kim, H. J. (2012). Comparison of self-beliefs for predicting student motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.627401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (2014). Motivation in educational contexts: Does gender matter?. In L. S. Liben & R. S. Bigler (Eds.), The role of gender in educational contexts and outcomes (pp. 1–41). Advances in Child Development and Behavior.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho, A., Alves, R. A., & Boscolo, P. (2021a). Writing motivation in school: A systematic review of empirical research in the early twenty-first century. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09530-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, A., Alves, R. A., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & Boscolo, P. (2021b). Relations among motivation, behaviour, and performance in writing: A multiple-group structural equation modeling study . The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1456–1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1963). Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 6, pp. 94–172). McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, P., Milsom, C., Brooman, S., & Jubb, E. (2017). Student views of assessment and feedback. Innovations in Practice, 2(2), 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Cecil Smith, M. (1990). A longitudinal investigation of reading attitude development from childhood to adulthood. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, J., MacKinnon, D. P., & Khoo, S. T. (2003). Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 238–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (2004). An introduction to latent growth curve modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80042-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 404–434). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., Iver, D. M., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1086/461740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., & Conklin, S. (2015). The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: Writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2018). Clarifying an elusive construct: A systematic review of writing attitudes. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9423-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2013). Dealing with missing data in developmental research. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., Keller, B. T., & Levy, R. (2018). A fully conditional specification approach to multilevel imputation of categorical and continuous variables. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 298–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley series in social psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2018). Instructional feedback in writing. In A. Lipnevich, & J. Smith (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 145–168). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Daley, S. G., Aitken, A. A., Harris, K. R., & Robinson, K. H. (2018). Do writing motivational beliefs predict middle school students' writing performance? Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. [Database] https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., Danielson, R. W., Sinatra, G. M., & Graham, J. (2017). Modifying knowledge, emotions, and attitudes regarding genetically modified foods. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1260523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Dent, A. L. (2018). Developmental trajectories of skills and abilities relevant for self-regulation of learning and performance. In D. H. Schunk, & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 49–63). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huque, M. H., Carlin, J. B., Simpson, J. A., & Lee, K. J. (2018). A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller, B. T., & Enders, C. K. (2018). Blimp User's Manual (Version 1.1). CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, R. E. (1993). Development of a writing attitude survey for grades 9 to 12: Effects of gender, grade, and ethnicity. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenka, A. C., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Moshontz, H., Atkinson, K. M., Sanchez, C., & Cooper, H. (2021). A meta-analysis on the impact of grades and comments on academic motivation and achievement: A case for written feedback. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 922–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1659939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2013). Can writing attitudes and learning behavior overcome gender difference in writing? Evidence from NAEP. Written Communication, 30(2), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313480313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. E. V., Obradović, J., Carpiano, R. M., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2013). Multiple Imputation of missing multilevel, longitudinal data: A case when practical considerations trump best practices? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 12(1), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1367382480
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/749662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrs, S., Ekholm, E., & Zumbrunn, S. (2018). Exploring profiles of student perceptions of writing feedback [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Marrs, S. A., Zumbrunn, S. K., McBride, C., & Stringer, J. (2016). Exploring elementary student perceptions of writing feedback. Journal on Educational Psychology, 10(1), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, R. S., Aricak, O. T., & Jewell, J. (2008). Influence of reading attitude on reading achievement: A test of the temporal‐interaction model. Psychology in the Schools, 45(10), 1010–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., Kimball, K., & Ledford, J. (2015). Effects of asynchronous audio feedback on the story revision practices of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(4), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, Y., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). Tests for linkage of multiple cohorts in an accelerated longitudinal design. Psychological Methods, 5(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R., Horton, R., Vevea, J., Citkowicz, M., Lauber, E., & Albarracín, D. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murau, A. M. (1993). Shared writing: Students' perceptions and attitudes of peer review. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 9(2), 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2000). Methodological issues in random coefficient growth modeling using a latent variable framework: Applications to the development of heavy drinking ages 18-37. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 113–140). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselroade, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1979). Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M., & Kendrick, R. (2008). Origin of attitudes. In W. D. Crano, & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change: Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 111–130). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2017). “Now that’s the feedback I want!” Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Wichman, A. L., MacCallum, R. C., & Briggs, N. E. (2008). Latent growth curve modeling (No. 157). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., & Stacks, D. W. (1992). Student characteristics and writing apprehension. The Journalism Educator, 47(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769589204700206
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 49(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others’ evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. E., Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Moshontz, H., & Cooper, H. (2017). Self-grading and peer-grading for formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• semTools Contributors. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4-14. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Hartranft, A. M., Doyle, B., & Zelinke, S. B. (2015). Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Reading and Writing, 28(9), 1381–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinkamp, M. W., & Maehr, M. L. (1983). Affect, ability, and science achievement: A quantitative synthesis of correlational research. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053003369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minorities than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2010). More than a matter of cognition: An exploration of affective writing problems of post-graduate students and their possible solutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003619961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2009). Single item measures of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization are useful for assessing burnout in medical professionals. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(12), 1318–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F. (2006). Best practices in quantitative methods for developmentalists: III. Missing data: What to do with or without them. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71(3), 42–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., & Albarracín, D. (2005). Belief formation, organization, and change: Cognitive and motivational influences. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes (pp. 273–322). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R., & Johnson, D. R. (2015). Handling missing values in longitudinal panel data with multiple imputation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 77(1), 277–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., Broda, M., Ekholm, E., Jackson, L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2019). Toward a more complete understanding of writing enjoyment: A mixed methods study of elementary students. AERA Open, 5(2), 233285841985079–233285841985016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419850792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., & Mewborn, C. (2016). Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: A mixed methods study. Reading and Writing, 29(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9599-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar