Brief Report: Polynomial Regression Mixture Modeling for Heterogeneous Effects of Informant Congruence

References

• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., Rönkkö, M., & Hu, J. (2020). Polynomial regression and measurement error: Implications for information systems research. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 51(3), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410977.3410981
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• De Los Reyes, A. (2011). Introduction to the special section. More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 40(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.533405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Los Reyes, A., Wang, M., Lerner, M. D., Makol, B. A., Fitzpatrick, O. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2023). The operations triad model and youth mental health assessments: Catalyzing a paradigm shift in measurement validation. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 52(1), 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2111684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. erratum, 58, 323–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613. https://doi.org/10.2307/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618757600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., & von der Embse, N. P. (2014). The Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener—Teacher Rating Scale [Measurement instrument]. FastBridge Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Vermunt, J., Bakk, Z., Jaki, T., & Van Horn, M. L. (2016). Modeling predictors of latent classes in regression mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1158655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korelitz, K. E., & Garber, J. (2016). Congruence of parents’ and children’s perceptions of parenting: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(10), 1973–1995. https:// https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0524-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2021). Mplus 8.7. [Computer software] Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nestler, S., Humberg, S., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Response surface analysis with multilevel data: Illustration for the case of congruence hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, M. L., Jaki, T., Masyn, K., Howe, G., Feaster, D. J., Lamont, A. E., George, M. R. W., & Kim, M. (2015). Evaluating differential effects using regression interactions and regression mixture models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(4), 677–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414554931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, M. L., Jaki, T., Masyn, K., Ramey, S. L., Smith, J. A., & Antaramian, S. (2009). Assessing differential effects: Applying regression mixture models to identify variations in the influence of family resources on academic achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1298–1313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(4), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Der Embse, N., Kim, E., Jenkins, A., Sanchez, A., Kilgus, S. P., & Eklund, K. (2021). Profiles of rater dis/agreement within universal screening in predicting distal outcomes. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 43(3), 632–645. 10.1007/s10862-021-09869-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Der Embse, N., Kim, E. S., Kilgus, S., Dedrick, R., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Multi-informant universal screening: Evaluation of rater, item, and construct variance using a trifactor model. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 52–66. 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.09.00531837728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Kim, E., Ferron, J. M., Dedrick, R. F., Tan, T. X., & Stark, S. (2021). Testing measurement invariance across unobserved groups: The role of covariates in factor mixture modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420925122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Zammuto, R. F., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Multilevel latent polynomial regression for modeling (in) congruence across organizational groups: The case of organizational culture research. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115588570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar